Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

4 Pages123>»
Jul71-Oct74 Offline
#1 Posted : Wednesday, 6 March 2013 9:17:37 PM(UTC)
Jul71-Oct74

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 22/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 125

Hi All
I have been wanting to ask this one for a fair while and seeing it has been a bit quiet here lately, now seems a good time to get some opinions.
Here is the question: For a lot of people Peter Brock is the greatest Aussie touring car driver ever. Its hard to argue against his success and his popularity with the fans at Bathurst and other tracks is legendary.
But just doing some searching on other sites, it seems that some hold a different view. While very few doubt his talent as a driver, there is a popular opinion that at least part of his phenomenal success was due to having huge backing from Holden that gave him a car that was in many ways superior to those of his opponents.
I think the guys on Top Gear Australia mentioned this aspect of the Brock legend when they did a feature on him.
So what is your opinion on the Brock legend?
Do you think he was simply the best driver ever, a genius without peer, or do you take a more moderate view of the man and his legacy?
Warren Turnbull Offline
#2 Posted : Wednesday, 6 March 2013 11:48:27 PM(UTC)
Warren Turnbull

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 10/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,357

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 28 time(s) in 27 post(s)
There is no doubt that in a sport where you need to use equipment, that the equipment is critical in success. Ie do you think they would be getig the results in cycling if they used standard bikes. He who has the best bike increases his chances of success.

In saying that you have to compare the top drivers at the time. Bond was a great driver both on the track and dirt, whch Brock was not.

Moffat was good in a number of series, he ran the Mustang as well as the Falcons.

Interestingly Johnson ran an HDT XU1 at lakeside when the LH came out and was very competetive with the HDT car compared to his XU1. (they gave him the car for the day. Had Johnson become part of HDT we may never of heard of Brock. The difference being Johnson was in Queensland. Many who saw Johnson running up hear beleive him to be the better driver in the early 70s)

There is no doubt that there were a number of top class drivers during that period, and Brock was definatley one of the best of them. But I would agree that the cars he drove had a lot of input to ensure they were winning.

He was high profile right from the early 70s and was able to pull good sponsorship to build great cars to go racing.

Warren
ReplicarSLR Offline
#3 Posted : Thursday, 7 March 2013 1:38:17 AM(UTC)
ReplicarSLR

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 1/12/2007(UTC)
Posts: 13

Brock was indeed a great driver and taking nothing away from the great man but:

He had some of the best engineers behind him most of the time, the big corporate money later on which ensured this continued.
Corporation was happy because they were winning, hence were selling more of their product, so corporation was getting their moneys worth, so handed over more $ meaning engineers could develop better products to keep producing a winning car, so the engineers were were happy, Brock got better car, kept winning and thus the circle kept going.

Now taking nothing away from Brock as I stated at the start, if it wasn't for Brocks driving and his good ability to provide great feedback to the engineers and his ability to adapt if there was any engineering issue I don't think it would have turned out as it did. Brock was the keystone to to the whole thing and it was his his driving ability that kept the whole thing going.

Await Flak now LOL

Edited by user Thursday, 7 March 2013 1:39:45 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Dr Terry Offline
#4 Posted : Thursday, 7 March 2013 2:14:47 AM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
IMHO, Peter Brock was one of the most naturally talented touring car drivers this country has ever seen. He had the ability to just jump into a car (any car) & get the best out of it very quickly. Yes, he did have some of the best equipment at some points in time, but he could still make a crappy car work.

Look at his success when he was away from HDT, he won the 1975 Bathurst as a private entry on a shoestring budget. Again, when he ran Team Brock in 1976/77 out of the Bill Patterson dealership, he went very well.

Look at the success of his horrible little home-built Holden-powered Austin A30, that's when Harry Firth took notice. Again look at the 1987 Bathurst where he was awarded the win after the Eggenberger Sierras were disqualified, that VL was a box of spare parts, his good car killed its engine mid-race so he swapped cars into the 'dunger' & still won.

He had success in the 1979 Repco trial, yes great cars & good back-up but he out-performed the other (more experienced at rally) drivers in the same team.

The current record of M. Skaife & C.Lowndes of who has had the most ATCC rounds (90 each) is dwarfed by Brock's record, if you include all those Bathursts, Sandowns, Endurance & Manufacturer Championships that he won. None of these were part of the ATCC back then.

The only other tin top drivers who I've witnessed with anything approaching his natural ability were Ian (Pete) Geoghegan & Norm Beechey.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
Premier 350 Offline
#5 Posted : Thursday, 7 March 2013 2:21:09 AM(UTC)
Premier 350

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 564
Man
Australia
Location: On a build over WWII airfield. Got the .50 cal cases from my driveway to prove it

Thanks: 31 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 8 post(s)
I was going to weigh in,but Dr Terry has said it all so well.

I'd forgotten the "privater" sucesses he had- we all tend to think of Brock and HDT as welded together.

