Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

6 Pages<1234>»
HK1837 Offline
#21 Posted : Friday, 16 December 2016 10:21:58 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
GMH trained their sales staff in how to sell out of GMH stock rather than have a car ordered. Ordered cars were a pain, here are two examples:

My HJ Premier. It was ordered in early October 1974. Buyer wanted: L31, M41, LSD, air, steer, buckets, console shift, power windows, power antenna, heated rear window, U17 dash, wide wheels, group3 metallic (sepia). So you can imagine it had to be ordered. It was supposed to be ready for Xmas Holidays, but wasn't, so dealer had to provide a loan vehicle. It is a Pagewood build and complianced 12/74 so it was essentially complete in 12/74 as the ADR tag went on near last at Pagewood. However it wasn't completed until 2/75. Pain for the dealer.

In 2002? I ordered a VY SS manual ute. It was white, only options being leather trim and dealer fitted tub liner and tow bar. From memory it was late December. I organised a good trade in price for my 2 year old VS ute. VY didn't arrive until May the next year. Dealer had to let me continue to drive and add kM on the VS. Pain for the dealer.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Silverfox Offline
#22 Posted : Saturday, 17 December 2016 12:51:15 PM(UTC)
Silverfox

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/11/2008(UTC)
Posts: 435

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
OK... my 20 cents worth.

I have driven the car and been well and truly over and under it.

All of the cop stuff is true. Owner 1 lives locally. Been retired for many years and was living in the Police Station House just off the Pacific Hwy on the far North NSW Coast when he bought the car new. He was a cop all his working life, was respected and connected within the Force and as things rolled back then would have been able to make a call or two to make all of this happen.Various Police Forces were directly involved with the creation of specifications/ requrirements for their fleets. So in one way or another "The Old Boys' Club" existed. The availability of the Falcon XRGT was partly due to the Victorian Police requirement for a good, fast pursuit car. The Same can be said about the Police spec Morris Cooper 'S', Studebakers, Toranas, plain Jane pov pack 350 engine HT Monaros for VicPol, Valiant Chargers etc.

Haven't heard anything of the security guard thing. But could prob ask and find out more.


Owner 1 told me he used to occasionally use it instead of his 202 Q'ey sedan for covert runs up the Pacific Highway. Back in the day,GTHOs-Monaros etc were known to do the bolt out in the bush as it was known that there weren't many Police cars around. The man and his machine were known in the area. There are many locals who can recall it.... Not just me.

Ben S knows of the car and can confirm it was built. Also confirmed to me it is definitely one of one.

The mods were arranged and/or done by owner 1. He is a petrolhead. Just like most of us who were around in the 1980s he did not hesitate to modify it in line with his tastes of the day. By the way, it goes hard and reckon it would run late thirteens/ early fourteens over 400m. Cars set up like this were common in the 70s/80s/90s.

Owner 1 kept ALL of the parts removed from the car and he told me they would go with the car for an additional cost. Owner two could have bought them. I do not know.

I have about 100 unpublished pics of it some of which are in different areas to those shown on Mike Selby's site.

It is easy to make uninformed comments about a car you have only heard of or maybe saw briefly at a car show. $100k is certainly top dollar but I know what the owner paid and I can say that other (lesser) cars like HKTG 186/253/307/308 cars have achieved a much higher percentage return on cost over the same period.

That said I also understand the despite being a one-off it is a white/brown colour combo HQ350 manual Kingswood. A GTS is a GTS and is of course more desirable generally.

Cheers

NICK.

Edited by user Saturday, 17 December 2016 1:15:11 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

"HOLDEN MONARO. OUT TO DRIVE YOU WILD!"
detective Offline
#23 Posted : Sunday, 18 December 2016 8:41:42 PM(UTC)
detective

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 307

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 11 time(s) in 11 post(s)
I reckon Warranty should be mentioned in amongst all of this. A dealer optioned, specced up banger could be had ...(in a perfect world), but a factory produced, line fitted production car is something else again .

....Nice stories, but not any shred of truth to a "real deal" factory optioned, "non dealer" offered car. This notion would throw a whole heap of jeopardy at the internal workings of how any mass production line works....
HK1837 Offline
#24 Posted : Sunday, 18 December 2016 8:52:46 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
The car is not a dealer build, it was built by GMH.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Silverfox Offline
#25 Posted : Sunday, 18 December 2016 10:03:40 PM(UTC)
Silverfox

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/11/2008(UTC)
Posts: 435

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Detective.

