Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

4 Pages<1234>
HK1837 Offline
#21 Posted : Friday, 11 December 2015 7:14:12 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,582

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
Originally Posted by: detective Go to Quoted Post
...could these 1960's 327 truck engines have been fitted to aircraft/ airfield tugs, or in a similar industrial application ?....

...for the life of me as a young teenager, I can't ever recall hearing a throbbing, big banger Chev (or otherwise) mid-range truck burbling around in the late 1960's ??


I don't think we got any here. The Chevy trucks stopped earlier in the 60's I think and weren't re-introduced until late 1974 and only as 292ci 6cyl. We didn't get a V8 one until 1979.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
FE327CHEVY Offline
#22 Posted : Friday, 11 December 2015 12:23:55 PM(UTC)
FE327CHEVY

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 8/12/2015(UTC)
Posts: 18
Australia
Location: Victoria

I read an interesting article last night that said the 6cyl Biscayne was dropped for 1967, leaving a 250 and v8 as options. The Biscayne four door code is 1539 like mine. Now my engine was made early Feb. This I'm not sure but I have read somewhere before that stolen cars or ones that had a new engine put in as replacement needed to be inspected and the local copper or rta would stamp one number on them. I'm thinking that usually the prefix ce for truck or impala codes would be done in Canada as an assigned engine in the kit. Well what if a bloke ordered a Biscayne early in the year and the dealer didn't realise the car had been dropped. Not sure if orders were hard copy but I'd think so. Then perhaps cos there were replacement engines, this one being a truck one, was there maybe the order was changed cos of this so it got the 1539 number and the big 3 number was done by the rta because the code on the vin would have then been different to the car and not matched. Either its a truck motor or Biscayne replacement in my opinion. Our impalas had the lower spec engine, rather than the 275hp and id suggest a Biscayne would have had the lowest spec.

Another thing for general discussion is that the heads on mine were also offered on 350 motors in Canada. I'm assuming that the Canadian truck plant used them for 350 trucks. Truck plant was in Flint in 1967 and further parts of mine have "F" stamps. So do you know if truck blocks were made at Saginaw then sent to Canada? It makes sense that they had tooling in Canada for my heads cos the truck plant used these heads for 283's. So I think car heads on later hk were different because of my truck heads or police or whatever, were given hardened valve seats, 3/8 guides, rotators and double valve springs and timing chains.

Did hk have double row timing chain?

So, mine also could have been a copy police car hence the number 3. Could be same scenario as I described earlier for police cars cos I read that they had to be copo optioned cos they used drum brakes to use steel wheels in your city cars. Or could have been a copo taxi.

We're the hk heads used exclusive for those years? I still think it's more likely that mine is from a low volume truck given it was a country motor. The fact that the block is Flint and that's where a major truck line was makes it even more plausible because why would they change systems for supply of blocks to Australia just for hk etc. The block I have was used in a heap of cars, all major high hp types, which makes sense too.

I'm just unsure if they had engines here for special occasions etc. Would take too long to get them made over in Canada.

Now I wanna know the specs for a police car motor lol and cabs. I think I'll ask a club if any members have any. It's cool I think how mine doesn't have any body or markings of a body or model cos its going into a custom Holden, dressed as a 50's 265. So the simpler the better.
HK1837 Offline
#23 Posted : Friday, 11 December 2015 3:01:03 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,582

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
Yours is a McKinnon block, it has a K in the assembly code. The date code will give up where it was cast which will more than likely be McKinnon. Those heads are the lowest performance heads in 1967. The HK and 1968 GMH assembled Impala/Parisienne engine were a smaller chamber but these weren't the lowest spec engine, the 210hp 2BBL 327 later replaced by the 307 2BBL was the lowest spec engine, prior to the 307 there was a 283 as well.

Those heads you have would never have been used on a 350 as the only 350 in 1967 was in Camaro SS, and these used 462 Fuelie heads. The first 350's outside of Camaro SS were in 1969.

Yes the HK 3917290 heads are 1968 only. These have the temp sender hole. They were replaced by 3927185 heads in 1969 (with accessory holes). Same deal with 462 Fuelies from 1967, for 1968 these became 3917291 and in 1969 3927186 or 3947041.

