Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

Munromad2004 Offline
#1 Posted : Sunday, 21 August 2005 1:35:48 AM(UTC)
Munromad2004

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2005(UTC)
Posts: 718

Hi all,

I had a look at a car advertised as a HQ GTS/4 yesterday and I could tell it was not genuine but was just curious about a few things.

I own a couple of HQ GTS/4's and am very familiar with identifying Monaro's but am not so familiar with codes for Kingswoods, Statesman's etc.

The tag on this vehicle was 81469QL179089 and it was a Kingswood style body shell (ie not a Statesman shell)

I didn't write down the full paint and trim codes but I do remember that the trim code ended in 'N' and it had a seating capacity listed as 6. I think the build date was around 3/73.

To me it looks as if it has been fitted with ID plates from an Adelaide built HQ Statesman Deville V8..

I'm sure it's not a HQ GTS/4 as it would have either 80469 or 8W69 (depending on manufacture date) with a trim code of W, X, Y or Z.
There were also no HQ GTS/4's built with bench seats that I'm aware of so the seating capacity of 6 doesn't match either.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.

The car was totally stripped with the majority of the parts in the boot but looked mostly complete with the exception of the motor.
It did have a beautiful condition GTS dash facia with a complete set of gauges in excellent condition bagged up in the boot.
It had GTS guards and was a very rust free looking shell.

No GTS steering wheel or rims.

Why would someone stick a set of Statesman ID plates on what looks like a Kingswood body shell? Can anyone see any benefit to this?

The vehicle was being sold by a storage place in Adelaide to recover unpaid storage fees and he was open to offers for 1 week. The seller told me he was going to accept a $1000 offer he had on it this morning if I didn't beat that offer.

It had some good parts but I wasn't going to offer that much for it although it may have been worth that in parts alone. It appeared to have a Turbo400 transmission too (but I'm no expert).

Can someone let me know if a trim code of 'N' is a Statesman code as I am curious about that.

The seller was quite concerned that he had advertised it as a GTS and was having a mental dilemma about whether or not to tell the buyer who had offered $1000. He was concerned that the buyer may have some comeback down the track if he discovered it was not genuine.


Guest
#2 Posted : Sunday, 21 August 2005 8:32:58 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
The 1469 in one of my books says that it is a statesman de ville V8 the L1 says it was made in adelaide. The build date of 3/73 does not go by my other book, up to 30/9/72 the vins had the numbers after that the went to a letter prefix....eg 8P37 some one
Guest
#3 Posted : Sunday, 21 August 2005 11:51:29 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
quote:
Why would someone stick a set of Statesman ID plates on what looks like a Kingswood body shell? Can anyone see any benefit to this?
Guest
#4 Posted : Sunday, 21 August 2005 12:03:10 PM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
quote:
He was concerned that the buyer may have some comeback down the track
Taz2 Offline
#5 Posted : Sunday, 21 August 2005 4:54:11 PM(UTC)
Taz2

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 258

To the best of my knowledge, all HQ Monaros had a seating capacity of 5.
There are more trim codes than X,Y,& Z .....E,S & R were also used in the Monaros up to '73 then an even wider range in '74.
The fact that the vehicle has been dismantled, put in s

Edited by user Sunday, 21 August 2005 5:20:48 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

In thrust we trust
johnperth Offline
#6 Posted : Monday, 22 August 2005 8:13:55 AM(UTC)
johnperth

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,991

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Problem is even if you buy it in good faith if you rebuild it and when you go to register it the traffic people find it is stolen the police will confiscate it off you and give it back to the original owner.
This happened to a guy in England (whose laws
johnperth Offline
#7 Posted : Monday, 22 August 2005 8:16:06 AM(UTC)
johnperth

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,991

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Of course if you have wrecked it by then and sold all the bits all they can recover from you is the money you got, if you can't say who you sold it to.
cloudy Offline
#8 Posted : Monday, 22 August 2005 5:34:13 PM(UTC)
cloudy

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,047

You may find that the car could have been defected by the police and a donor cars rego used on the car as to hide its identity with other plates.
This practise is common amongst unlawful minded people.
I have had in the past whilst wrecking a HQ prem a
Munromad2004 Offline
#9 Posted : Monday, 22 August 2005 10:53:36 PM(UTC)
Munromad2004

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2005(UTC)
Posts: 718

There is a bit more to this story that I didn't mention as I was really only curious about the plates.

