Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

2 Pages<12
castellan Offline
#21 Posted : Monday, 19 February 2018 6:45:17 AM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
HT GTS350 was delayed due to manual engines. GMH had to get them rebuilt locally but rings put in were wrong and most died pretty quickly. This is why it is so rare to find an unopened manual HT-HG GTS350 US engine. Plenty of auto and Canadian engines and 327’s.


How could the rings put in be wrong ? Holden did not know what they were doing ?
HK1837 Offline
#22 Posted : Monday, 19 February 2018 7:18:03 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
GMH didn’t do it, they didn’t have the capacity to rebuild 100’s of engines pronto. Read what I said again, I said nothing about installing rings wrong.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
castellan Offline
#23 Posted : Tuesday, 20 February 2018 9:01:36 AM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
GMH didn’t do it, they didn’t have the capacity to rebuild 100’s of engines pronto. Read what I said again, I said nothing about installing rings wrong.


I said how could the rings put in be wrong, are they different to the auto 350, I don't see why they should be any different at all.

GMH had to get them rebuilt locally but the rings put in were wrong ? in what way are rings wrong.

Most died pretty quickly ? why, it sounds like rubbish to me and I never said they were installed wrong, you can put them in upside down but I never said that at all.

So molly rings were put in ? like in what you would put in a Falcon GT-HO.
HK1837 Offline
#24 Posted : Tuesday, 20 February 2018 12:24:30 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
It is fact, Whether you choose to believe it or not bothers me not. I wouldn’t type it if it wasn’t fact.. Go and research what bore finish is required for standard versus premium rings, and what happens if you use premium rings in a bore finished for standard cast rings.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Warren Turnbull Offline
#25 Posted : Tuesday, 20 February 2018 5:47:16 PM(UTC)
Warren Turnbull

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 10/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,357

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 28 time(s) in 27 post(s)
No the guy was in Brisbane. Not sure how he came across the car but I think it was without driveline.

Warren
castellan Offline
#26 Posted : Wednesday, 21 February 2018 7:58:36 AM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
It is fact, Whether you choose to believe it or not bothers me not. I wouldn’t type it if it wasn’t fact.. Go and research what bore finish is required for standard versus premium rings, and what happens if you use premium rings in a bore finished for standard cast rings.

I never said I did not believe it.
Oh that's all it is, the finish of the bore to the ring type, by premium rings you mean molly top ring, that has to be bedded in correctly as well, driven hard as you can straight off the bat too make them bed in best.
Dr Terry Offline
#27 Posted : Wednesday, 21 February 2018 8:52:00 AM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
No, I don't believe they were moly rings, after all this was the late 60s. I seem to remember a lot of drama with chrome rings vs cast iron rings.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
HK1837 Offline
#28 Posted : Wednesday, 21 February 2018 9:33:04 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
Standard rings in a 253 or 308 starting in HT were Moly according to Engineering technical and also the Service Manuals. Same documents list Chrome rings as standard rings in 307, 327 and 350. Chrome is chrome plated face cast top ring, chrome steel oil rings and tapered cast iron on middle ring.

Standard replacement rings as listed in all HK, HT, HG and early HQ up to ADR26 engines (text from parts catalogues):

"Production" replacement rings for low mile and warranty work, part numbers listed are all moly ring sets.
"Service" replacement rings for high mile engines, part numbers listed are "Chromeflex" ring sets. I think the difference is the middle ring (will check)

The rings listed in the HK-HQ parts catalogue as "production" are listed in US parts catalogues as "premium" moly rings for high performance engines like the fuel injected 327. The boxes the rings come in state they are moly too.

Edited by user Wednesday, 21 February 2018 11:03:40 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Clarification

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.035 seconds.