Police 327 is the same as we got here for 1968 in HK GTS327, and I think for 1967 it is what you have, ie big chamber heads for 8.5:1 compression and a 4BBL intake from the L30 275hp engine.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
FE327CHEVY Offline
#24 Posted : Friday, 11 December 2015 11:17:09 PM(UTC)
FE327CHEVY

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 8/12/2015(UTC)
Posts: 18
Australia
Location: Victoria

So the 390 cast was used and cast in Canada? I didn't think the same cast number could be made at 2 locations? I assumed the range of cars was too many to be cast outside of Saginaw. Not sure but do the hk blocks have a "t" before the date? I think they do. I would have thought cos trucks had their own line that blocks were shipped there but engines were assembled in Canada. Otherwise, why wouldn't the export cars have Canada cast blocks? I could be totally off track or confuded here. So why did tonawanda build Holden motors anyway? I know the factory did lower numbers than flint. The block I have was used in more models than available in Canada I thought. So I am wondering if Saginaw didn't mark their intakes cos they were the main foundry? Do you get me? Also, were some engines stamped here or were they all stamped with K in Canada. I didn't know if it was possible that the numbers were written down and not all stamped in Canada. We're engines all assembled over there or here. Sorry for all the questions, I'm just interested in the history. Depending on this process, my theory of blank engines kept here for special reasons could be quashed lol.
HK1837 Offline
#25 Posted : Saturday, 12 December 2015 7:15:02 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,582

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
Are you sure it is a Flint block? Is the cast date up near to the casting number or on the side?
HK and 1968 GMH Pontiac/Chevrolet blocks are Tonawanda cast and Tonawanda assembled and have a T in the assembly stamping. Same as all HT-HG GTS350 engines except for the last few manual GTS350 engines. The think the most logical reason is that McKinnon didn't cast a 4BBL intake until 1969.
It isn't unheard of blocks to be cast in one location and assembled in others. Not common though.

I think you are correct that Saginaw/Flint didn't mark castings as Flint was the original engine plant location from the start of Chevrolet whereas Tonawanda, McKinnon Industries and the one in Mexico came later.

Engines were stamped here in Australia for 1968 stuff but they already had the Tonawanda or McKinnon assembly stamping on them. The reason for this thread was to find what the 1966-1967 engines had on them.


_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
benny Offline
#26 Posted : Thursday, 31 December 2015 8:17:24 PM(UTC)
benny

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/12/2015(UTC)
Posts: 156
Australia
Location: melbourne

this is a 327 I have I think it might be out of chevy car 32712118 date is t12073q has same casting number as aussie 327 hk motor and same head casting as hk 327 series one..i bought it thinking it was the right engine for my hk Monaro,only came from sump to heads no intake block is 3914660 heads are3917290

Edited by user Thursday, 31 December 2015 8:31:55 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

HK1837 Offline
#27 Posted : Thursday, 31 December 2015 8:30:48 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,582

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
Its from a 1968 GMH assembled Impala or Parisienne, assembled in the Pagewood Sydney assembly plant. It was stamped just prior to volume Monaro and Brougham production, probably around May-June 1968. Everything is the same as GTS327 except for the sump/pickup, carby and exhaust manifold. What is the carby number? 7027212 D?
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
benny Offline
#28 Posted : Thursday, 31 December 2015 8:34:42 PM(UTC)
benny

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/12/2015(UTC)
Posts: 156
Australia
Location: melbourne

no intake or carby unfortunately, I have a couple of intakes here, some have r cast on them and some have t, which would be correct for a 327 hk ser one please..it does have a hk sump on it,which is why I thought it was correct for my hk, but have been told now by a couple of people probably Pontiac, thanks for your help I,ll keep searching..

Edited by user Thursday, 31 December 2015 8:43:00 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

HK1837 Offline
#29 Posted : Thursday, 31 December 2015 8:57:04 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,582

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
3919803 is the 1968 cast iron Quadrajet manifold. Tonawanda example should have both R and T. Original will be Kxx7 or Lxx7 cast date. Heads will be similar, I have a fair few of these in the shed.

Engine is definitely Pontiac or Chev.

Edited by user Thursday, 31 December 2015 9:03:02 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
benny Offline
#30 Posted : Thursday, 31 December 2015 9:12:25 PM(UTC)
benny

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/12/2015(UTC)
Posts: 156
Australia
Location: melbourne

ok thanks have a few of these 3919803 inlets and just noticed that some had r and some t must not have looked properly..trying to collect bits for my warwick 81837 its a Sydney build, thought I was onto a real winner with that engine being a Sydney build,oh well only paid 300 for the engine,so not to much of a disappointment..slowly finding the bits I am missing.is there anyway I could find out when my car was built from the id numbers its h5 so I am pretty sure that's Sydney, yellow with Goya red 12x
benny Offline
#31 Posted : Thursday, 31 December 2015 9:24:35 PM(UTC)
benny

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/12/2015(UTC)
Posts: 156
Australia
Location: melbourne

one of the intakes does have a r and t on it has cast e 24 8 and a big b next to it..another one is c 16 8 with a big s next to it..don't know if there correct for a hk or not..any help appreciated..

Edited by user Thursday, 31 December 2015 9:28:00 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

HK1837 Offline
#32 Posted : Friday, 1 January 2016 7:14:28 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,582

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
Originally Posted by: benny Go to Quoted Post
one of the intakes does have a r and t on it has cast e 24 8 and a big b next to it..another one is c 16 8 with a big s next to it..don't know if there correct for a hk or not..any help appreciated..


