Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

4 Pages<1234>
HK1837 Offline
#21 Posted : Friday, 9 December 2016 5:42:14 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
Originally Posted by: wbute Go to Quoted Post
And the big question... why is your font bigger than everyone else HK??


Huh? What do you mean?

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
HK1837 Offline
#22 Posted : Friday, 9 December 2016 5:50:18 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
Originally Posted by: wbute Go to Quoted Post
I will just look at how important Holden is to GM in 2016. Not very as it turns out.


They are both totally different companies today to what they were in 1965. Just like any Company that has survived over 50 years things change as does their leadership and their products. Not saying it as a defence but that you cannot really judge the 1965 version of the company by the company today.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Dr Terry Offline
#23 Posted : Friday, 9 December 2016 6:29:32 AM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
Originally Posted by: gm5735 Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: stevo Go to Quoted Post
What did GM do for Australia this century? Apart from Bleed our government dry?


Apart from thousands employed directly by the manufacturing facility, tens of thousands employed in the supply chain and service industries, the hundreds of engineers, technicians, drafters, tradespersons, and mechanics who gained experience training and education in advanced technologies, and the hundreds of millions of dollars of business and payg tax revenue collected, yes you're right of course. Nothing contributed.


You beat me to it gm. The only trick part of the question is "this century", but what you say is still correct though.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
stevo Offline
#24 Posted : Friday, 9 December 2016 8:30:26 AM(UTC)
stevo

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/08/2016(UTC)
Posts: 44

Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 4 post(s)
So what percentage of the VE & VF are imported? How much Land were they given in the beginning?
You blokes can **** off as many yanks as you like **** you all

Edited by user Friday, 9 December 2016 8:55:37 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Removed expletives

GM bleed us dry and run away.
gm5735 Offline
#25 Posted : Friday, 9 December 2016 9:48:02 AM(UTC)
gm5735

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/04/2014(UTC)
Posts: 768
Man
Location: Victoria

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 47 post(s)
Originally Posted by: stevo Go to Quoted Post
So what percentage of the VE & VF are imported? How much Land were they given in the beginning?
You blokes can **** off as many yanks as you like **** you all


I omitted to mention that Holden managed to produce some good products this century too.

I have no personal affinity for the US business model, and believe that Holden was and is a far different company than what GM is in the US, producing a very different product for a very different market.
The real loser in all of this will be Australia, as you say, because of the loss of self sufficiency and exposure at a manufacturing level to current technology.

As far as your other comments go, as much as I salute your passion, you really should strive to obtain some words with more than four letters, in order to be taken a little more seriously.
castellan Offline
#26 Posted : Friday, 9 December 2016 3:34:24 PM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Originally Posted by: stevo Go to Quoted Post
So what percentage of the VE & VF are imported? How much Land were they given in the beginning?
You blokes can **** off as many yanks as you like **** you all

Why bro ! why so much hate.
Thing is what could we here in Australia do without company's like GM and Ford, so without them, we would be building just some 3rd rate backward total rubbish cars.
We had nothing of there ability's, just look at all the country's of the world and what they built on there own, just look at some of the rubbish cars the Pommy's had built d'oh! even after WW2 what a joke that some of them were, and that's the UK so to mention other lesser nations ability's Anxious so what have we got to look up to then.

The Yanks were a great people once and history proved that they were great! they have been in decline due to moronic crap like Political Correctness that's brain washing them with cunning satanic communist trash feed by the media that's sadly way over run by the so called Jews, that are not truly Jews at all, but just a cunning mob claiming to be Jews by stealth, this mob are of Moloch etc and the Bible points it all out.
Jews are not a race and never have been, it's a religion and the word Jew means, The people of God and Israel means The Servants of God and Hebrew was a race.
GM was run by true Jews and that's why they were so great because they had the brains how to do it all.
What person could look down on GM ability's in history or what USA once was.

stevo Australia is going down the drain as well, as is all of Europe morally due to PCness people now don't have the ability to think for themselves any more, so they look to the PC Nazis to do that for them, the poor degenerate gutless good for nothing slobs, the only thing they can do is shout people down and work to destroy everything they can, due to there feelings being hurt by words that offend there short sighted narrow minded foolish Marxist utopia.

