Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

castellan Offline
#1 Posted : Saturday, 17 December 2011 11:18:49 PM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Power anyone interested.
Holden had 179 KW in DIN with the VT 5.0L but the last of the VS V8 ute's is rated at the same 179 KW, this can not be right at all ?
The motor is the same but it only has a single exhaust on the ute, the ute should of came with twin exhaust and i would believe it would be so.
So how did holden get away with rating it as so ?

Now my VY SS was rated at 235 KW and a mate had the same and both performed the same in every run we had but he bought a 250 KW VZ SS and my 235 KW always hosed it off ? my SS had more mid range power then his VZ.
The VZ is rated in ECE KW and that should be more accurate then DIN. has anyone got power grafts.
wbute Offline
#2 Posted : Sunday, 18 December 2011 6:24:17 AM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
I dont understand the issue? Why couldn't the VS ute make the same power as a VT? Twin exhaust does not mean it will make more power?
dirty davo Offline
#3 Posted : Sunday, 18 December 2011 11:44:58 PM(UTC)
dirty davo

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 23/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 690

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by wbute
I dont understand the issue? Why couldn't the VS ute make the same power as a VT? Twin exhaust does not mean it will make more power?


twin exhaust can make a difference

253 2bbl HT monaro with 336 diff & sag 4spd & twin system was quicker down th 1/4 than 307 2bbl with same diff & g/box & single system

regards DD

www.bellarineclassicautos.com.au
wbute Offline
#4 Posted : Monday, 19 December 2011 12:51:39 AM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Yes but as far as I can make out, the issue is that the earlier car should be rated at less power.
The statement is that for the ute to make the same power as the VY it would need a twin system. Twin systems don't always make more power, in fact I was under the impression that a 5 litre made more power with a good single system.
But that is irrelevant as Holden has listed them as the same power DIN which is measured with an exhaust system in place is it not? It may not be the same exhaust system as is on the car though is it? If that was the case they would have different power ratings for all models in a series even if they all had the exact same spec engine.
However, cars are not perfect, you could buy 10 identical cars and they would all feel different to drive.
As for the VY vs VZ, do they have the same diff ratio, gear box ratios, wheel size, driven by both drivers to do an accurate test? How many K's on each car and what condition is the engine in? To test two stock cars they need to be brand new for it to be accurate. And then you would need to test several and average the results.
Seat of the pants is a guess at best.
castellan Offline
#5 Posted : Friday, 23 December 2011 7:38:45 PM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by wbute
I dont understand the issue? Why couldn't the VS ute make the same power as a VT? Twin exhaust does not mean it will make more power?
The thing is we are talking std exhaust on the VS ute and the std VT sedan that is a twin exhaust and i am sure the twin is better. the 195 HSV VS ute had twin exhaust.
I had a 179 kw ute from new and it was a bit faster than my mates VS SS ute and we drove a 179KW VT SS and yes we both were sure the VT performed better than out utes.
Old mate put extractors and a single 3 inch on his ute and my ute ate his until he got his chiped then his just killed mine.

But getting back to the holden figures it has to be a load of bull as to the 179KW ute. so the DIN ruling must have noting to do with the ute as i think it's just ok'd by someone but not indeed fact.

The FG falcon 4.0L is rated at DIN but for only 91 fuel as 95 fuel it makes more power and with 98 more again.

And 179 KW 5.0L motor came out to run on 95 but people did not like to have to run 95 so holden just changed it to 91 to keep people happy but as sure as the cows come home in the morning i had to run 95 in my ute on a hot day or it was as gutless as when you got up it as the timing just retarded and killed it's power.
castellan Offline
#6 Posted : Friday, 23 December 2011 8:22:51 PM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by wbute
Yes but as far as I can make out, the issue is that the earlier car should be rated at less power.
The statement is that for the ute to make the same power as the VY it would need a twin system. Twin systems don't always make more power, in fact I was under the impression that a 5 litre made more power with a good single system.
But that is irrelevant as Holden has listed them as the same power DIN which is measured with an exhaust system in place is it not? It may not be the same exhaust system as is on the car though is it? If that was the case they would have different power ratings for all models in a series even if they all had the exact same spec engine.
However, cars are not perfect, you could buy 10 identical cars and they would all feel different to drive.
As for the VY vs VZ, do they have the same diff ratio, gear box ratios, wheel size, driven by both drivers to do an accurate test? How many K's on each car and what condition is the engine in? To test two stock cars they need to be brand new for it to be accurate. And then you would need to test several and average the results.
Seat of the pants is a guess at best.

