Rank: Guest
Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
|
hey all what dus a 2b ww stromy flow?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 2/06/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,664
|
I THINK ITS ABOUT 200 CFM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/07/2006(UTC)
Posts: 313
|
Closer to 350 cfm , i used to use them on speedway cars and always flowed the same as a holley 350
MONARO!!WHERE!!NICE |
MONARO!!WHERE!!NICE |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/04/2005(UTC)
Posts: 758
|
Dave is right...around 350cfm, maybe higher. So a Holley 350 is a good match. WW has larger throats though. A few mm bigger in diameter than Holley 350.
Cheers John
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 2/06/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,664
|
why do people use 350 hollys then??????
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/04/2005(UTC)
Posts: 758
|
Hi Vintage,
I can tell you that a Holley 350 with a manual box gives heaps better economy than a WW does. They sound better, seem to have more poke down low too.
John
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
|
I do remember talking with someone who has a fair bit of insite into both of these type of carbies, He said that you'll mostly find that the Holley will flatspot as they are far too large and the WW is a far better choice as they flow "around" 280 cfm as
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