We had a great thing going here with GM and Ford, I could just imagine a fully Aussie car it would of been just a backward shit box, remembering back at most old people born before 1950's what they wanted in a car was bugger all and were happy driving gutless ill handling crap and when I mentioned that a car can be designed that to push it hard around corners was a pleasure to do, they all took offence to such a things.
I drove a 928 Porsche if only Aussie performance cars were designed like that to drivePray
tuckerbag Offline
#27 Posted : Monday, 12 December 2016 8:41:49 AM(UTC)
tuckerbag

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 5/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 24

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Anything i ever had to do with opel has been a disarster. Total garbage. Theres noway i'll be buying any chinese/ european/korean made opel/ holden tacked together garbage with about as much feelgood factor as a lightbulb. I'll be keeping my e2 clubby till it rots
HGV8 Offline
#28 Posted : Monday, 12 December 2016 11:59:01 AM(UTC)
HGV8

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 420

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 9 post(s)
I had a new 01 vectra JS2 V6. Great car and to be honest, the build quality was streets ahead of the 97 VT I trade in for it and lot more reliable.
j.williams
Dr Terry Offline
#29 Posted : Monday, 12 December 2016 1:25:34 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
Originally Posted by: HGV8 Go to Quoted Post
I had a new 01 vectra JS2 V6. Great car and to be honest, the build quality was streets ahead of the 97 VT I trade in for it and lot more reliable.


I'd have to agree. My wife's daily driver for about 8 years was a JSII Olympic edition wagon. It served us well & had over 200,000 km on when we sold it.

Likewise both my daughters own Astras, one a TS & the other an AH. The TS needed an ECU at 160,000 km (quite common, but an easy fix) & now has over 270,000 km on it. Other than that she has spent nothing more on it other than service, tyres & rego etc.

The AH has proven to be even more bulletproof.

Dr Terry

Edited by user Monday, 12 December 2016 1:26:42 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
HK1837 Offline
#30 Posted : Monday, 12 December 2016 4:27:07 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
I've had my Thai made 2011 SR5 dual cab 4x4 Hilux for 5 years and 80,000kM now and it has been faultless. Admittedly it has a full Japanese made motor and box (out of the Landcruiser plant), and like all Japanese designed stuff the standard tyres, brakes and suspension are not all that flash (and I have upgraded all of them), but everything else in the car has performed flawlessly including the front and curtain airbags when I had a head on in the identical 2010 version of this one that it replaced. Some of the plastics may not prove as good as old Holden stuff (up to VZ anyway as I think most VE-VF plastics are from Korea), but i'll turn it over as soon as a manufacturer makes something better, like a V8 Ranger or the like. So in the end I can't see imported stuff being that bad quality wise, my biggest gripe is the engines are too small or they are all common rail diesels that I won't touch.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
castellan Offline
#31 Posted : Monday, 12 December 2016 11:40:59 PM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
The main problem is FW drive with a big car is not a car that enthusiast would love to drive.
My wife has a new Toyota Aurion it's just transport, it gets up and goes well enough but I would never want to buy one, but it does the job for her, she hated the Camry said it was gutless and the engine was not smooth as the V6 Aurion, so that's a good thing for me haha, but on trips loaded up, it goes well in 1st and 2ed gear but once it hits 3rd I am like hell were is the power gone, but it's bloody good on fuel.
I have dragged of a VF SV6 in it, I drove a VF SV6 bloody noisy exhaust they have was the one thing I did not like and it was not as nippy taking off as the Aurion.
HK1837 Offline
#32 Posted : Tuesday, 13 December 2016 5:39:36 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
My Mrs's 2011 Lexus RX350SL uses the same engine as the V6 Aurion I think, 204kW 2GR-FE. For a 2tonne slug it goes really well, and these are permanent AWD, FWD normally and run the rears as required. Doesn't have the punch of the V2 CV8 it replaced as her daily buy it still is impressive and it is significantly heavier. I'd like another 75kW, but you can get an RX450h which has the 183kW 2GR-FXE engine with electric motors on the rear wheels for a 220kWtotal, these have significantly more go but are 200kg heavier.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
wbute Offline
#33 Posted : Tuesday, 13 December 2016 5:48:18 AM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Bland. That's what the choices are going to be from now on.
As for Australia needing the US to show us how to build a car? Right. The yanks built evil handling sponges with big lazy motors. The poms built good handling gutless oil leakers. We took the best of both and ended up with mostly good handling and performing cars. I can guarantee that the 1980 Buick Century I owned while living in Canada in 1997 wasn't anywhere near as good a car as anything that was built in 1980 in Australia. It had a 5 litre V8 that would have dragged a mighty boy off and they didn't offer the ability to wind the rear windows down! You could only open the rear quarter windows! As for the interior. Big floppy lounge chairs that would have been ok in a movie cinema.
Anyway, seems some people think we wouldn't be able to do it on our own. Strange because I am fairly sure we could.

