Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

RigPig Offline
#1 Posted : Friday, 6 October 2017 11:44:35 PM(UTC)
RigPig

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/07/2006(UTC)
Posts: 766
Location: in the shed

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 13 post(s)
How many GTS's actually got warrigal inside the boot compartment?
My Dandenong car didnt and I doubt any Adelaide cars did.

The engineering data lists three choices for the rear compartment interior, unless I'm reading it wrong.
Black 299-9187 or Box Black 599-5285 or Warrigal black 222-6459

Should it be warrigal in the boot?
HK1837 Offline
#2 Posted : Saturday, 7 October 2017 8:02:50 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
That is HT not HK.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
RigPig Offline
#3 Posted : Sunday, 8 October 2017 12:29:08 AM(UTC)
RigPig

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/07/2006(UTC)
Posts: 766
Location: in the shed

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 13 post(s)
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
That is HT not HK.


Thats what Ben gave me so thats all I got.
It dosent mention any specific model but I did notice the dates yeah.

Its all very top secret stuff these engineering documents. Brick wall
Ausjacko Offline
#4 Posted : Sunday, 8 October 2017 7:26:12 AM(UTC)
Ausjacko

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 30/05/2015(UTC)
Posts: 167

Thanks: 50 times
Was thanked: 6 time(s) in 6 post(s)
And it must be mid HT as the date is Jan 1970
HK1837 Offline
#5 Posted : Sunday, 8 October 2017 8:19:14 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
The trouble is the plants always differed from each other, and as soon as you think something is nailed a spanner gets thrown in the works when a car turns up that breaks the mould. Add to this that GMH didn’t make all changes at a Series boundary or even when they say they did (your car for example is prior to the published breakpoint when they changed from Chevrolet engine to McKinnon engine yet it has a McKinnon engine). This is why concours judging of these is always going to be so difficult.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
RigPig Offline
#6 Posted : Monday, 9 October 2017 12:48:16 AM(UTC)
RigPig

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/07/2006(UTC)
Posts: 766
Location: in the shed

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 13 post(s)
I know every plant did their own thing but it would be nice to know the details of the way GMH intended them to be painted.

Hopefull the concours judges dont look too closely at paint finishes because every restored Holden I look at is painted different in almost every area, theres nothing for restorers to follow so thats what you get.

I'm sure the GT Ford guys dont paint their half-million dollar cars wildly different to the next car do they?
Maybe they do.

I'll be replicating most of the details as found on my car but to have the option of doing some areas the way GMH intended would be good.
For example I might do my upper rad support panel in Warrigal, it definately wasnt originaly but the GMH engineering says it should be for GTS so that gives me an option.
Same story with the boot compartment, except its still a mystery.

Wayne
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.027 seconds.