Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 21/06/2011(UTC) Posts: 47
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
Hi,
With a VR ute plate s below.
Model - VR8VK80-725
Trim - 14I Paint F112 Built Jul94 Eng LB9 Trans M78 Axel GU4 Susp STD A/C C60
Does the model number with 725 mean it was an "S" model?
Mauser
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC) Posts: 14,728
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 513 time(s) in 489 post(s)
|
Could you get a V8 outside of S in VR?
I only just bought a set of VR parts catalogues last week, haven’t even opened the package yet. Will fire up the ‘fiche reader and look if no-one else has the info at hand. |
_______________________________________________________ If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords? |
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 30/04/2005(UTC) Posts: 470 Was thanked: 15 time(s) in 14 post(s)
|
Brochures for VR ute , 3 say see your Holder dealer re - V8 , and 1 says option on S ute only. 725 is 7 -S . 2- V8 & 5 - 5 speed. |
life is good in "Wine & Holden Marlborough " |
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC) Posts: 14,728
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 513 time(s) in 489 post(s)
|
I remember when I bought my VSIII ute that V8 was only on S ute, you couldn't get it on a Holden ute. I thought it was the same in VG as well. I do remember thinking how stupid, Ford allowed V8 on the base Falcon ute or cab-chassis. By the time I got mine though VSIII SS ute and the Olympic Edition had been around with V8 but earlier than those it was just Holden or S utes. |
_______________________________________________________ If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords? |
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 21/06/2011(UTC) Posts: 47
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
Thanks for the replies.
What badges did these models come with? I thought a Holden one on the tailgate but Im unsure of the rest.
Mauser
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC) Posts: 14,728
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 513 time(s) in 489 post(s)
|
The base one only had Holden badges from memory. I know some had Commodore badges for some weird reason, but I think it may have been as simple as not wanting specialised parts for the side strips and maybe the dash where the Commodore name was. |
_______________________________________________________ If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords? |
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC) Posts: 6,064
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
|
All VR Utes were called Commodores but only the S model got a Commodore badge, one on the trailing edge of each front guard. Holden on the tailgate. AFAIK all VP to VS Utes were called Commodores, all others were just Holdens. The later ones were a bit odd too. Base VE utes were badged Omega just like the sedans, while in VF they were just Holdens again, not Evokes as the sedans were. Dr Terry Edited by user Monday, 24 April 2023 6:35:37 PM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0 |
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC) Posts: 14,728
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 513 time(s) in 489 post(s)
|
I've never been convinced either way Terry. It seems like Holden at the time were confused themselves exactly what the Utes were. For example, the VP Parts Catalogues are quite clear - they all say "VP" Calais & Commodore. Holden Utility. Yet the service manuals (VPII at least) are only Calais, Commodore, Statesman and Caprice with utes in them - the upshoot being the Utes must be included as a Commodore as they aren't a Calais, Statesman or Caprice. Then you get to VSIII sales brochure, no mention anywhere of Commodore. Always called Utility or Holden Utility, yet there is the COMMODORE badge but only on the S. The colour chart that I got when I bought my VSIII says Commodore, Calais and Holden Utility. Yet the VS Parts Catalogues just say "VS" Caprice/Statesman. Calais/Commodore. Just found another book here. VP glovebox manual, says COMMODORE, CALAIS, UTILITY. Same as VN/VG does. From what I can see VR says "COMMODORE, CALAIS, STATESMAN, CAPRICE". And VS just says "COMMODORE, CALAIS" although I cannot remember what was on the Owners Manual for my VSIII. Edited by user Tuesday, 25 April 2023 9:59:43 AM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
_______________________________________________________ If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords? |
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC) Posts: 6,064
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: HK1837 I've never been convinced either way Terry. It seems like Holden at the time were confused themselves exactly what the Utes were.
For example, the VP Parts Catalogues are quite clear - they all say "VP" Calais & Commodore. Holden Utility. Yet the service manuals (VPII at least) are only Calais, Commodore, Statesman and Caprice with utes in them - the upshoot being the Utes must be included as a Commodore as they aren't a Calais, Statesman or Caprice. Then you get to VSIII sales brochure, no mention anywhere of Commodore. Always called Utility or Holden Utility, yet there is the COMMODORE badge but only on the S. The colour chart that I got when I bought my VSIII says Commodore, Calais and Holden Utility. Yet the VS Parts Catalogues just say "VS" Caprice/Statesman. Calais/Commodore. Just found another book here. VP glovebox manual, says COMMODORE, CALAIS, UTILITY. Same as VN/VG does. From what I can see VR says "COMMODORE, CALAIS, STATESMAN, CAPRICE". And VS just says "COMMODORE, CALAIS" although I cannot remember what was on the Owners Manual for my VSIII. Yes, GMH weren't real sure were they ? I went thru all this for my 50 years book & I find that while the various catalogues & brochures didn't quite agree, all VP - VS utes had a Commodore badge somewhere, even the base utes had it on the dashboard above the glovebox. The others (VG, VU, VY etc.) had a Holden badge in that spot. On a similar topic have you noticed how there are very few Commodore badges on VE/VF. Most might have a SV6, SS, Omega or Evoke badge, but not many have a Commodore badge. Dr Terry |
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0 |
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 21/06/2011(UTC) Posts: 47
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
Thanks for all the responses. Picked up the ute quite cheaply and the 304/T5 mechanicals seem healthy at 190k. Was just going to try return a few things to std and tidy the interior a little. It has the usual clearcoat issues but is fairly straight and rust free. Was just going keep one and put it away as they are getting rarer and I just like the older V8 sound over the Chev ones. Mauser Edited by user Wednesday, 26 April 2023 9:51:45 AM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC) Posts: 14,728
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 513 time(s) in 489 post(s)
|
The last Holden ute with a Chev engine was built in 1972! I don’t know the exact timing of when the Chevy small block ended but it was the 90’s. I always intended to try and find a good VSIII SS and keep it. I even have brand new seat covers and a steering wheel for one. A really nice one turned up locally but it was a manual and Phantom both of which turned me off. An auto in Bermuda would be my choice. Edited by user Wednesday, 26 April 2023 11:12:22 AM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
_______________________________________________________ If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords? |
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC) Posts: 6,064
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: HK1837 The last Holden ute with a Chev engine was built in 1972! I don’t know the exact timing of when the Chevy small block ended but it was the 90’s.