All of your theories are probable and respect to you but in this case the car is honest. Just like its first and second owners.

The shreds of truth lie in numerous pieces of evidence. E.G. Log books, sales receipts and many local people who still happen to be around who can make comments about the owner and his car. Also people like Ben and Byron who have seen it.

The car had its first exposure to the general public a the Warwick Monaro Nationals. Then and since it has been checked out by a number of respected and highly knowledgable people within the Holden fraternity. As such it is largely agreed that the car is bonafide.

The first owner never showed the car. Nor was he a member of a car club. He simply enjoyed and kept the car he loved until he felt he was getting old and it was time to move it on. He kept it immaculate. When I called Ben with the I.D info when it was first for sale he quickly found its record and told me it is one of one. He was most interested in it.

Regards

Nick Moran
Yamba
NSW.
"HOLDEN MONARO. OUT TO DRIVE YOU WILD!"
Lingus Offline
#26 Posted : Sunday, 18 December 2016 11:03:32 PM(UTC)
Lingus

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/09/2016(UTC)
Posts: 32
Australia
Location: Perth

Thanks: 6 times
It's a fascinating car ... just a little further removed from the 308ci 4-speed HQ Belmont sedans that I recall the W.A. Police using in 1973-74.

Travelling back in time to 1972, I'm curious as to what items would have differentiated a 308ci powered HQ Monaro GTS coupe from a HQ Monaro GTS 350 coupe ... engine and gearbox are obvious variations, but what about other items, such as steering box, brakes, suspension, differential, axles, etc. Would all of the mechanical features of a Monaro GTS 350 coupe have found their way into the build of this Kingswood sedan ?

HK1837 Offline
#27 Posted : Monday, 19 December 2016 5:58:17 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Lingus Go to Quoted Post
It's a fascinating car ... just a little further removed from the 308ci 4-speed HQ Belmont sedans that I recall the W.A. Police using in 1973-74.

Travelling back in time to 1972, I'm curious as to what items would have differentiated a 308ci powered HQ Monaro GTS coupe from a HQ Monaro GTS 350 coupe ... engine and gearbox are obvious variations, but what about other items, such as steering box, brakes, suspension, differential, axles, etc. Would all of the mechanical features of a Monaro GTS 350 coupe have found their way into the build of this Kingswood sedan ?



For GTS coupe L31 M21 vs L30 MC7 from memory the differences are (apart from engine and trans and associated bite like wiring, engine mount adapters, and shifter):

Radiator.
Gearbox Crossmember.
Tailshaft.
Diff yoke (1-tonner uses the 350's yoke).
3.08 rear axle (L31 uses 3.36).
LSD.
Dual exhaust.
Speedo cable.
Throttle linkage.
Sway bar.
Floor hump/blister for shifter.
HD battery.
350 transfers.

I think that is all, may have missed a couple.

For the Kingswood sedan L30 MC7, unless other stiff was optioned it'd get all Kingswood stuff other than engine, box, tailshaft, diff yoke and bits to make them fit like radiator, throttle shaft, floor blister etc. It'd have to get bucket seats and console shift too. So it'd get standard instruments, single exhaust etc. Probably just standard battery too as I think LS didn't get a bigger battery with L30.


_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Lingus Offline
#28 Posted : Monday, 19 December 2016 6:18:01 PM(UTC)
Lingus

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/09/2016(UTC)
Posts: 32
Australia
Location: Perth

Thanks: 6 times
Given what HK1837 has indicated, this Kingswood is pretty much equivalent to a Monaro GTS 350, but with four doors and no black paint accents ... with the sedan sharing the same wheelbase as the coupe, I guess all parts are a natural fit, and I'm guessing also that the four 350 wagons mentioned in the AMCS listing would have simply adopted a Statesman De Ville 350 exhaust system, both vehicles having shared a common longer wheelbase.

Thanks also for mentioning the HQ Monaro LS option with 350 engine ... correct me if I'm wrong, but in a normal dealer sales procedure the LS '350' was not available with a 4-speed manual transmission ... I'm also of the notion that, regardless of transmission choice, the HQ Statesman Custom (I always thought of them as a long wheelbase Kingswood sedan) was not normally available to order with a 350 engine option.

Edited by user Monday, 19 December 2016 6:19:58 PM(UTC)  | Reason: spelling error

Dr Terry Offline
#29 Posted : Monday, 19 December 2016 6:36:20 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Lingus Go to Quoted Post
Thanks also for mentioning the HQ Monaro LS option with 350 engine ... correct me if I'm wrong, but in a normal dealer sales procedure the LS '350' was not available with a 4-speed manual transmission ... I'm also of the notion that, regardless of transmission choice, the HQ Statesman Custom (I always thought of them as a long wheelbase Kingswood sedan) was not normally available to order with a 350 engine option.


For the LS, I believe that to be correct, i.e. no manual option for the 350 V8.

To me the Statesman Custom is really a LWB Premier. They got carpet, 202 6-cyl, timber tone instrument facia, very similar seat trims etc. The Kingwoods got rubber floor, 173, black facia, less ornate seat trims.

AFAIK the Custom did get the 350 option, although I've never seen one.

Dr Terry

Edited by user Monday, 19 December 2016 6:46:25 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
 1 user thanked Dr Terry for this useful post.
Lingus on 19/12/2016(UTC)
HK1837 Offline
#30 Posted : Monday, 19 December 2016 6:42:32 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Lingus Go to Quoted Post
Given what HK1837 has indicated, this Kingswood is pretty much equivalent to a Monaro GTS 350, but with four doors and no black paint accents ... with the sedan sharing the same wheelbase as the coupe, I guess all parts are a natural fit, and I'm guessing also that the four 350 wagons mentioned in the AMCS listing would have simply adopted a Statesman De Ville 350 exhaust system, both vehicles having shared a common longer wheelbase.

Thanks also for mentioning the HQ Monaro LS option with 350 engine ... correct me if I'm wrong, but in a normal dealer sales procedure the LS '350' was not available with a 4-speed manual transmission ... I'm also of the notion that, regardless of transmission choice, the HQ Statesman Custom (I always thought of them as a long wheelbase Kingswood sedan) was not normally available to order with a 350 engine option.


The GTS350 manual sedan would have got over this:

Dual exhaust.
U21 instruments with 140/225km/h speedo.
GTS coupe's suspension and sway bar (but not the fast ratio steering from memory - I missed this in my last post).
GTS trim.
Paint and blackout treatment.

You are correct, this sedan would have simply used GTS350M coupe bits to make everything fit, and also correct the LS was auto only with 350. Statesman was available with 350 IIRC but as a retail order only, would not be a dealer bank vehicle, but then again neither would a 308 example - you'd have to order that too. I think there was at least 1 x L31 M21 Statesman made, and also recently another 1 of 1 car turned up - an L30 M41 HQ V8 Monaro (80437).


_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
detective Offline
#31 Posted : Monday, 19 December 2016 10:22:48 PM(UTC)
detective

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 307

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 11 time(s) in 11 post(s)
Just going through all the notes here, a factory specced HQ GTS 350 Coupe with Turbo Hydramatic 400 came standard with a 3.08 single wheel (non LSD) Salisbury rear axle. The LSD was reserved for the 4 speed Muncie.

Edited by user Monday, 19 December 2016 10:30:16 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

 1 user thanked detective for this useful post.
Lingus on 19/12/2016(UTC)
Lingus Offline
#32 Posted : Monday, 19 December 2016 11:32:51 PM(UTC)
Lingus

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/09/2016(UTC)
Posts: 32
Australia
Location: Perth

Thanks: 6 times
Originally Posted by: Dr Terry Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: Lingus Go to Quoted Post
Thanks also for mentioning the HQ Monaro LS option with 350 engine ... correct me if I'm wrong, but in a normal dealer sales procedure the LS '350' was not available with a 4-speed manual transmission ... I'm also of the notion that, regardless of transmission choice, the HQ Statesman Custom (I always thought of them as a long wheelbase Kingswood sedan) was not normally available to order with a 350 engine option.


For the LS, I believe that to be correct, i.e. no manual option for the 350 V8.

To me the Statesman Custom is really a LWB Premier. They got carpet, 202 6-cyl, timber tone instrument facia, very similar seat trims etc. The Kingwoods got rubber floor, 173, black facia, less ornate seat trims.

AFAIK the Custom did get the 350 option, although I've never seen one.

