Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

acegts Offline
#1 Posted : Tuesday, 12 October 2010 10:10:56 PM(UTC)
acegts

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 12

I know it must get tiresome but can some one help with a strange ID number on a Holden V8 engine the date casting on the front of the block reads 13e3 and the engine number go's 11VT375### it has 308 cast on the side ????

HQ GTS/4

Edited by user Wednesday, 13 October 2010 6:07:20 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

FNQ HQ GTS/4
Dr Terry Offline
#2 Posted : Tuesday, 12 October 2010 10:38:19 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,015

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 197 time(s) in 180 post(s)
I haven't seen 11VTxxxxxx before, but could it be 11WTxxxxxx ? This would equate to a 1983 WB Statesman engine.

Dr Terry

_________________________________________

When calculating a car restoration budget, be as accurate as you can & then double the final figure. It will be closer to the truth.
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
classic oz wreck Offline
#3 Posted : Wednesday, 13 October 2010 2:09:47 AM(UTC)
classic oz wreck

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 7/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,115

or doc its the old lets add a 11 infront of the number..seen it many times..

going to church makes you no more a christian than standing in a garage makes you a car...

www.classicozwreck.com.au
going to church makes you no more a christian than standing in a garage makes you a car...

www.classicozwreck.com.au
acegts Offline
#4 Posted : Wednesday, 13 October 2010 5:52:16 AM(UTC)
acegts

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 12

quote:
Originally posted by Dr Terry
I haven't seen 11VTxxxxxx before, but could it be 11WTxxxxxx ? This would equate to a 1983 WB Statesman engine.
I was hopeful for a 1973 block, as its for sale at the right price, but it came with a commodore of some description and I know the 11QT prefix is normally statesman the guy is going to take close ups for me, the date stamp is the important one for my application.

FNQ HQ GTS/4

Edited by user Wednesday, 13 October 2010 6:06:55 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

FNQ HQ GTS/4
commodorenut Offline
#5 Posted : Wednesday, 13 October 2010 9:29:04 AM(UTC)
commodorenut

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 2/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 3,135

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 35 time(s) in 33 post(s)
I'd agree with Greg on this one - adding 11 in front makes it look like a WB engine, and can be used to prevent a sus motor from being flagged up at rego time..

Engine number VT375xxx is perfect for that casting date ('83), so I see only 2 possibilities::
1. It was stamped like that to alter it's ID and prevent detection.
2. The slim chance it was a mistake at the engine plant.

How well lined up is the 11? Does it look like it was done by hand?

Cheers,

Mick
_______________________________________________________________

Judge a successful man not on how he treats his peers, but on how he treats those less fortunate.
Cheers,

Mick
_______________________________________________________________

Judge a successful man not on how he treats his peers, but on how he treats those less fortunate.
HK1837 Offline
#6 Posted : Wednesday, 13 October 2010 3:59:06 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,569

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 458 post(s)
Mick, 11WT375xxx is also perfect for 1983 as WB and Commodore numbers are the same. The 11's are always rough looking as they were not done at the same time as the rest of the number. Same as the X on LX and UC 6cyl Toranas.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
acegts Offline
#7 Posted : Wednesday, 13 October 2010 6:20:46 PM(UTC)
acegts

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 12

Ok its starting to look like a WB or commodore blue motor!
I hope to get some good pics in the next few days.
At what stage did Holden start using the 5.0L on the side instead of the 308?
And could the 13E3 be read as 13/may/1973 and 13/may/1983? or have i got it all wrong LOL

FNQ HQ GTS/4
FNQ HQ GTS/4
HK1837 Offline
#8 Posted : Wednesday, 13 October 2010 8:50:18 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,569

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 458 post(s)
From memory 5.0L started around when the engines were changed from 308 to 5.0L ie mid VK. Mick might elaborate a bit on this, or correct me if i'm being too general. 5.0L also dissapeared mid VR when the blocks were machined to be suitable for 5.0L or 5.7/350 applications. I also remember 308 appearing on both sides maybe around the start of VK?
In 1973 the V8's used US coding so 13/5/73 would look like E133.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
acegts Offline
#9 Posted : Wednesday, 13 October 2010 10:48:13 PM(UTC)
acegts

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 12

So 13E3 is definitely 1983 blue motor?
Forgive my ignorance, I'm on a bit of a learning curve at the moment, never really worried about engine numbers and date stamps before, around when did the date casting change from US to AUS style?

Also I really do appreciate the input so far.

FNQ HQ GTS/4

Edited by user Thursday, 14 October 2010 12:19:33 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

FNQ HQ GTS/4
playwme Offline
#10 Posted : Thursday, 14 October 2010 2:51:26 AM(UTC)
playwme

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 4/07/2008(UTC)
Posts: 342

I'm pretty sure the 11WT prefix is specific to WB Statesman. If you're looking for a 73 dated engine then you really need the corresponding engine number for your application. Statesmans HQ-HZ 308 had 11QT as a prefix while all other body styles 308 had QT prefix.

If you're using the motor for a 73 GTS then you need to make sure you have the correct prefix and date code. ie QT prefix and date code E133.

In short, this motor is no good for any '73 application when it comes to it's numbers.
acegts Offline
#11 Posted : Thursday, 14 October 2010 4:00:25 AM(UTC)
acegts

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 12

Yes! I was starting to get that, LOL.
As i indicated previously I was never realty concerned with originality till now hence the learning curve.
The engine I was asking about is a fresh reco from a reliable source (legitimate) at the right $$$$ and we all know the price of engine machine work.
So I may still grab it.
But I have a new found interest in originality and plan to pursue it with hopefully some of your help.

FNQ HQ GTS/4
FNQ HQ GTS/4
HK1837 Offline
#12 Posted : Thursday, 14 October 2010 4:39:40 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,569

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 458 post(s)
I wouldn't get to concerned about finding an "original" engine for the car. Unless it is THE original it is really a fool's game, just get a QT block from around the right time. Trying to find a date coded engine that is not the original is a stupid game in my honest opinion! At the end of the day an 11WT block is as orignal to the car as a QT engine from a HZ. Having said that though, just having a QT prefix in there regardless of it's origins does look better if you are trying to restore it to as close to original as you can. But if the car is to be a semi-modified just use whatever you like.
BTW 11WT should be WB Deville, 12WT is Caprice.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
jim Offline
#13 Posted : Thursday, 14 October 2010 4:48:04 AM(UTC)
jim

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 28/03/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,903

Good Advice Byron,That's exactly what I've been trying to tell people,only "one" engine or "time period"

Jim in Adelaide..
Jim in Adelaide..
acegts Offline
#14 Posted : Thursday, 14 October 2010 6:37:20 PM(UTC)
acegts

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 12

Yes I agree and if my GTS didn't have its original engine (which it has) I would just stick a Chev in it.
The reason I'm chasing this 308 is for a 73 HQ 1 toner I have, also the price is right, but the 1983 date stamp may mean I would have to modify the fuel tank and fit a charcoal canister. yuk


FNQ HQ GTS/4

Edited by user Thursday, 14 October 2010 6:40:03 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

FNQ HQ GTS/4
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.103 seconds.