Personally I don't think he's quite as good as he's rated.
But he's close, very, very close to it.
Attn camry drivers. The accelerator is the skinny pedal on the right.
wbute Offline
#6 Posted : Thursday, 7 March 2013 2:53:35 AM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
He was clearly light years ahead in the wet.
They don't stick average drivers in the best teams and the best cars. They have the best drivers.
He was fast in any car. 1987 at Bathurst he hopped in his small budget teams second car. As he said himself, that car was not expected to even finish the race. You may remember how much faster that car lapped with him in it. He pushed it from no where to 3rd place (eventual winner months later).
To say he was anything but an excellent driver is tall popy syndrome.
wbute Offline
#7 Posted : Thursday, 7 March 2013 2:56:09 AM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Dick Johnson is famous because he was Peter Brocks rival and he hit a rock. Alan Moffat is famous because he was Peter Brocks rival.
Dr Terry Offline
#8 Posted : Thursday, 7 March 2013 6:14:20 AM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by wbute
Dick Johnson is famous because he was Peter Brocks rival and he hit a rock. Alan Moffat is famous because he was Peter Brocks rival.

I think that is a little unfair.

Moffat's ability to make his tyres go the distance in the 1969 race showed his empathy with a race car. His record in a Ford is unsurpassed from 1969 to 1978. He was fiercely competitive, but he was a win or DNF man. Have a look at his Bathurst record.

Dick Johnson was the right man at the right time. If he never got his Tru Blue XD to beat the Commodores when there was no one else in a Ford you may not have heard of him. That XD was perhaps a lot faster than it should have been. His life would have panned out a lot differently if he hadn't hit a certain rock at Bathurst in 1980.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
HK1837 Offline
#9 Posted : Thursday, 7 March 2013 6:24:49 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
Also don't forget Brock should have at least one more Bathurst win credited to him, he was robbed by a lap scoring mistake which really was his first of 10 wins. Also another win was his, only to be robbed by 2 x stuff-ups by his co-driver. Add those in and you have:

1969, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1987.

Plus a win in the 2003 back in a proper Holden where it all started (ie a Monaro!).

An impressive career if those was all he ever won.

No he wasn't the best husband, person or perhaps father. But like Shane Warne those things are irrelevant when you look at the ability of the man in his chosen sport.

I think if you could ask him today, he'd also give great credit to 2 x men for 6 of those Bathurst wins: Jim Richards and Larry Perkins.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
wbute Offline
#10 Posted : Thursday, 7 March 2013 7:45:26 AM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Not unfair at all. Moffat and Johnson had little public charisma to go with their ability. To be next to Brock lifted their profile enormously. Brock lifted touring cars as a race series. Ask joe blow today who is a great driver and they will give you a blank look and then say Peter Brock.
commodorenut Offline
#11 Posted : Thursday, 7 March 2013 9:22:25 AM(UTC)
commodorenut

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 2/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 3,135

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 35 time(s) in 33 post(s)
I think that while there may be an inclination to attribute some of his success to team preparation & equipment, the points above about 1975 & 1987 showed his winning capability with low-budget machinery.

There's no denying he had natural driving ability - being able to 'read' a car through the seat of his pants, and quickly adapt to anything - even the Ford guys give him credit for that.

I had the opportunity to watch in-car video footage of him driving the Daytona Coupe on wet, greasy roads prior to that fateful hour - his steering reflexes were working overtime to keep the car straight, and fast. Most 30 year olds would struggle to match what he was continuing to do at twice their age.

Other drivers have certainly come close in raw talent & skill - some may have even surpassed him, but Brock was the complete package - he was great at PR in a time when many other drivers ignored their fans, and he did what his sponsors asked of him. He became the likeable face of motor racing in Australia. Others realised the importance of this many years later, but by then the Brock legend had already been cemented in the hearts of many Aussies.

Could some of those drivers had more success with bigger budgets? Maybe so? But if they had the level of raw talent that Brock displayed, would they not have been noticed & brought on board by the big budget teams?
Cheers,

Mick
_______________________________________________________________

Judge a successful man not on how he treats his peers, but on how he treats those less fortunate.
Dr Terry Offline
#12 Posted : Thursday, 7 March 2013 5:36:19 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by HK1837
Also don't forget Brock should have at least one more Bathurst win credited to him, he was robbed by a lap scoring mistake which really was his first of 10 wins. Also another win was his, only to be robbed by 2 x stuff-ups by his co-driver. Add those in and you have:

1969, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1987.


I agree with 1973, that was a race that he lost thru no fault of his own, he should have won it, but that's racing !!

I do have problems with the supposed 1969 'win' though. I've been thru the lap charts with a Ford/Bathurst nut & I can't see the 'mistake', certainly not like the 1976 Harvey 'win' anyway.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
Warren Turnbull Offline
#13 Posted : Thursday, 7 March 2013 7:44:41 PM(UTC)
Warren Turnbull

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 10/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,357

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 28 time(s) in 27 post(s)
I agree with you Terry. I first heard about the 69 win in 1998 and tried to confirm that Bond was in front or behind Des West.

Eventually I found the only person that would know, and that was Bruce Mcphee. Why he knew was:

He came second
he ran every lap bar one
He was friends with Des West

So I asked him if he was chasing Bond or West in 69 and he stated Bond. I was face to face with him at the time and there was no amzment etc on his face thaqt I was asking this question.

