Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

5 Pages<1234>»
kookaburra Offline
#21 Posted : Wednesday, 19 February 2014 9:06:54 AM(UTC)
kookaburra

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/04/2010(UTC)
Posts: 49

Where do you get the Philipino Nannie for $200 a week ? Mate had one , cost him $300,ooo.
johnperth Offline
#22 Posted : Friday, 21 February 2014 5:56:16 AM(UTC)
johnperth

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,991

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
you would need a nurse more than a nanny wouldn't you mate?
kookaburra Offline
#23 Posted : Friday, 21 February 2014 6:54:06 AM(UTC)
kookaburra

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/04/2010(UTC)
Posts: 49

Thats probabally right ,Ill settle for a nurse at my age.
johnperth Offline
#24 Posted : Friday, 21 February 2014 7:06:10 AM(UTC)
johnperth

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,991

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
I see france is investing 3 billion euro about 4 billion dollars to peugot/citroen to bail it out. with china going half. bit more than the request of gmh/ford.
Dr Terry Offline
#25 Posted : Friday, 21 February 2014 5:00:20 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
Peugeot/Citroen have been struggling for years, I thought that they were already under government administration.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
wbute Offline
#26 Posted : Friday, 21 February 2014 5:34:19 PM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Why is it that all car manufacturers need to be proped up by tax payers?
HK1837 Online
#27 Posted : Friday, 21 February 2014 6:00:13 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
Basically because they want to keep manufacturing and jobs and the playing field with Thailand and South Korea is not a level one. Plus in some countries Union pressure forces the governments hand.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
wbute Offline
#28 Posted : Saturday, 22 February 2014 2:31:55 AM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
That doesn't really wash with me. They are like any other business. They either make a product at a profit or they should fail. Why does the car industry need all the special treatment? Mcdonalds employ a lot of people as do a thousand other companies.
So why the special treatment for the car industry?
HK1837 Online
#29 Posted : Saturday, 22 February 2014 2:47:24 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
McDonalds can't build burgers and fries and ship them over here from Thailand.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Dr Terry Offline
#30 Posted : Saturday, 22 February 2014 2:59:52 AM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
Also McDonalds workers don't have an AMWU (or similar) to contend with.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
HK1837 Online
#31 Posted : Saturday, 22 February 2014 4:13:16 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
Trouble is Terry, even if you halved the wages of workers on the Australian assembly lines and changed nothing else I still reckon it'd be tough to compete. Working in manufacturing industries here and also running your own business you get to see all the red tape involved with employment, safety and environment. The cost alone of compliance in those areas is phenomonal and it is a cost that manufacturing in some countries simply do not have to burden. I'm not saying we should halve wages and scrap most employment, safety and environmental compliance, but at the end of the day that is what I think it would take to give us a level playing field with Korea, Thailand and Malaysia.
I really do think that somehow Australia needs to do what the plasterers had to do when Gyprock hit the market, ie find other things we are good at. Possibly rather than Government propping up a faltering car industry they really need to be investing in something else to create jobs. What that is i'm not sure, but I do know whatever it is it needs to be something that doesn't have major employment, safety or environment compliance and does not have significant Union involvement or it'll never compete.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
wbute Offline
#32 Posted : Saturday, 22 February 2014 7:29:42 AM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Oh you miss the point. Big companies like Coles employ massive numbers and run their business successfully. Car manufacturers are incapable of running a business without a handout. Why so?
Dr Terry Offline
#33 Posted : Saturday, 22 February 2014 7:59:10 AM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by wbute
Oh you miss the point. Big companies like Coles employ massive numbers and run their business successfully. Car manufacturers are incapable of running a business without a handout. Why so?


Because Coles just resell mostly imported product & their staff is paid way less. For example area managers with 8-10 years experience get less than unskilled auto assembly plant workers. Finally & most importantly they don't actually produce anything.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
HK1837 Online
#34 Posted : Saturday, 22 February 2014 8:18:36 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
And to add to Dr Terry's point, they and Woolies have been a big part of what has killed off food manufacturing as well, by screwing the producers.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
commodorenut Offline
#35 Posted : Saturday, 22 February 2014 10:19:45 AM(UTC)
commodorenut

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 2/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 3,135

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 35 time(s) in 33 post(s)
And add to that the corporate greed where they are demanding >50% margin on the products that they sell.
Cheers,