Edited by user Tuesday, 13 December 2016 5:49:06 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Typo

Tour Director Offline
#34 Posted : Tuesday, 13 December 2016 7:57:51 AM(UTC)
Tour Director

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 451
Man
Australia

Was thanked: 15 time(s) in 14 post(s)
Interesting to note that both GMH and Ford are extending their design, prototype and testing divisions here in Melbourne for global vehicles.It seems they both have the expertise locally. Unfortunately building cars here is where it has all gone down the tube.The economics and logistics just didn't weigh up in the end.Nissan found out years ago it was more viable to import than to build and eventually all the others followed.
castellan Offline
#35 Posted : Tuesday, 13 December 2016 9:49:50 AM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Originally Posted by: wbute Go to Quoted Post
Bland. That's what the choices are going to be from now on.
As for Australia needing the US to show us how to build a car? Right. The yanks built evil handling sponges with big lazy motors. The poms built good handling gutless oil leakers. We took the best of both and ended up with mostly good handling and performing cars. I can guarantee that the 1980 Buick Century I owned while living in Canada in 1997 wasn't anywhere near as good a car as anything that was built in 1980 in Australia. It had a 5 litre V8 that would have dragged a mighty boy off and they didn't offer the ability to wind the rear windows down! You could only open the rear quarter windows! As for the interior. Big floppy lounge chairs that would have been ok in a movie cinema.
Anyway, seems some people think we wouldn't be able to do it on our own. Strange because I am fairly sure we could.


As for the USA cars, my dad bought a 1971 model LTD Galaxie it was made in Feb 1972 the compliance plate said, it was a full import but the right hand conversions were done here by Ford Aus it was a lot better built car than the aussie P5 LTD, as it had rear coil springs and a pan hard rod just like the HZ Holden got in 1977, the shocks were what the yanks like just floating ride mentality but dad put Koni adjustable shocks on it and it turned a bucket of s--t into a good handling car just like you could with a HQ Holden and if you know how to tweak the wheel alignment settings it can make a one hell of a difference.

I think the problem with the yanks is that boring dopy people don't demand much from there cars and that's why they made the FW drive big cars and a lot of rubbish cars, but if you go to Germany you see people were much better informed and drove at much higher speeds and they made cars for such. even Peter Hannenberger the Holden RTS man came to aus and showed what could be done to our HQ Holden and he made the VB commodore handle like magic, but most Ausies did not have the ability to drive a car like that, so he made the VC understeer for the dopy morons.
Them ADR27A engines could easy be sorted by anyone who knew what to do to make them go well.
castellan Offline
#36 Posted : Tuesday, 13 December 2016 10:02:20 AM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Tour Director Go to Quoted Post
Interesting to note that both GMH and Ford are extending their design, prototype and testing divisions here in Melbourne for global vehicles.It seems they both have the expertise locally. Unfortunately building cars here is where it has all gone down the tube.The economics and logistics just didn't weigh up in the end.Nissan found out years ago it was more viable to import than to build and eventually all the others followed.