Dr Terry


Thanks Dr T ... I was relying on my memory, and my 1973 Statesman brochure doesn't include the Custom in any real detail ... but tonight I've found a recent historical eBay listing of a 1971 brochure with all 16 pages scanned ... and indeed the interior of the Custom is revealed as a copy of the Premier in the style of trim and features ... the brochure car is a column-shift automatic with factory air-conditioning and has a front bench seat in vinyl with fold-down central armrest.

The brochure confirms 3-speed manual as the base transmission combination with the 202 engine in Statesman Custom ... 4-speed manual was available with 202, 253, or 308 engines ... and 350 available with Turbo-HydraMatic auto only.

Bidding for the brochure opened at $90.00, but it seems that nobody was interested in the item at that price, despite repeated relisting !

Edited by user Monday, 19 December 2016 11:58:40 PM(UTC)  | Reason: added extra detail from brochure

Lingus Offline
#33 Posted : Monday, 19 December 2016 11:46:16 PM(UTC)
Lingus

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/09/2016(UTC)
Posts: 32
Australia
Location: Perth

Thanks: 6 times
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: Lingus Go to Quoted Post
Given what HK1837 has indicated, this Kingswood is pretty much equivalent to a Monaro GTS 350, but with four doors and no black paint accents ... with the sedan sharing the same wheelbase as the coupe, I guess all parts are a natural fit, and I'm guessing also that the four 350 wagons mentioned in the AMCS listing would have simply adopted a Statesman De Ville 350 exhaust system, both vehicles having shared a common longer wheelbase.

Thanks also for mentioning the HQ Monaro LS option with 350 engine ... correct me if I'm wrong, but in a normal dealer sales procedure the LS '350' was not available with a 4-speed manual transmission ... I'm also of the notion that, regardless of transmission choice, the HQ Statesman Custom (I always thought of them as a long wheelbase Kingswood sedan) was not normally available to order with a 350 engine option.


The GTS350 manual sedan would have got over this:

Dual exhaust.
U21 instruments with 140/225km/h speedo.
GTS coupe's suspension and sway bar (but not the fast ratio steering from memory - I missed this in my last post).
GTS trim.
Paint and blackout treatment.

...



Steering is probably the biggest issue of difference here ... I seem to recall that the bargain buy HQ SS got 'sounded out' for not having a change of steering box ratio ... I wonder what the situation is with regard to the subject Kingswood 350 sedan ??

HK1837 Offline
#34 Posted : Tuesday, 20 December 2016 5:42:45 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
The buyer could have optioned the faster 16.7:1 steering but standard it would have the normal 20:1 regardless of engine, which is what GTS sedan had too unless optioned. The buyer could have optioned a lot of GTS standard stuff on this Kingswood but could never have got (assembly plant fitted anyway):

Guards.
Paint blackout treatment.
Dash (could have optioned U21 dash but couldn't get the GTS's dash complete with 140mph speedo).
Badges.
Trim.
Not certain on the suspension. Some of the GTS's suspension could be had as HD items on V8 Kingswood or Monaro, but possibly not all of it.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Warren Turnbull Offline
#35 Posted : Tuesday, 20 December 2016 8:17:23 AM(UTC)
Warren Turnbull

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 10/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,357

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 28 time(s) in 27 post(s)
The problem is there is still a lot of conjecture here. I have no doubt that the car was ordered and the checks and balances that are in place to ensure cars like this are not ordered by the general public fail. Now that may have been simply by the fact that the dealer thought the local police were ordering it, and when questioned by zone office as to why they were ordering things that were not available simply told them the same and they let it through.

It is what happens then with the zone office that really counts. Did they then specify GTS 350 suspension for the car because they also thought it to be used for special duties? Or did they not care? Same with the steering?

The car is considered as a relevant quasi Monaro by the experts, this being shown by its entry in the Monaro Nationals. When Ben wrote the rules on the Monaro Nationals, for the Warwick event, the only non Monaros allowed to enter had to be entered by members of the Monaro Club of QLD and were in Affiliate class. This car is not owned by a Monaro club member and was entered in "special Interest". So was considered to be a Monaro at the Monaro Nationals.

Warren
Silverfox Offline
#36 Posted : Tuesday, 20 December 2016 8:35:33 PM(UTC)
Silverfox

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/11/2008(UTC)
Posts: 435

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Hello Warren and all.

I agree with Warren about conjecture regarding the car.

There is NO conjecture from me. I am passing forward information provided on privilege to me from the first owner. I find it annoying that an honest owner and his car can be negatively affected by "connjecture".

