Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

Guest
#1 Posted : Sunday, 28 May 2006 4:15:29 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Hello All,
Can anyone shed any light on how to identify steel crank/cast crank Holden red motors?
The EH club of Vic has some info in their site about how to identify what engine came out in what model car.... http://www.ehholden.com.au/ejehreg.htm
....but from what I am aware steel cranks only came out in 179HP's. I have heard elsewhere that all 186 and all engine models before 186 had steel cranks.
Also what is the difference between 186S (dual carbs and headers) and 186HP (single carb), 186A, etc. Are there cast/steel crank or compression differences?
A book or website on this subject would be great.
Thanks.
Guest
#2 Posted : Sunday, 28 May 2006 8:06:43 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
All EH and HD manuals and 186 X2/S manuals except 4 speed have the same steel crank part number 7420147. The 179HP is bull s*** explained enough on this forum without me having to do again.

There are also different steel cranks for auto and 4 speed S e
JBM Offline
#3 Posted : Sunday, 28 May 2006 8:09:49 AM(UTC)
JBM

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/03/2006(UTC)
Posts: 810

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Which model 186S are you asking about.

The X2 in the HR had twin carbs, the 186S replaced the X2 and had a 2 barrel single carb. Both had twin headers. The 186S carried through to the HT. Compression was 9.2:1 for all 186 engines and the Hi-comp 161. E

You only have to be in front at the end of the race.
johnperth Offline
#4 Posted : Sunday, 28 May 2006 10:26:16 AM(UTC)
johnperth

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,991

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
You can tell the cast crank from steel crank by using an angle grinder and touching a part of the crank, maybe the tip of the nose won't hurt anything. If it is steel there will be a shower of sparks, if cast there will be very few sparks. you don't need
Guest
#5 Posted : Sunday, 28 May 2006 11:50:23 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Ok, I typed the post quickly and meant to type dual throat carb.
So Warren you are saying that the only difference between a 179HP engine and a 179 are just the HP has a higher compression ratio. From your comments the cranks ae obviously the same. I wi
Dr Terry Offline
#6 Posted : Sunday, 28 May 2006 5:40:08 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,071

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 209 time(s) in 190 post(s)
Hi Vern.

What Warren is saying is that the HP & the 179 are identical. The HP casting ID was used on all early 179s to differentiate it from the 149 which had no casting ID. The is nothing special or different about an HP 179 compared to the late EH &
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
Guest
#7 Posted : Monday, 29 May 2006 6:16:06 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Ok Dr Terry thanks. That makes sense as the EH I had in the 80's and 90's was a 65 model and it had 179 cast into it.
Ok then, all 3.00" stroke red motors being 149 to 186 have the same crank fitted...good.
Yes I thought the only difference in the cra
Guest
#8 Posted : Monday, 29 May 2006 6:35:23 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Sorry typo.....
Ok then, all 3.00" stroke red motors being 149 to 186 have the same crank fitted...good.
I should have typed.... all 149 to 186 before April 1967 had the same steel crank and after April 1967 unless it's a 186S, it had a cast iron cran
Guest
#9 Posted : Tuesday, 30 May 2006 4:39:48 PM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
To JBM, all 186S engines have steel crank as stated by Terry above. The X2 and S engine in the HR have a different prefix but the HR S engine is the same as the HK one. The headers though are different the S engine has auto choke provision and X2 does not
HK1837 Offline
#10 Posted : Tuesday, 30 May 2006 6:54:31 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,747

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 520 time(s) in 496 post(s)
Warren
I thought the HR X2 and S engines were all 186K prefixed on their engine number.

OOps. I think I misread your post, meaning HR X2 and S are different in prefix to the HK 186S, but the HR and HK 186S are the same engine.

Edited by user Wednesday, 31 May 2006 3:52:22 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
JBM Offline
#11 Posted : Tuesday, 30 May 2006 7:07:16 PM(UTC)
JBM

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/03/2006(UTC)
Posts: 810

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Terrys book only mentions that both headers are twin, not their differences. Good to get more info wherever possible on the differences.

When I said that the 186S carried through to the HT I should have said that it was also used in the HK and HG also.

You only have to be in front at the end of the race.
Guest
#12 Posted : Wednesday, 31 May 2006 5:28:34 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
and for your future reference
http://www.monaroparts.com/Engines.htm

there are no stupid questions, only stupid people
Guest
#13 Posted : Wednesday, 31 May 2006 8:17:59 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Ok, this site is good as it's more comprehensive than some others that I have seen. Pity there is none of the technical info in there too. I guess it's one of those experience things and is to be learnt over time and/or trial and error....
I am amazed th
HK1837 Offline
#14 Posted : Wednesday, 31 May 2006 6:54:02 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,747

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 520 time(s) in 496 post(s)
People have tried, and either go in with half the facts (not to mention any particular book/publication) or do a comprehensive job (like Warren Turnbull, Ben Stewart and Dr Terry) but can struggle to sell enough to make it viable. The 'net is a far better
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Guest
#15 Posted : Thursday, 1 June 2006 9:33:05 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Understandable Byron. Carburetted engines from a mainstream society perspective are really past their used by date now, but you would think there would have been something done in the 70's seeing as every second household owned a red motor.
I'll keep loo
HK1837 Offline
#16 Posted : Thursday, 1 June 2006 10:42:28 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,747

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 520 time(s) in 496 post(s)
Remember though that the 'red' motor as such was only half way through it's life as a 6cyl in 1974 (1963-1985). The V8 lasted until 2000 in a VSIII. No-one particularly had any reason to be interested or enthused about what was then a current model.
The
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
JBM Offline
#17 Posted : Friday, 2 June 2006 1:57:00 AM(UTC)
JBM

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/03/2006(UTC)
Posts: 810

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
The only why to have a definitive book is to pool resources and information, otherwise like Byron said its too much work for just one person.

As forum members we could promote and purchase said book to increase its circulation and viability.

When I

You only have to be in front at the end of the race.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.137 seconds.