Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

5 Pages«<345
treborsenrab Offline
#81 Posted : Sunday, 19 March 2006 6:26:17 AM(UTC)
treborsenrab

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 1/09/2005(UTC)
Posts: 146

Shes looking better and better all the time mate.
gotta agree with the above comments on the engine bay appearance.
yeah, theres no substitute for cubic inches, but im with you on the 6.
C u at the show


If It Aint Broke- Dont Fix It, Modify It!
be an innovator, not a imitator
Guest
#82 Posted : Wednesday, 22 March 2006 9:07:56 PM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Cheers rob! Just wait til im home this time... The battery wont be in the engine bay, nor will anything that doesnt need to be! Wiring is being hidden, and im going to do some more painting of parts (things i should have done with the engine out)... Ill also be taking the UC in to get a Dyno tune, so i should have a Dyno HP readout to post up too... Exciting stuff hey!

Keith

Guest
#83 Posted : Wednesday, 29 March 2006 5:30:22 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Well guys.... Its official! I have the UC back, with the 350 Holley on it still, and while its not the most horsepower, its certainly a good result in anyones speak!

The average of the three runs was 96.3rwkW (about 130HP in old speak), and the highest of the three runs was 101.2rwkW, so roughly 135HP!!

Heres the average run printout!



It unfortunately doesnt say what rpm its at, but he said he took it up to about 6500rpm, max HP was at 5800rpm, so im pleased about that! But the better news is that there is no longer a flat spot in the carby... He bored out the metering block, fitted 3 times larger jets and replaced the accelerator pump, after fiddling around and setting the timing to 9deg btdc, it was all peachy!

Gimme your thoughts guys!

Keith

treborsenrab Offline
#84 Posted : Sunday, 16 April 2006 8:59:51 AM(UTC)
treborsenrab

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 1/09/2005(UTC)
Posts: 146

cant complain about that.remember what bhp the 202 lj xu-1s were putting out?,yeah ok, they were a bit lighter... but u doing well enuf.

If It Aint Broke- Dont Fix It, Modify It!
be an innovator, not a imitator
Guest
#85 Posted : Monday, 17 April 2006 2:39:57 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
The old LJs had about 190Hp so thats about almost 140kws, but that was at the flywheel and with tripples and 10. something compression.

Forgive me if im wrong but i think its pretty close to these specs.

Football, Meat pies, Kangaroos and Holden cars
Guest
#86 Posted : Monday, 17 April 2006 11:25:54 PM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
very nice work!!!
its always good to see how much work poeple put into their cars.
Have you thought about putting more chrome in the engine bay?
just a thought not criticising your effort to detail.
cheers...
Guest
#87 Posted : Wednesday, 19 April 2006 10:50:52 PM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Lol, as much as i like chrome, i think ill keep with the silver look in the bay! Its just a break from the chrome!

I have spent so many man hours on my UC, lots of beer has gone down, and many late nights just admiring it!! Its sometimes too hard to walk from the garage into my bedroom... The g/f is getting a bit upset with me!

Keith

Guest
#88 Posted : Wednesday, 10 May 2006 3:46:41 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Guest
#89 Posted : Wednesday, 10 May 2006 6:28:15 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
nice paul

Nothing beats cubic inches !!!
Guest
#90 Posted : Wednesday, 10 May 2006 10:04:08 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Well done paul - ive seen this before and admired your work! How did the VT buckets fit into the front, and the rears into the back (Obviously the only way they would respectively go)!!

Cheers
Keith

Guest
#91 Posted : Friday, 14 July 2006 9:05:38 PM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Ok guys, the wheels are on. Everything is happenin! And I rekon they look damn sexy too.

Wheels are 16" by 7", the tyres are 205/50/16 on the front, and 225/50/16 on the back. Tyres are Yokohama AR01.

Heres the pics i took today, enjoy!







But just to recap, lately ive got the stainless exhaust fitted, and now the wheels... WHAT COULD BE NEXT???

Cheers
Keith

boom Offline
#92 Posted : Tuesday, 15 August 2006 9:17:42 PM(UTC)
boom

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/02/2006(UTC)
Posts: 990

Hey mate, if you still have your old 202 heres a link to make your mouth water.
http://www.carpoint.com....internallink.asp?id=7229



Guest
#93 Posted : Thursday, 16 November 2006 3:55:07 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Wow, thats a beautiful UC.

Ive always loved the UC, by far the best looking of all the Toranas in stock form.
Guest
#94 Posted : Monday, 20 November 2006 11:45:50 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Thanks jamie!! Its good to hear positive feedback!

Just a quick note, i met up with Zac on Saturday in his home town! I just so happened to overtake him on the highway and pulled in at KFC and had a quick yarn with him! Was good to meet ya Zac!

Cheers
Keith

Guest
#95 Posted : Friday, 24 November 2006 4:23:43 PM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
love the car
Guest
#96 Posted : Thursday, 14 December 2006 8:41:37 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Cheers lhl!!

Ive got just a quick update on the UC... The 179 is coming out very soon. Its replacement will be dispacement... I have 2 motors with my eye on them - a 308 which has a very angry cam or a crate 350chev. Both will cost the same to fit to the UC, but only 1 will make some very serious horsepower. So when ive made the decision on the motor, ill let you know!

Cheers
Keith

adam PERTH Offline
#97 Posted : Sunday, 5 August 2007 10:44:51 AM(UTC)
adam PERTH

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 3/08/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,902

Keith, do you know what jet size and power valve size worked best on the Dyno for you in the 350 Holley?

as for the V8, why dont you put a chev pattern 308 Holden in(cheaper), with turbo 350 auto,($1200.?est) and when you get over that, the 350 chev crate conversion will be straight forward.

UC wit HP?, works for me! i am a subscriber!

Being a Bogan is finally paying dividends.
Old holdens brought on the spot, quick decision, cash paid.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages«<345
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.099 seconds.