I think he means the LS1/2/3 type GM engine. I have heard some refer to these as "Chevs", when they are really GM-Powertrain engines. Dr Terry |
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0 |
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC) Posts: 14,728
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 513 time(s) in 489 post(s)
|
I’ve never been able to find the definitive answer of when the Chevrolet small block ended and the GM small block started. I think it was 1992 when the one piece rear main seal GenII engine appeared but it may have been initially in a Chevrolet factory. The official formation of GM Powertrain was around 1992 but it seems that the process began earlier, just not sure how much earlier. Edited by user Wednesday, 26 April 2023 12:57:55 PM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
_______________________________________________________ If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords? |
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC) Posts: 6,064
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: HK1837 I’ve never been able to find the definitive answer of when the Chevrolet small block ended and the GM small block started. I think it was 1992 when the one piece rear main seal GenII engine appeared but it may have been initially in a Chevrolet factory. The official formation of GM Powertrain was around 1997 but it seems that the process began earlier, just not sure how much earlier. Good point. I always thought that GM-Powertrain began around 1991/92, when the TH700 became the 4L60. I assumed that's when the Chev name was dropped from the engines. I've never looked close enough at a late small block to see if there are any marking or bowties etc. There is certainly no mention of Chev or a bowtie anywhere on an LS style motor. Dr Terry Edited by user Wednesday, 26 April 2023 12:49:56 PM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0 |
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC) Posts: 6,064
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: HK1837 I think it was 1992 when the one piece rear main seal GenII engine appeared but it may have been initially in a Chevrolet factory. From memory the GenII V8 was released around 1992, but the one piece rear mail seal was also fitted to the last 6 or 7 years of GenI engines. Also I believe that the GM-Powertrain factory was an ex-Pontaic facility. Dr Terry |
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0 |
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC) Posts: 14,728
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 513 time(s) in 489 post(s)
|
I had a typo in my last post, typed 1997 but meant 1992. It looks like they began consolidating the Powertrain divisions in 1984 and that continued until 1991. GM Powertrain was formed in 1992 and lasted until 2016 when the name was changed to General Motors Global Propulsion Systems. So this would mean any one piece rear main seal small block is a GM Powertrain engine like any GenIII onwards. I’m pretty sure GM Powertrain continued to offer the two piece as a crate engine though. Edited by user Wednesday, 26 April 2023 1:49:14 PM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
_______________________________________________________ If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords? |
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 21/06/2011(UTC) Posts: 47
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: HK1837 The last Holden ute with a Chev engine was built in 1972! I don’t know the exact timing of when the Chevy small block ended but it was the 90’s.
I always intended to try and find a good VSIII SS and keep it. I even have brand new seat covers and a steering wheel for one. A really nice one turned up locally but it was a manual and Phantom both of which turned me off. An auto in Bermuda would be my choice. This one came with the VS SS mags. :-) Mauser
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC) Posts: 14,728
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 513 time(s) in 489 post(s)
|
Proper 16” or the 17” ones of passenger VS?
I’ve got some VR SS wheels that were new on an early VS ute, they were an optional on them. I had them for a trailer but my mate wants them for a VR SS HBD he has for his daughter to learn to drive in, it has some ugly aftermarket bogan wheels on it. |
_______________________________________________________ If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords? |
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 21/06/2011(UTC) Posts: 47
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
Ahhh I didn't realise there was a difference. Yes, they are the 17" version.
A wrecker has one on ebay. Are these the same type as you have?
Holden vs ss commodore trailer alloy mag wheel rim each 225x50x16 EBay item number:125254665489
Mauser
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC) Posts: 14,728
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 513 time(s) in 489 post(s)
|
VS SS utes were 16". That one in the link is one off an SS ute. The ones I have are VR SS sedan 15x7, they were optional wheels on VS S ute. |
_______________________________________________________ If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords? |
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.