Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

4 Pages«<234
wbute Offline
#61 Posted : Friday, 9 August 2019 3:25:13 PM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 871

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 9 post(s)
Yeah I know but it was interesting that it had the column shift like the other Statesman that was being discussed.
HK1837 Offline
#62 Posted : Friday, 9 August 2019 4:08:34 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 12,911

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 157 time(s) in 155 post(s)
I think the delete buckets and console shift on WB Deville was only when Trimatic was available, so it is only 1982-1984/5 models. ‘80 and ‘81 should all be console shift.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Dr Terry Offline
#63 Posted : Friday, 9 August 2019 7:49:54 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 5,495

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 74 time(s) in 70 post(s)
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
I think the delete buckets and console shift on WB Deville was only when Trimatic was available, so it is only 1982-1984/5 models. ‘80 and ‘81 should all be console shift.


Correct, the literature I have says TriMatic replaced TH350 around Nov 81, however PO A75 (front bench, column auto) wasn't available until Nov 82.

They were not all that uncommon at the time, they were sold as hire cars & also to Govt. fleets. A bit like the original HQ Statesman in 6-cyl & 253 form, common in the day, not so now.

Maybe working in the industry (for hire car companies & for & with dealerships) I've seen more of these than most.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
HK1837 Offline
#64 Posted : Saturday, 10 August 2019 10:59:43 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 12,911

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 157 time(s) in 155 post(s)
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
202HC and M15 3spd manual was standard in a HQ 6cyl Statesman. 253HC and M15 3spd manual was standard in V8 HQ Statesman. In the 6cyl one you could option M40, M20 and possibly even M22. Not sure if you could option a heavy duty rear axle (Salisbury) in HQ Statesman, also if 202LC was optional. In V8 HQ Statesman you could option the other three optional V8 engines (253LC, 308 and 350). 308 would be standard with M21 and optional with M40, L30 (350) would be auto only.

I have total HQ to WB Statesman build numbers, 6cyl is pretty low in comparison, around 1500 from memory. I think there was one 308 M21 Statesman and not many 350 either but 1000’s of 350 Devilles plus lots of the Chevrolet badged XU7 export/consulate versions as well with 350. There used to be a white M21 plated Deville near me but it had to be a mistake as it didn’t have the telltale 4spd evidence on the body.

I have seen plenty of both 6cyl and 253 Statemans in wreckers but never bothered collecting tags off them. I only ever collected 350 Deville tag sets which I think I have at least two sets, maybe three. Dr Terry told me he saw an 11QS engine once, but I have not seen an 11QM or 11QS personally.

Plenty of HJ Devilles made in 3.3L 4spd too for export to Malaysia as SUP vehicles. This was the standard driveline for this car in that market. I don’t think any of the Statesman bodied cars were CKD either, only SUP so they would only ever have got GMH engines not local engines eg 250ci Chevy design in South Africa.


I found those Statesman build totals, it is an archival document generated on 14/12/84 for the history file. The rarest is HQ 6cyl at 749 followed by HX Caprice at 1526 and HQ V8 Statesman at 1587. The most common is HQ Deville at 15760 followed by WB Deville at 9717. The rest all sit between 2500-ish and 6000-ish. You can see why they dropped the Statesman at the end of HQ as Deville was about 9x more made. I bet Monaro was dropped at the end of HQ for similar reasons.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
justgm Offline
#65 Posted : Saturday, 10 August 2019 2:36:20 PM(UTC)
justgm

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 30/04/2005(UTC)
Posts: 330
Man
New Zealand

Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 10 post(s)
Hi all , what about VN LS wagon 20 only. Thanks Mark.
life is good in "Wine & Holden Marlborough "
Dr Terry Offline
#66 Posted : Saturday, 10 August 2019 3:22:10 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 5,495

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 74 time(s) in 70 post(s)
Originally Posted by: justgm Go to Quoted Post
Hi all , what about VN LS wagon 20 only. Thanks Mark.


To my knowledge these were NZ market only, but rare just the same.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
commodorenut Offline
#67 Posted : Saturday, 10 August 2019 9:20:00 PM(UTC)
commodorenut

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 2/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 3,123

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 31 time(s) in 30 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Dr Terry Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: wbute Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
It was originally a 6cyl though wasn’t it? It was probably originally a 6cyl auto which would be standard with bench seat and column shift. Was it a Kingswood or Holden ute?


It was a 6 banger. Not sure on transmission etc. I just couldn’t believe it had a column shift Statesman interior!


The Brock Magnum ute, doesn't really cut it as a one-off or rare Holden. It was built/converted by HDT post production. It's not the same car that left the assembly line.

Dr Terry

Originally Posted by: wbute Go to Quoted Post
Yeah I know but it was interesting that it had the column shift like the other Statesman that was being discussed.


It was converted by HDT well after it was produced by Holden, and as it started as a regular WB commercial, the column shift + statesman interior becomes irrelevant, as it didn't have this combination from the factory.

HDT had "parts bin" access (albeit restricted dramatically after Feb 1987), and would have sourced whatever the customer wanted.
The seat would be trimmed to suit whatever they needed it to.
Cheers,

Mick
_______________________________________________________________

Judge a successful man not on how he treats his peers, but on how he treats those less fortunate.
wbute Offline
#68 Posted : Sunday, 11 August 2019 8:38:56 AM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 871

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 9 post(s)
Yeah I am aware of all that. The bloke that had it built is distantly connected to my wife. Then it ended up with another owner in my home town. It had a 5 post bullbar and all the Aggie accessories of the day on it then. I checked it out not long before he sold it, when it was parked in the Orange Ag car park. I have also spoken to the current owner.
Apparently it sat in the HDT workshop for a long time before they ended up building it.
I was only saying it was coincidental that the only Magnum ute had this terrible interior put in it too.
Did anyone ever work out why the column shift WB Statesman had the different three spoke steering wheel?

Edited by user Sunday, 11 August 2019 8:44:30 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

HK1837 Offline
#69 Posted : Sunday, 11 August 2019 2:28:59 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 12,911

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 157 time(s) in 155 post(s)
Just imagine if GMH hadn’t made the mistake of using Nissan engines and boxes and made the decision to stop building V8’s in the mid 80’s. They probably would have then kept building WB or subsequent series until at least VG release. Meaning injected 5L and 3.8L V6 plus 4L60 and T5 in the W size Holden, plus maybe even Statesman until VQ release. HDT and later HSV could have built some nice W size commercials. Ford did it with the XF transition into XG/XH, no reason GMH couldn’t have been even more successful with it.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
castellan Offline
#70 Posted : Sunday, 11 August 2019 4:04:44 PM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,294

Thanks: 12 times
Was thanked: 11 time(s) in 10 post(s)
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
Just imagine if GMH hadn’t made the mistake of using Nissan engines and boxes and made the decision to stop building V8’s in the mid 80’s. They probably would have then kept building WB or subsequent series until at least VG release. Meaning injected 5L and 3.8L V6 plus 4L60 and T5 in the W size Holden, plus maybe even Statesman until VQ release. HDT and later HSV could have built some nice W size commercials. Ford did it with the XF transition into XG/XH, no reason GMH couldn’t have been even more successful with it.


Look at how long it took Ford to come up with the XG, so you have a crappy gutless 4.1L XF carby with no EFI option ute and p van in 1988, when you had the EA Falcon ect with OHC 3.2L and 3.9L and the MPI EFI.

Now I would think Fords reasoning was for keeping the 4.1L crap was, 1 the OHC lacked low down torque of the OHV or 2 they claim that people who buy such things are not into modern tec things. but I gave them a hard time back in 1992 about the 4.1L saying I am not buying that gutless fuel using crap, not to mention that they all sprung up and started talking to each other about what I said in earnest.