The storage place owner was doing everything legit and was legally entitled to sell the car.

He told me that a woman had put it in storage and pai
wayne Offline
#10 Posted : Monday, 22 August 2005 11:44:16 PM(UTC)
wayne

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/08/2005(UTC)
Posts: 86

no one should advise you that the shells will not be looked at as the insurance company puts a notice on the rta computer and if it stolen then it is up to them if they take it back chances are that these are ok
and you should be carfull who you ask abou
First
On
Race
Day
HK1837 Offline
#11 Posted : Tuesday, 23 August 2005 1:02:23 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,738

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 515 time(s) in 491 post(s)
It looks to me like the ADR tag may be original for the body, and the VIN has come off a Statesman. Initially I thought that perhaps 814 had been stamped instead of 804, but the 3/73 date means it should have had 8Q69 on the VIN. Also, I don't think you c
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Guest
#12 Posted : Tuesday, 23 August 2005 2:36:41 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Hi, I had a factory 6 seater HQ DeVille, sold it long ago so don't have the numbers for it. It was the dark silver/grey with black vinyl roof.
Tom
Dr Terry Offline
#13 Posted : Tuesday, 23 August 2005 3:26:27 AM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,067

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 206 time(s) in 187 post(s)
Hi Guys.

The 6 front bench seat was standard issue in all HQ Devilles, front buckets with or without console shift are optional.

Also re:- the ADR compliance plate, the chassis number on this plate should be the same as that stamped next to the stee
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
HK1837 Offline
#14 Posted : Tuesday, 23 August 2005 8:38:03 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,738

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 515 time(s) in 491 post(s)
You learn something everyday - I always thought the bench was only available in a HQ Custom. Still, the ADR plate can't be off a GTS/4 as it has 6 seats, and it can't belong to the VIN plate as it is a much earlier plate than the ADR plate.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
HK1837 Offline
#15 Posted : Thursday, 25 August 2005 5:53:23 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,738

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 515 time(s) in 491 post(s)
I had the VIN checked. It's off a 7/71 Statesman Deville with L30 engine ie 350 Statesman. Fully loaded as well ie air, steer, LSD etc. I suspect that someone has transferred all of the 350 Stateman stuff across, including the VIN and Body plates, to a 4-
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Guest
#16 Posted : Thursday, 25 August 2005 6:25:12 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Was there such a thing as a 350 powered GTS/4? I thought they were all 253/308 powered.

Cheers...Dave
HK1837 Offline
#17 Posted : Thursday, 25 August 2005 5:35:59 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,738

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 515 time(s) in 491 post(s)
Yes, but GTS/4 is just a moniker. They were really V8 Kingswoods ie 80469 with XV4 option (253/308) or XW8 option (ie 350), however the GTS350 was always regarded as a 'premium performance' vehicle, in the same light as an 81837. The later examples (XV4 o
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Guest
#18 Posted : Thursday, 25 August 2005 6:16:13 PM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Thanks for that info Byron. I've never heard of one...

Cheers...Dave
Munromad2004 Offline
#19 Posted : Thursday, 25 August 2005 11:00:29 PM(UTC)
Munromad2004

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2005(UTC)
Posts: 718

I suspect you're right Byron. Someone was probably trying to pass it off as a 350 GTS/4.

I wish I had copied all the details down but i only have what I can remember. As soon as I saw the tags I knew it wasn't genuine.

Also I'm not disagreeing wit
HK1837 Offline
#20 Posted : Friday, 26 August 2005 8:07:10 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,738

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 515 time(s) in 491 post(s)
As I said, they were always intended to be 'premium performance', especially the XW8. Holden never tried to 'hide' them so to speak by making them a different model like for example the 81837 GTS327. Incidentally, the GTS327 was all set to be an 80737 wit
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Users browsing this topic
Guest (5)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.107 seconds.