I see no reason to doubt him as I can see no reason for him to lie about the result all these years later.

Warren
Robbo Offline
#14 Posted : Thursday, 7 March 2013 9:15:56 PM(UTC)
Robbo

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 21/09/2007(UTC)
Posts: 276

Thanks: 1 times
Allan Moffat would have won Bathurst in 69, except for the fact he was ordered to pit, to change tyres that didn't need changing. His tyre's were fine, because he knew how to drive the car, unlike many other's whose tyre's kept blowing out.
There Is No Replacement For Displacement.
Dr Terry Offline
#15 Posted : Thursday, 7 March 2013 11:42:17 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by Robbo
Allan Moffat would have won Bathurst in 69, except for the fact he was ordered to pit, to change tyres that didn't need changing. His tyre's were fine, because he knew how to drive the car, unlike many other's whose tyre's kept blowing out.

Very true, but I think we could fill a book on Bathursts that 'got away'. I'm sure that the Geoghegan brothers & Glen Seton would feature also.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
Jul71-Oct74 Offline
#16 Posted : Friday, 8 March 2013 6:49:46 AM(UTC)
Jul71-Oct74

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 22/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 125

Hi Guys
Thanks for your comments. Its hard not to agree with everything that has been said one way or the other.
For what it is worth, my opinion is that while he was always one of the very best drivers, there were others that could do a lap of Mount Panorama with the same level of skill.
I can remember sitting on the top of the mountain next to some drunken yob screaming his head off for Brock when 05 would go by when in reality, the car was being piloted at that moment by Richards or Perkins.
The point is you couldn't tell who the actual driver was as they were so close in skill level anyway.

But there is more to Peter Brock than just his driving ability. In the 80s my older brother was a manager for Mobil at their now defunct Sydney facility. Managers were entitled to passes to the Mobil hospitality tent at Bathurst each year. Strange as it may seem, most of the managers were not really into cars and were not interested in spending their long weekend at Bathurst.

We used to use the passes and of course as the major sponsor of the dealer team, the drivers would mingle and give speeches at the end of the race.
One year John Harvey came in and addressed the Mobil people after the race. He is a good speaker and a nice guy, but it was very obvious that everyone wanted to hear from Brockie.
When he came into the tent the reaction was astounding. Just by being in the room, he put everybody else into the shade.
And for me that is a great part of the Brock legend. He had a natural charisma that made him stand out from his peers.

Another sportsman who seemes to have a similar gift would be Shane Warne. Love him or hate him, there are cricket fans all over the world that would do anything to see him play.
Brockie had the same effect on his fans and was lucky enough to have two gifts. Driving ability and a magnetic personality.
HK1837 Offline
#17 Posted : Friday, 8 March 2013 8:13:09 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by Dr Terry
quote:
Originally posted by Robbo
Allan Moffat would have won Bathurst in 69, except for the fact he was ordered to pit, to change tyres that didn't need changing. His tyre's were fine, because he knew how to drive the car, unlike many other's whose tyre's kept blowing out.

Very true, but I think we could fill a book on Bathursts that 'got away'. I'm sure that the Geoghegan brothers & Glen Seton would feature also.

Dr Terry


I agree. The exact same style of argument could be applied to 1973 and 1974 for Brock and Bond respectively, which would have seen no Ford wins between 1971 and 1977.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Dr Terry Offline
#18 Posted : Friday, 8 March 2013 9:08:31 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
It must be in the Australian psyche to elevate the likes of Peter Brock & Shane Warne to God-like status. In their private lives these guys were a long way from perfect (or even acceptable for that matter), but they were the best in their chosen profession & because of that all else is forgiven.

Is Ned Kelly in the same boat ? Are we the only people in the world who think that a criminal scumbag like Ned Kelly is some sort of hero ?

Am I getting off track ?

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
HK1837 Offline
#19 Posted : Friday, 8 March 2013 9:31:12 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
You are forgetting about Billy the Kid! And others like him. So not just an Aussie thing.

I was in Armidale yesterday, drove on Thunderbolts Way, saw the sign to Thunderbolt's grave and drove past Thunderbolt's rock, so not just confined to old Ned either!
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
edelbrock1 Offline
#20 Posted : Friday, 8 March 2013 9:57:27 PM(UTC)
edelbrock1

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 22/06/2005(UTC)
Posts: 470

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by Dr Terry
It must be in the Australian psyche to elevate the likes of Peter Brock & Shane Warne to God-like status. In their private lives these guys were a long way from perfect (or even acceptable for that matter), but they were the best in their chosen profession & because of that all else is forgiven.


Dr Terry


Exactly Doc. People either have no idea what Brock got up to in his private life, or they chose to ignore it because as you say he had been elevated to god like status.

Larry Perkins, now there is a guy that can steer a car and a true gentleman as well. Didnt squeal like a pig when the Sierra's were whipping the commodores, just got down to business doing the best job that he could with the equipment he had.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (9)
4 Pages123>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.123 seconds.