I have a relation that worked for Ford USA and he came down to test cars here in Aus out in the wop wop but he said at the time that the Australian Government only went out of there way to destroy any such hope of Ford USA doing any such test and that was back in the 80's he said everyone was so f ing angry at how they were treated by our backward Government at the time.
Silverfox Offline
#37 Posted : Sunday, 18 December 2016 2:20:22 PM(UTC)
Silverfox

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/11/2008(UTC)
Posts: 435

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
....YIPPEEE TOUR DIRECTOR!

I am so excited to see this wonderful new model....NOT!

So the General and Ford have just stuck it to Australia by abandoning local manufacture. Holden have the gall to retain the Commodore badge. At least Ford retired the Falcon badge. Holden and Ford have both become also ran brands in Australia and they would have a hide if either expect brand loyalty after betraying Australian customers. It is a two way street.

They have used comments like buying public are no longer interested in a large rear drive sedans. But neither did anything to create a local more modern platform. We have just been plunged into the mainstream Global market. As motorists we have just lost the last bit of individuality on Aussie roads.

Comments about manufacture in Australia being too expensive is codswallop ......The Yanks, Japs and Euros have all retained their manufacturing plants (albeit not all of them). GM-H had up until recently a proud reputation for export.....and to countries where it would be cheaper to build the same car.

GM-H you have and will, put thousands out of work directly and indirectly.

So shame on you GM-H. I can't see a new Holden in my garage any time soon. You don't care about the Aussie motoring scene. Just like the rest we are just another place where you can make a big profit so your fat @rsed execs can overpay themselves.

Up yours General Motors and Ford.

Cheers
Nick.
"HOLDEN MONARO. OUT TO DRIVE YOU WILD!"
castellan Offline
#38 Posted : Monday, 19 December 2016 11:31:02 AM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
The thing is they never truly wanted to come here in the first place, it was only due to the Government that made it so and it was due to the Government that they are going.

Holden could of stayed on now, due to our low Dollar and could of made it work if the government wanted it to.

Profits ? investment needs such to work, I can't see anywhere that they made outrageous percentage on there investments in Australia.

Some people see millions being made as profits, but they don't understand that it's the percentage that it counts on them investing, not to mention that the figures put forward are before tax and a lot of other things could be added into it all, but the media or the average duded in the street would not have a clue about and nor do they care because they are ignorant and I think a lot of this crap comes from cunning Unions spinning a hole lot of communistic crap, crying that someone is making more money than the dolt worker, not fair prickly pear !
abi Offline
#39 Posted : Monday, 19 December 2016 9:31:11 PM(UTC)
abi

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 70

Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 4 post(s)
Remember GM decided back in 2007 or so that there will not be a locally developed platform after the then released VE (later VF). At that time engineering turned to developing the 5th gen camaro from the VE platform and when that was finished engineering were loosing hundreds staff at a time due to retrenchments. I recall 400 let go at one time and a further 600 later the same year. GM said at the time the VE and VF would run for 6 years and be replaced by the impala but locally assembled. All this rot began back then 8 years ago. If any book is writen about Holden's fall from grace then Peter Hannenburger should be interviewed as I feel he was holdens best director of all time and had the finger on the pulse.
Lingus Offline
#40 Posted : Saturday, 14 January 2017 1:11:20 AM(UTC)
Lingus

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/09/2016(UTC)
Posts: 32
Australia
Location: Perth

Thanks: 6 times
Just read today that Holden will close its Elizabeth plant on Friday 20th October 2017, which is similar timing to what Ford did last year ... but in this instance, Holden's plant closes two weeks after the running of the Bathurst 1000.

It will be interesting to see whether Caprice and Ute make it through to October, or will they be culled earlier ? ... with the end of Caprice and Commodore, so too will be the end of our Chevrolet exports to the USA and the Middle East, the latter of which has been receiving our left-hook cars since the late 1990s !

So, when does the "new" Commodore arrive ? ... Monday 23rd October 2017 ?
Users browsing this topic
Guest (5)
4 Pages<1234>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.222 seconds.