Owner one was an old school cop. The way things rolled in the early seventies is completely different to today. Firstly, some are saying the integrity of the production line could be compromised by allowing cars like this to actually get built. Well they did get built. At GM-H, Ford and Chrysler. Another manufacturer of note in this is BMC with the Morris Cooper 'S'. The Police cars were fitted with 1310cc engines. Punters got non-oversize 1275cc engines. Senior execs in all car companies "got things done" using their influence.... often. Owner one told me he had colleagues elsewhere in the force and in the NSW Government Motor Garage and from time to time a "special" order could be placed for a fellow workmate. The car was delivered through Robinsons. Even though Robinsons may or may not have been able to deliver such a car through normal means the first had a network available to him which could see to it.
Cheers.
Nick.
"HOLDEN MONARO. OUT TO DRIVE YOU WILD!"
Warren Turnbull Offline
#37 Posted : Tuesday, 20 December 2016 10:36:37 PM(UTC)
Warren Turnbull

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 10/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,357

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 28 time(s) in 27 post(s)
I have to disagree with you Nick about these cars being built. Yes it is true that "special" cars are built for a variety of reasons, and some of those turn up from time to time:

Internal GMH
Show cars
Manager cars
Prototype cars

Then there are the special fleet:
Unique colours
Statesman built for Malcolm Fraser

Dealer specials

Patterson anniversary
LJ "Daytona Torana"
Suttons HG GTS panel vans

But these lead people to believe that anyone could walk in off the street and order anything they wanted. That is simply not true, and this car fits into the category of "should not have been made". Which is why it is so special, because it did get made.

There is a reason that Holden only allows some options on some cars and not on others, even though it is mechanically possible. I hear stories all the time about HQ to HZ Belmonts and Kingswoods with factory Premier fronts. Holden would not allow the prestige model front to be fitted to a lower spec vehicle as an option, yet saying that they fitted them to HZ Sandman. The same goes here with the 350 engine, it was a GTS and Statesman thing. Now Ben and I were recently discussing the HQ LS and came to he conclusion that it is more like a 2 door Statesman than a Premier, hence the 350 option. So this exclusive option to the top line car could not be ordered by anyone. This shows by the small number that exist, two being in GMH Show cars and the most being ordered through Bob Jane or personal use.

It is great that little slip ups do happen, but there are probably a dozen HQs that would have slipped through the system.

Warren


detective Offline
#38 Posted : Tuesday, 20 December 2016 10:45:43 PM(UTC)
detective

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 307

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 11 time(s) in 11 post(s)
...I simply have to refute the notion that "things got done" (words to that effect) at the factory. It was just too hard to manufacture a "one off" specialty vehicle to pander to a "boys club" style of ordering system.

...Not a lot of people realise that all vehicles produced at the GM and GMH plants had to be paid for at factory level before they were delivered to the dealer outlet....either by outright cash sale or the widely popular credit financed "floor plan" option, and were built to a subscribed factory "Bill of Materials" list. The easiest way to appease a demanding customer was to have the dealer "build" the car and have that dealer fit it out and furnish it....with all the attendant worries of warranty and servicing beholden of them.

Edited by user Tuesday, 20 December 2016 11:00:22 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Lingus Offline
#39 Posted : Tuesday, 20 December 2016 11:03:47 PM(UTC)
Lingus

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/09/2016(UTC)
Posts: 32
Australia
Location: Perth

Thanks: 6 times
Originally Posted by: Warren Turnbull Go to Quoted Post
I have to disagree with you Nick about these cars being built. Yes it is true that "special" cars are built for a variety of reasons, and some of those turn up from time to time:

...


...

There is a reason that Holden only allows some options on some cars and not on others, even though it is mechanically possible. I hear stories all the time about HQ to HZ Belmonts and Kingswoods with factory Premier fronts. Holden would not allow the prestige model front to be fitted to a lower spec vehicle as an option, yet saying that they fitted them to HZ Sandman. The same goes here with the 350 engine, it was a GTS and Statesman thing. Now Ben and I were recently discussing the HQ LS and came to he conclusion that it is more like a 2 door Statesman than a Premier, hence the 350 option. So this exclusive option to the top line car could not be ordered by anyone. This shows by the small number that exist, two being in GMH Show cars and the most being ordered through Bob Jane or personal use.

It is great that little slip ups do happen, but there are probably a dozen HQs that would have slipped through the system.