Mick
_______________________________________________________________

Judge a successful man not on how he treats his peers, but on how he treats those less fortunate.
wbute Offline
#36 Posted : Saturday, 22 February 2014 6:10:34 PM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
You can all see then that they run successful business in Australia. We all agree on that. Yet GM can not. The reason that other business like The ones suggested survive is because they supply a product people either want or need. Perhaps if car manufacturers supplied cars were cheaper to build and maybe spent less on new model development they would survive on their own two feet.
You will actually find Coles and Woolworths are two of the largest companies in Australia. You will also find Coles is owned by Westfarmers. If you do some research you will find why Westfarmers which started as a farmer cooperative in WA has survived. They diversified. Car manufacturers cry poor but the reality is they have no diversification of risk and have come to rely on our handouts. They are badly run companies.
Dr Terry Offline
#37 Posted : Saturday, 22 February 2014 7:14:07 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by wbute
You can all see then that they run successful business in Australia. We all agree on that. Yet GM can not.


Or Nissan Aust. (closed 1994), Or Mitsubishi Aust. (closed 2008), Or Ford Aust. (soon to close) Or Toyota (soon to close), Or Peugeot/Citroen in France or just about every other car manufacturer in the developed world. They all need (or needed) assistance.

Why single out GM ??

There are plenty of successful businesses in Australia, but sadly most of them don't involve labour intensive manufacturing. Where are all our clothing or shoe makers gone ? Why is most of our furniture imported ?? We used to make the best TV & radios in the world, when was the last time you saw electronic consumer item that was actually made in Australia ?

The money is in the importing & selling, not in the manufacture of the goods. Guess what Holden, Ford & Toyota will be soon ? 100% importers, that's what. They will probably make a profit too.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
wbute Offline
#38 Posted : Saturday, 22 February 2014 8:41:22 PM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Correct. All car manufacturers are badly run. They all need tax payer assistance. Why? You can't tell me they are not getting a backhander to move them into Thailand can you?
wbute Offline
#39 Posted : Saturday, 22 February 2014 9:06:04 PM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
From what I have noticed at the large mining company I work at there is a basic problem with the management of big companies. They promote new staff from the bottom up. They train them for the roles. There in lies the problem. They just end up with terrible management practices entrenched in the fabric of the company. They have no accountability for mistakes and the bigger they get the bigger the mistakes become.
Now both government and the manufacturers have become addicted to the idea they are providing jobs through support. It is clear this does not work in the long run though isn't it. All those jobs are now gone. In reality this interference has come at the expense of a properly run company and job creation. Government has no place trying to create jobs in this way.
castellan Offline
#40 Posted : Sunday, 23 February 2014 4:57:51 AM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by wbute
You can all see then that they run successful business in Australia. We all agree on that. Yet GM can not. The reason that other business like The ones suggested survive is because they supply a product people either want or need. Perhaps if car manufacturers supplied cars were cheaper to build and maybe spent less on new model development they would survive on their own two feet.
You will actually find Coles and Woolworths are two of the largest companies in Australia. You will also find Coles is owned by Westfarmers. If you do some research you will find why Westfarmers which started as a farmer cooperative in WA has survived. They diversified. Car manufacturers cry poor but the reality is they have no diversification of risk and have come to rely on our handouts. They are badly run companies.
I will say that HK1837 is right.

Holden badly run i don't think so really, some stupid trendy fools making the decisions like a bigger heavier VE commodore at the time i could not believe it and a more impractical ute mainly for softies not real working men.
It's our governments that are the problem and our foolish backwards unions that are a problem let run loose.

If you look at how GM got going after WW2, now they were smart people good dammit. i think there were very switched on people at the top who knew much more than the ones running it today when it comes to common sense and overall knowledge but today we have all these little twerps and there small field they only know, it's like the Banks the manager years ago knew everything but not nowadays they don't.
A company like GM going down the drain is no excuse, someone is a idiot for not seeing it all coming.

In Australia with our car industry we never could survive without the Government support right from the beginning you know. and now we see gov morons saying they are not going to support it anymore because they say it's costing them money. well well they have just woke up to it now and people are all up in arms about it all.
I never heard a peep about it with the tariffs we had always had, like up to 70% you know.

I think virgin air is trying to destroy our aussie mob playing a game but our gov should checkmate that low life bastard. that's there job looking after aussie voters, not other dickheads.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (4)
5 Pages<1234>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.097 seconds.