Pretty close to right. The C168 could easily have been off one of the first batch of Tonawanda GTS327 engines, more than likely off a T0319 or T0320 engine. The E248 is possibly off the last batch Tonawanda GTS327 engine but these were July so unlikely. This one is more than likely an imported one or off an Impala/Parisienne.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
HK1837 Offline
#33 Posted : Friday, 1 January 2016 7:26:18 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,582

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
Originally Posted by: benny Go to Quoted Post
ok thanks have a few of these 3919803 inlets and just noticed that some had r and some t must not have looked properly..trying to collect bits for my warwick 81837 its a Sydney build, thought I was onto a real winner with that engine being a Sydney build,oh well only paid 300 for the engine,so not to much of a disappointment..slowly finding the bits I am missing.is there anyway I could find out when my car was built from the id numbers its h5 so I am pretty sure that's Sydney, yellow with Goya red 12x


Get me the cars numbers, both tags and number on the firewall and will get you an estimate for the engine number. I wouldn't bother chasing too hard for another engine, you aren't going to get much closer than what you have! I know it isn't a Holden engine but it is the same thing and was stamped by GMH.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
benny Offline
#34 Posted : Friday, 1 January 2016 10:05:24 AM(UTC)
benny

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/12/2015(UTC)
Posts: 156
Australia
Location: melbourne

sorry to hijack your post with all these questions, skinny tag reads 81837h519141..large tag 81837kr00106-h5 trim 12x paint 56810846,
HK1837 Offline
#35 Posted : Friday, 1 January 2016 10:26:47 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,582

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
I'll go looking at my data. The firewall number may help to nail it even closer. HK28xxxSS or thereabouts.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Rusty HQ Offline
#36 Posted : Friday, 1 January 2016 10:33:51 AM(UTC)
Rusty HQ

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/10/2011(UTC)
Posts: 19

Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
Just wondering if anyone here knows anyone with a very original one of these complete with its original 4BBL 327 engine?

These are very elusive cars. The 1968 versions with the same engine as the HK are pretty plentiful both here and in the USA, but the L73 4BBL 327 was a COPO only option in 1966-1967 in the USA and Canada, and normally only on Police vehicles.

We are trying to find one to see where its engine was sourced from, ie is it a Flint or Tonawanda engine, what sort of engine number GMH added (if any) and what carby they got, plus other similar stuff.



A year or 2 back I had the original 327 from my RHD Impala rebuilt. Once it was cleaned and stripped, I took photo's of every number, marking, etc that I could find.

I know the carby wasn't original. I checked the numbers from that, and it was from a mid-70's Californian (smog regulations) built Big Block.

Any interest in me posting the images?
HK1837 Offline
#37 Posted : Friday, 1 January 2016 11:02:20 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,582

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
Certainly, would be worth looking at.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
benny Offline
#38 Posted : Tuesday, 5 January 2016 4:30:07 PM(UTC)
benny

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/12/2015(UTC)
Posts: 156
Australia
Location: melbourne

just spoken to a bloke with a factory 307 ute hk, have you ever heard of a 307 engine number with a p in it , he is the second owner of the car and bought it of his uncle and swears the engine has never been replaced it is 307P2951, also the firewall number has a p in it under the a for Adelaide build,firewall is 43924A with the P under it.. thanks..

Edited by user Tuesday, 5 January 2016 4:31:37 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Warren Turnbull Offline
#39 Posted : Wednesday, 6 January 2016 6:57:54 AM(UTC)
Warren Turnbull

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 10/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,355

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 26 post(s)
If the chassis number ends in A and has a P under it the body was assembled in Adelaide and then sent to Perth for final assembly. If it is a factory 307 vehicle then the engine number will be between 30790000 and 30799999.

Could it be that someone has read the 9 as a P? or has it definitely got a P, photo would be great.

The engine number would also make it the 2952 V8 HK assembled in Perth. Sydney took about 4 months to make that V8 engine cars, so this would be a late build as Perth was much smaller.

Warren
HK1837 Offline
#40 Posted : Wednesday, 6 January 2016 12:31:28 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,582

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
Originally Posted by: benny Go to Quoted Post
sorry to hijack your post with all these questions, skinny tag reads 81837h519141..large tag 81837kr00106-h5 trim 12x paint 56810846,


Benny

Before you go spending $ restoring this car i'd go and get it checked out, especially the tags. Neither the VIN plate or the BODY plate appear to be original GMH stamped plates. If you got the car with that Impala/Parisienne engine my guess is someone got a VIN plate made up for a GTS327 using the VIN plate off the Chev/Pontiac. The PSN dates this VIN plate around late 4/68 - way before Pagewood assembled a Monaro let alone a GTS327. The BODY plate has issues too that indicate it is non-original. If who you got it from is still around i'd be chasing them up, if they wont come to the party seek the Police.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.197 seconds.