Warren





By the time the HZ-series arrived, Holden was considering the driver more than it ever did before, offering up better brakes, better suspension and better lighting ... halogen lamps were virtually standard across the board and the quad-light arrangement found its way across Premier, Statesman, GTS and Sandman ... Statesman variants had a few individual grille designs, but the other three shared the same grille design but with different colourways.

In addition, there was a so-called 'ambulance' option available for V8 commercial vehicles, including the one-tonner, whereby the vehicles were fitted with a Premier front clip and (oddly enough) Premier interior door cards.

As for the Monaro LS effectively being a Statesman coupe, I've never seen a LS with brocade trim ! :-) ... the only similarity that satisfies me is the shared option availability of the 350 V8 with Turbo-HydraMatic transmission.

Edited by user Tuesday, 20 December 2016 11:25:25 PM(UTC)  | Reason: additional comment

HK1837 Offline
#40 Posted : Wednesday, 21 December 2016 9:29:24 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
Warren is pretty much right, the bulk of the "left-of-centre" cars are internal vehicles or specials etc. Not only is it extremely rare to find something not officially available (like a 350 in a Kingswood or Premier) but it is also very rare to find actual optional drivelines that were not stock order (that is vehicles entered into the schedule for sale rather than vehicles built to order). For example 5litre 4speed outside of GTS and Sandman (and later SLR and SS), the bulk of these (probably 98%+) will be retail order rather than stock order (or in some cases dealer ordered). The primary reason being most vehicles sold were sold out of stock rather than ordered, thus those 308 manual cars that you find that aren't a GTS or a Sandman will be either a retail order or in some cases a dealer has ordered the car for either himself or they knew they could make a decent margin on the car if they had it for sale now rather than a customer having to wait.

On the quad headlight noses, Leo Pruneau wanted these for GTS from the start, but never got his way until HZ. So as Warren says it was reserved solely for Premier, LS, and Chevrolet 350 (became Caprice later in HQ) with the Statesman and Deville getting its unique nose. Of course as we know the quad nose panel became the same for Premier, LS, Deville and the new local Caprice at HJ release. The reason Sandman got it was HZ GTS had it and Sandman always had the GTS's nose sans badges except in HQ where it used the SS's nose. As Lingus says the Ambulance package available from around mid HJ on panel van and cab-chassis used the Premier's quad light front, but apart from it and unless it was some sort of internal vehicle there is very little chance an assembly plant would have fitted the quad nose to any vehicle. Even some of the GMH TEST VEHICLE's (stamped on cowl or inner guards) I've come across, eg an orange HX (IIRC) Sandman van that had one may have had it added in styling rather than in the assembly plant. Same with the GTS's guards, outside of HQ/HJ Sandman, HQ SS and HX LE you won't find normal assembly plant fitted fluted guards unless the car was some sort of internal vehicle. Today these whole bullshit stories about "GTS options" and "specially ordered with GTS bits" that people come up with is a big wank. I can only imagine what they'd write about my HJ Premier with its U17 dash, rally rims, 308 and console shift - it'd be some BS story about "GTS options" or some junk like that - most stuff isn't even GTS options, it was GTS Standard!

I'm not a huge fan of seeing the LS as a Statesman coupe though. When you look at it in real terms the HQ Monaro and HQ V8 Monaro look like and are plated as a Kingswood coupe (80337 or 80437). The HQ Monaro GTS coupe and the HQ Monaro GTS350 coupe are standalone models. The HQ Monaro LS and HQ V8 Monaro LS look like and are plated as a Premier coupe (81137 and 81237). Sure the LS gets some special treatment over Premier earlier in HQ like standard front discs. And certainly, the HQ V8 Monaro LS had as a regular option the L30 auto engine, but that doesn't make it a Statesman coupe, it just means it got some special treatment as it was a Monaro just like the front discs being standard on the Monaro LS where the sedan version got drums standard. If it was a Statesman coupe it'd have the Statesman's unique nose plus the Monaro is a Holden, the Statesman was not meant to be seen as a Holden. The top of the line Holden was the Premier or the LS. In HJ the LS gets even more Premier like as there was no longer a HJ Statesman, but the Premier to Deville to LS link in HJ does remain strong. I do appreciate the subtle Statesman link though, but to me the LS is far more Premier than it is Statesman.

Edited by user Wednesday, 21 December 2016 9:35:19 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
6 Pages<1234>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.144 seconds.