Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

Guest
#1 Posted : Monday, 29 August 2005 8:19:46 PM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Some years ago I developed a theory relating to measuring the efficiency of balanced systems or nearly balanced systems (according to the laws of physics ).
It was not until later, I realized that the combustion engine of a motor car was in itself a balanced system. Or rather the individual pistons within cylinders were systems within the overall system of the engine! (They could be considered individual motors making up a part of the total motor)
Anyway getting back to the theory - This required the monitoring of the system over a time frame of five timing points and at the end of that time to come to a logical conclusion as to whether the system was operating as efficiently as it could be or if there should be a small adjustment made!
This theory could then be applied to each cylinder of a combustion engine. There would be one timing point at top dead centre, a second at the bottom of the downstroke and three others in between.
The monitoring of the system would be via the compression ratio at each timing point per cylinder. Those five readings could be linked to get an overall picture of the performance of each cylinder.
ie.
1 - 2
1 - 3
1 - 4
1 - 5
2 - 3
2 - 4
2 - 5
3 - 4
3 - 5
4 - 5
These figures can be fed into a computer for analysis of exactly how much fuel that particular cylinder required injecting.
I am convinced this theory would work and would result in -

1. Greater fuel economy.

2. Greater horsepower for size of motor.

3. Greater Torque.

4. Smoother throttle for all loads.

5. Less maintenance costs.

6. Less emissions.

7. Cooler running.

I also am convinced that much of the present gadgetry on modern engines would not be required and would remain obsolete. With the cost of fuel rising exponentially the further we get into this Century, I believe it is imperative that we run smaller cars with more efficient engines.

In creating this article I wish it to be known that I am a layperson with very limited access to working on motor engines. All of my theories have been derived from logic! Excuse the pretty rough explanation involved!

With Kind Regards,

taurus26
Guest
#2 Posted : Wednesday, 31 August 2005 2:06:48 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Far Out!
treborsenrab Offline
#3 Posted : Thursday, 1 September 2005 1:47:33 AM(UTC)
treborsenrab

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 1/09/2005(UTC)
Posts: 146

Far out all right!! my guess is that u would need a compression tester that can take five readings in a millisecond and than corelate that to each timing point.something to mull over though.
be an innovator, not a imitator
Guest
#4 Posted : Thursday, 1 September 2005 9:07:49 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
i remember reading 7-8 years ago about electro-magnetic valve actuators, they can now program injectors but not the valves (yet?). you could certainly fine tune the engine then... :D

Guest
#5 Posted : Thursday, 1 September 2005 11:33:04 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
A minor point, not really relevant but the most fuel efficient car in the world is 33%, some Toyota. Meaning for every 100 liters of fuel only 33 are used in the combustion process.

Ok now a few points. What laws of physics are you talking about? And b
Guest
#6 Posted : Friday, 2 September 2005 5:20:18 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Thanks very much for your contribution VL_05. You certainly know your theory. I wish I did know as much, although I am slowly learning all the time.

I was never much good at physics at school but I think I do have a certain amount of logic instilled in
Guest
#7 Posted : Friday, 2 September 2005 10:22:56 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
I have extensive knowledge of physics principles (although I'm only 17). Your theory is quite interesting, I think we need to have a chat, you supply theory I'll support with logic! Oh and just to be a pest, there is only one major "support" keeping the E
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.088 seconds.