When you look at the old Log 6 engines still being in Transit's and F100's till mid/1978 until they got the up dated X Flow engines.
One wonders why, well the Log six has a bit more torque right down low off the mark maybe one reason, not to mention that they did not need to run ADR27A on them, until the X Flow went in.
Then you have only low compression log 200 in Transit's and high compression 250 in the F100's.

They would of had to stock pile X amount of them old log engines to hold out for 2 years or maybe they still were casting them ?

The same thing with the XF ute from 1988 to 1992 with the X Flow, that's 4 years of stock pile, but I do believe that they were still making the 4.1L as they were making the OHC, because if I remember correctly I think that they get a up rated crank and new up rated oils seals fitted as to the old XF sedan sometime after, I think with the new 4.0L using the same pistons and maybe up rated rods.

But Ford stockpiled the V8's from 1982 to 1885 = 3 years stock pile for the F100's and not to mention the De Tomaso's got them 5.8L as well in them years.

But as for the WB running till they came out with the VG Commodore ute, sure it would of been fine but the been counters ect must off kicked that in the guts, a EFI 3.3L was a good performing engine, it had much better low down torque than the VL Nissan 3.0L and with a 5sp manual it would of been fine and it would not of been hard for Holden to make it run on unleaded, with seat inserts and better quality valves, compression would of dropped to 8.5:1 so I would of lost a bit more power. but what 5sp could they use ? or just use the 4sp manual.

I don't mind the Nissan 3.0L but a WC ute would need a lower 1st gear to get it off the mark when loaded up than the VL.
HK1837 Offline
#71 Posted : Sunday, 11 August 2019 5:06:15 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 12,911

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 157 time(s) in 155 post(s)
I think they’d decided to drop the Holden 6 and V8 well before WB ended as VL would have been locked in by then. They initially intended only to run the Nissan EFI and turbo 6’s which is probably why they stopped the W size vehicles. If they’d decided prior to convert the 5.0L to unleaded they probably would of at least kept Statesman for a while longer, maybe just V8 commercials.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
ExportHolden Offline
#72 Posted : Monday, 12 August 2019 8:29:44 AM(UTC)
ExportHolden

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/12/2009(UTC)
Posts: 94

Thanks: 2 times
Originally Posted by: wbute Go to Quoted Post

Did anyone ever work out why the column shift WB Statesman had the different three spoke steering wheel?


The column-shift WB sedan used a VC-VK two-spoke Commodore wheel. I haven't ever gotten a clear answer to why; the best clue I have is a document called 'WB Features' issued periodically by GM-H Engineering.

In that document the (aborted) WB Kingswood and Premier are described, with line drawings of relevant features eg nose/tail detail, door card trim detail. One of those drawings was for steering wheels; the Kingswood and Premier were to get the VC Commodore wheel. My guess is that GM-H decided that given the six-seater would be in some way a fleet special (as Dr Terry described) perhaps giving it a base Commodore steering wheel - which they knew would fit -- would be better than a premium single spoke wheel as used in 5-seat DeVille and Caprice.
HK1837 Offline
#73 Posted : Monday, 12 August 2019 9:10:27 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 12,911

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 157 time(s) in 155 post(s)
The WB Kingswood sedan pilot at Birdwood (assembled 9/79) has VB/VC steering wheel and seat cloth. I’m not sure if it is a Kingswood or a Kingswood SL though. There is a photo of a black one in one of Norm Darwin’s books that has the WB Statesman rear end on it, but it has no side strips which confuses the issue a bit. The one at Birdwood is the first WB assembled at Elizabeth, and the badges just say Kingswood. It is a blue 3.3L, M20 and 3.55 small Salisbury. It may have been stuffed with a bit though over time though.
Norm also states in that book that as all the bits for the WB pilots had been procured they were assembled even though the WB passenger vehicles had been canned. Apparently the GM wasn’t happy about it. I have the list of pilots somewhere, only a few were assembled.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Users browsing this topic
Guest (4)
4 Pages«<234
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2019, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.545 seconds.