quote:
according to Ben Stewart who gave me the build numbers for GTS 350s each year of HQ manufacture
Ben has accessed the information contained on the micro fische, which does contain build dates and sales date. It just depends on what information he recorded when he accessed the info.
We know that he recorded the 350 GTS and LS in HQ, but I do not think he counted all the Monaro, LS and GTS coupes.
We know he counted the HJ coupes, but these were all from one plant, he did not count the HJ sedans.
This info has nothing to do with all the info that many so helpfully contributed over 2 decades. This info gave us information on colour and trim, plus details on models not on Holden records.
The information is not complete, so although there are some definitive numbers, but others are just not available at this time.
Have you asked Ben for the nuber of 74 HJ LS, he may have recoreded them in date order and therefore just a matter of counting from 74 to 75.
Just think how big a task it would be to go through 400000 HQs looking for 350 engined coupes. Now add to that listing all 13000 HQ coupes. How easy would it be to miss one. Some cars are also listed inncorrectly on the Fische, had one recently, recorded as a 6 cylinder Premier sedan on the fische, car is GTS, interesting the engine listed against the 6 cylinder Premier is a 4.2 litre V8, confirmning the car is a GTS as the tags suggest.
I believe the numbers on HQ 350 coupes and sedans is correct as he would have chased the U prefix on the engine codes. The only problem would be iff someone put an R in the engine code accidently (I know of an HQ GTS 350 with an R engine code in the VIN, the reason the error occured is the Q37 code is used for GTS and GTS 350, the 81837 was ordered with no options and therefore when the VIN was done it came up as Q37 with no options so R code used.
The same applies to the GT Falcon numbers, there are cars that were added to it over the years, it is not 100%. Remeber a .01% data error on the HQ Fische would equate to over 400 errors. If you count key strokes then there is a possibilty of over 1200 errors. 1% error is acceptable in some areas, this would blow these to 40,000 and 120,000.
So back to the original question, have you emailed the register to ask the question?
Warren