Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

detective Offline
#1 Posted : Monday, 17 March 2014 8:36:20 AM(UTC)
detective

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 307

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 11 time(s) in 11 post(s)
Hi all .. i'm a lover of great old cars, and very much appreciate something that has barely been touched...

...the "all numbers matching" stuff has left me a little jaded, because as we all know numbers can be manufactured ...and made to match..

...i have marvelled in the past about a LOT of cars with this desired attribute, but really?.......

...any comments from the co-jaded?......
commodorenut Offline
#2 Posted : Monday, 17 March 2014 5:31:34 PM(UTC)
commodorenut

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 2/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 3,135

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 35 time(s) in 33 post(s)
That tagline is usually a telltale sign that the seller has their hand on it.

I can understand on particular Ford models, where the engine number & body VIN number match each other, where a "matching numbers" claim can come from, but in the Holden world, 2/3 important numbers that need to be "original" bear no correlation to each other (body/tag/PSN, Engine, Chassis from '72 on).
The only place they are all recorded (GMH PSN tag lists for certain models) is generally inaccessible to most (or gone forever), or the other place is open to tampering (owner's manual).

And how many Holden engines have been decked during a rebuild & had the original number re-stamped with the wrong stamps? Who knows what was once under there?

This is a topic that I view with disbelief most of the time. It seems every 25+ year old car that turns up these days is a "barn find" or "all original" and none of them have ever had anything about their identity compromised. Yet you take an educated look, and all of a sudden there's a can of worms. People either have short memories, or weren't around in the 70s & 80s when Holdens (particularly V8s) were hot poroperty for theft, and thousands of them lost their original numbers. Engine reconditioners didn't care what they gave you back as an exchange, and neither did owners. Engines were reco'd all the time. Yet in today's cer-selling market, none of this seems to be considered. It seems every car had a perfect life.
Cheers,

Mick
_______________________________________________________________

Judge a successful man not on how he treats his peers, but on how he treats those less fortunate.
Robbo Offline
#3 Posted : Tuesday, 18 March 2014 1:32:19 AM(UTC)
Robbo

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 21/09/2007(UTC)
Posts: 276

Thanks: 1 times
Spot on Mick, I remember the 70's very well, and the number of Gt Falcon's, Monaro's,Torana's,Cooper S,and Chrysler's that were stolen or destroyed is incredible. Insurances went through the roof then. "Matching mumber's" and "Barn find" is just the current catchphrase. To me it is just the current version of the old "Only Driven On Sunday". Barn find is just another Americanism anyway, we have shed's.
There Is No Replacement For Displacement.
HGV8 Offline
#4 Posted : Tuesday, 18 March 2014 9:10:25 AM(UTC)
HGV8

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 420

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 9 post(s)
I understand what you guys are saying but let me give a sample of where I believe the statement "matching numbers" for a holden for sale, would be a fair statement to make. One of my cars is low mile 253 HG Premier. All numbers, including engine number, keys etc matches its original books and purchase reciept. The motor shows no sign of ever being taken out of the car, or even having the heads off. I would have no hesitation if I was ever to sell it to advertise it as "matching numbers".
So over the years I have learnt to never dismiss a car advertised as matching number as you might miss out on a real gem. A chat with the owner then a close inspection will soon sort out the truth of the claim.

Edited by user Tuesday, 18 March 2014 9:21:32 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

j.williams
castellan Offline
#5 Posted : Tuesday, 18 March 2014 9:09:19 PM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Matching numbers nothing wrong with that.

But is it original, it may have the original block but is the cam etc original.

If you were to want a XY GT-HO and the point is you wanted an athentic one just to know it's just like you got back when it was new.

Sure you can make a better XY anyday than a old GT-HO so on that point it's up to who wants what and why.
detective Offline
#6 Posted : Wednesday, 19 March 2014 2:46:33 AM(UTC)
detective

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 307

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 11 time(s) in 11 post(s)
...yes castellan you've certainly touched on a finer point.. a little off topic but apparently the GTHO phase 3 cam was a bit of a bugger when the engine was cold and left a bit to be desired regarding braking....hence the vacuum tank...
wbute Offline
#7 Posted : Wednesday, 19 March 2014 7:05:02 AM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
It depends on how open your eyes are. If you have little knowledge you could be convinced fairly easily that a Holden was matching numbers. Perhaps original condition would be a more accurate description? That should mean unrestored and as it left the factory. New paint straight away should mean unoriginal but as designed or optioned. This should have more and more relevance as cars get older and proving how Holden actually presented cars on the showroom becomes less and less easily proven.
So original would automatically mean it had proof that it still had its original componetry. Good luck proving it though. Thieves made a living forging these cars.
Warren Turnbull Offline
#8 Posted : Wednesday, 19 March 2014 9:43:57 PM(UTC)
Warren Turnbull

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 10/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,357

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 28 time(s) in 27 post(s)
"matching numbers" is normally associated with the engine and chassis alligning. But there are also other numbers, some cars have date coded panels and parts, radio serial numbers, gearbox serial numbers just to name a few.

Interestingly you could have a car that grenaded an engine, so fitted with a replacement block, every other part as it left the factory and it would be considered less original than a fully rebuilt car with its original enigne.

Warren
albyht Offline
#9 Posted : Friday, 28 March 2014 2:37:13 AM(UTC)
albyht

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/08/2013(UTC)
Posts: 64

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Early holdens are now 40+yrs old now. I agree, totally original condition cars (matching numbers - a term ive only heard about in recent times) are hard to find now.
Those that are in good unrestored condition can often bring more money these days than a restored car. That is just the market these days. Even a so called barn find usually has had mods up until it was parked in some shed somewhere, even if that was 20+ yrs ago. It's true that Back in the 70s, 80's no one thought to preserve original parts, motors. That's why they are more desirable today and whether we like it or not. It is what the market seems to want these days.
Al
detective Offline
#10 Posted : Friday, 28 March 2014 6:16:13 AM(UTC)
detective

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 307

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 11 time(s) in 11 post(s)
...i fitted a "Trans Go" shift kit to the TH400 in the GTS350 way back in the early 'Eighties and unfortunately, promptly proceeded to wreck this original correctly calibrated gearbox that these GTS 350's had....

...the only TH400 available was ex HQ Statesman (from memory) and she went from what was originally a very slick shifting car to an absolute slush box!! (aaah the exuberance and stupidity of youth!)...

...the real "criminal" part on my behalf was not retaining the buggered 'box (and its data tag) with the car and sold the sorry mess for about $100.00 ....i thought i'd done pretty well to get that kind of money....

....hindsight is such a wonderful thing when the "matching numbers" scenario comes into play....but that notion didn't amount to a hill o' beans back in the day.....cheers fellas
castellan Offline
#11 Posted : Monday, 31 March 2014 6:08:33 AM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by detective
...i fitted a "Trans Go" shift kit to the TH400 in the GTS350 way back in the early 'Eighties and unfortunately, promptly proceeded to wreck this original correctly calibrated gearbox that these GTS 350's had....

...the only TH400 available was ex HQ Statesman (from memory) and she went from what was originally a very slick shifting car to an absolute slush box!! (aaah the exuberance and stupidity of youth!)...

...the real "criminal" part on my behalf was not retaining the buggered 'box (and its data tag) with the car and sold the sorry mess for about $100.00 ....i thought i'd done pretty well to get that kind of money....

....hindsight is such a wonderful thing when the "matching numbers" scenario comes into play....but that notion didn't amount to a hill o' beans back in the day.....cheers fellas
T400 best auto in the world some say, i say it was a power robber slush box with the gutless HQ GTS 350 and even more gutless HQ 350 Statesman behind the 308 HJ-X-Z VB the most backward auto you could drive, 30km/h before the mongrel would go back into 1st gear, boring beond belief.
The auto you have when you have no understanding of how to drive. if you know what you are doing you can modify them to perform well. but holden had the stupid T Bar set up that only a idiot with no idear how it should work would of designed that.
The Ford T Bar was magic that only a fool could make a mistake using it and the C4 auto was just magic as it was prfection to use.
git Offline
#12 Posted : Wednesday, 7 May 2014 1:19:49 AM(UTC)
git

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/10/2010(UTC)
Posts: 157

quote:
Originally posted by HGV8
I understand what you guys are saying but let me give a sample of where I believe the statement "matching numbers" for a holden for sale, would be a fair statement to make. One of my cars is low mile 253 HG Premier. All numbers, including engine number, keys etc matches its original books and purchase reciept. The motor shows no sign of ever being taken out of the car, or even having the heads off. I would have no hesitation if I was ever to sell it to advertise it as "matching numbers".
So over the years I have learnt to never dismiss a car advertised as matching number as you might miss out on a real gem. A chat with the owner then a close inspection will soon sort out the truth of the claim.


Greetings, The best response to the original question by a country mile. This term - matching numbers - is applicable to any and all car makers. If the numbers present on the car today match those that the manufacturer has on file then it is a matching numbers car. Nothing more nothing less. An engine number doesn't necessarily have to match a chassis number or any other number on the car. But they must match the records held by the maker. For a Holden, the car numbers must match the GMH records. Numbers can be made to match as one poster suggested so that a car appears to be matching numbers when checked against the maker's records.
look out, the guru is coming through...
Warren Turnbull Offline
#13 Posted : Wednesday, 7 May 2014 3:51:58 AM(UTC)
Warren Turnbull

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 10/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,357

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 28 time(s) in 27 post(s)
If this is true, then no "Holden" can be matching numbers as GMH do not have chassis number records on file. Even HHS do not have the chassis numbers.

At the moment people are relying on the orginal books and if the numbers match these they are calling them matching numbers, however people are now reproducing these books and producing "matching numbers" cars.

Warren
HK1837 Offline
#14 Posted : Thursday, 8 May 2014 3:51:16 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
True Warren, but at different times at the body and assembly plants the chassis numbers align perfectly with other numbers on the cars (but not all the time and not at all assembly plants). You just have to know the sequences and when/where and a non-matching car's chassis number stands out like the proverbial.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Users browsing this topic
Guest (4)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.123 seconds.