They do have different power ratings for different exhaust on holden 5.7L gen3.
And yes they use the original exhaust to test them all.
Looky hear VZ Commodores V6 3.6L 190 KW @6500 -335 NM@ 3200RPM. and The AVENTRUA wagon has 188KW @ 6500 -330 NM @ 3600RPM ? exhaust.

Sure there will always be some difference in performance of the same type of car.
Testing at the rear wheels would not be as accurate as at the fly wheel.

As to the 253 vs 307 thing the 307 were so restricted in the HK-T just like the 308 with the single little exhaust that a twin or a good single 2 1/4 exhaust 253 would be all over them and the poor old 307 had only the 2BBL carby.
308's have to have good flowing exhaust or they are gutless and all single sound like crap, in all V8 and i have tried both and a good twin is always better performing and you don't get that sicking drone.
wbute Offline
#7 Posted : Saturday, 24 December 2011 9:23:31 AM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
I drive trucks with 2700hp V16 diesels at work. They all put out different power due to the hours on the engines etc. Some pull 2nd gear up steep ramps, others won't. They are all rated the same though. All engines vary from manufacturers specs. thats life.
wbute Offline
#8 Posted : Saturday, 24 December 2011 9:24:44 AM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
They have twin systems big enough to stick a 308 inside by the way.
castellan Offline
#9 Posted : Wednesday, 28 December 2011 2:02:24 AM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
wbute what has that got to do with it.
V12 diesels how boring.
They do not test old f ed engines at all now do they when doing a DIN.
Yes with all engines even the same from new there can be ones that perform better or less but if you had a good look see you would find out why it is so.
You are right about that some single perform better than some twins. and i found out the hard way with my 308 listing to all these drips going on about how good the single is they had no idea the toss that made the single was so convinced that my car would perform so much better bagging my twin on my p van and the fact was it killed performce that much that it did not even spin the rear wheels anymore when the auto went in to 2ed gear.
I think the toss pots were compearing VB to VL commodores std twin to a good 2 1/2 single, idiots! just like the foolish dopes that had no idea how to tune an engine at all and how many times did i come across a lot of them so called A grade morons that just put every thing back to std spec and the engine is not stock standard.
If you open up the exhaust it could help to jet it to perform.
wbute Offline
#10 Posted : Wednesday, 28 December 2011 4:47:08 PM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Not to mention the engines are in different series cars. Is the weight the same between both cars?
Peak power ratings only tell you the peak power at a certain rev point. You need to consider the torque figures as well.
I know diesels are boring, but it shows how several engines all rated the same can perform totally differently. The quoted power figures are inaccurate in the real world.

Keeo Offline
#11 Posted : Wednesday, 28 December 2011 9:09:46 PM(UTC)
Keeo

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/10/2009(UTC)
Posts: 164






Me and a mate were looking at a couple of 68-70s chev blocks to rebuild and he pointed out how one was a better casting because it more central to the core.Looking at the back of the block cam hole was clearly to one side .His theory was the block was weaker and may run hot / cold sided .Could this cause power loss ?Ok some older motors had a bit more spirit than the next a lucky build due to every part being perfectly weighted and assembled with perfect clearances by chance ,and that first start up bedded in like a dream. a bit deep ah well. Back to the present quality controll would have all this sorted or would it ?Ive always wondered about power of new cars they claim x amount of kws and have a badge that states it but the tuning feels like its being held back(ive only driven 3 new cars )so maybee its a safety thing.Apparently some Hemi cars were underated with hp to get them to sell imagine that .














petaus Offline
#12 Posted : Thursday, 29 December 2011 6:53:20 AM(UTC)
petaus

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/11/2006(UTC)
Posts: 543

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
just by looking at the cam tunnel will not tell you if it had core shift in the bores, there are other tools to gauge bore thickness, i once read that chev v8,s were all within 5h.p of each other when dyno tested and timing set, that is i.e same spec engine how is that for mass produced and all eight pistions were fitted in under thirty seconds, the chev v8 had the leat amount of sand cores to produce a block less chance of core shift and chev just made there 100 millionth v8 in december.
pete
wbute Offline
#13 Posted : Thursday, 29 December 2011 6:11:51 PM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
If the engines were all built to blue print specs then maybe they would be close to the rated HP rating. They are not though, they are a mass produced engine built to sell cars to make money for the share holders.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (5)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.089 seconds.