Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/06/2007(UTC) Posts: 582
|
Ja, people had side-exit pipes and lakes pipes confused.
As i knew, pipes used to have to exit a distance rearwards of the last opening window, as Dr Terry stated.
To run lakes pipes i daresay your standard ground clearance rules combine with the pipe exit rules. Youd think you could work a way around it, but knowing things are as they are, well, good luck!
"Silly modern cars" |
"Silly modern cars" |
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 12/10/2005(UTC) Posts: 495
|
quote: Originally posted by HQforme
Ja, people had side-exit pipes and lakes pipes confused.
As i knew, pipes used to have to exit a distance rearwards of the last opening window, as Dr Terry stated.
To run lakes pipes i daresay your standard ground clearance rules combine with the pipe exit rules. Youd think you could work a way around it, but knowing things are as they are, well, good luck! "Silly modern cars"
This is where things become silly, because as with the photo of the White Z/28 Camaro above, the pipes would not be any lower than the factory front Air dam, or Spoiler. The only things I see as an RTA violation - are noise decibels, danger caused by heat, and emissions. Have not heard of Lake pipes as been fake, with exhaust gases exiting elsewhere, True Lake pipes hook straight up to the Header pipes, some will be a four into one flange to give the look of the four exhaust ports from the head on any bank, into the Lake pipe, others will be a large diameter pipe on entry into the Lake pipe that has a reducing pipe and flange to mate up with the Header pipe. The Lake pipe is the Muffler if you like, although they are not very restrictive when it comes to muffled sound. They do look great though on any modified vehicle.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 28/03/2008(UTC) Posts: 1,903
|
Thanks Geoff and all, Thats answered a few things,Id still like to get some though!It no doubt would lead to a few trips to the RTA...lol
Jim in Adelaide...Hindsight is bad vision! |
Jim in Adelaide.. |
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/06/2007(UTC) Posts: 582
|
quote: Originally posted by ozchevy
This is where things become silly, because as with the photo of the White Z/28 Camaro above, the pipes would not be any lower than the factory front Air dam, or Spoiler. The only things I see as an RTA violation - are noise decibels, danger caused by heat, and emissions.
True, but think of say, an HQ, where a lakes pipe would be below the line of any bodywork? "Silly modern cars" |
"Silly modern cars" |
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 28/03/2008(UTC) Posts: 1,903
|
thats the problem,you would have to have them coming out the front gaurds and remove your sill panels to gain height to make them legal,but then i think something else would be not legal.not to mention f@#!king up your van beyond repair.(well near enough beyond)
Jim in Adelaide...Hindsight is bad vision! |
Jim in Adelaide.. |
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.