The console?
Just wondering why Pagewood would be different to other assembly plants? The vehicle build specs were dictated by the same mainframe that generated the parts requirement for all vehicles, and all parts were sourced from the same source for all all assembly plants.
Or are you thinking the consoles were painted at the assembly plants hence a possible local variation? I have always wondered if the known variation in these is actually early (initial) build versus later build. GTS and GTS327 volume production started about a week later than Monaro, meaning about 300 Monaros from both Pagewood and Dandenong and a lesser number from the other plants prior to regular production GTS/GTS327. I believe the delay in GTS/GTS327 was the console meaning all those early Monaro with V8 (and Brougham) would be column shift. My thought process was the build of GTS and GTS327 was delayed to a point until consoles were available, and maybe the first lot of them to be sent to the assembly plants were black only OR some of the assembly plants didn't have the time to wait to paint them so put them in black as they had hard trimmed and painted body shells ready to be assembled. The best evidence to support this I have is as follows:
1. The only thing mentioned on the pilot run HK GTS/GTS327's in GHM records as incomplete was a "mockup" console. Everything else on these that differed or was unique to a GTS, V8 GTS or a GTS327 appears to be correct.
2. My two Warwick Yellow cars. The chassis number on the GTS327 (2-H5) is about 30 less than the V8 GTS (20-H5), meaning the 327 left the Pagewood body plant before the GTS, but within hours. It was delayed for maybe half a day in assembly as the GTS went through the assembly plant first and thus got a PSN lower by about 150 than the GTS327. My guess is the GTS was completed as normal ie left the body plant and progressed to the assembly plant. But the GTS327 was done as a backshift car (probably that night or the next morning if it was Friday), ie was put aside and bought into the assembly plant later - it even sports the Pagewood backshift hand stamped data on the VIN plate prior to the PSN. My conclusion is this car had to wait for something before assembly commenced. My guess is that is the console IF there was a part delay. The other possibility is the stories about special shifts for assembly of certain Monaros, and this could also be a possibility (bodies got assembled as they found them). My guess on this is it would be fiddly ones like a GTS327 for special shifts, whereas my Yellow V8 GTS is a bog standard pre-August 1968 build ie V8, Powerglide, LSD banjo and 5" rims so was no more difficult to assemble than any other V8 HK to that point, other than of course the console shift (remember glass went in to the car in the body plant and that would be the hardest bit different to a sedan/wagon/ute).
Both of my Warwick Yellow GTS/GTS327 are Pagewood but both are 10X trim so they are no help. My mate’s blue GTS327 and Inca Gold GTS were also Pagewood assembly but they were 18Y and 10X - unfortunately when he got the GTS327 with 18Y trim in the 80's it had been fitted with a Toploader and the console was missing. My Silver Mink with Red trim GTS was a very late Pagewood build, like right near the end of HK and it had a red console if I remember correctly. I also know of another Pagewood V8 4spd GTS in blue with 18X trim. I first saw the car in the early 90's as a Survivor, and I still have the owner's number. So I will give him a ring and see if he still has it and what console colour it has. I have it's numbers here somewhere too, will let you know when it was assembled approximately.
The other thing to check is Pagewood console shift Brougham or Premier from that period, many of these won't have black trim so may give you a console colour hint. Looks for cars around chassis number HK23000-24000SS.
Edited by user Wednesday, 12 June 2019 8:34:58 AM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified