Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

satanic customs Offline
#1 Posted : Wednesday, 11 May 2011 5:56:34 AM(UTC)
satanic customs

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 177

there was some debate on here recently regarding whether or not HQ's had bolt on body protection strips or not, that HQ in Aust Muscle Car certainly appears to have the bolt on variety

what do others think?
Rhys Offline
#2 Posted : Wednesday, 11 May 2011 6:41:58 AM(UTC)
Rhys

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 397

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I have a HQ Statesman accessory brochure (different to the standard HQ one) and it shows the strips in there, the same as what you're talking about. So yes, definitely a dealer fitted accessory, not a factory thing. About half the original HQ Statesmans you see are fitted with them.
D. A. Barnes Offline
#3 Posted : Monday, 16 May 2011 2:20:18 AM(UTC)
D. A. Barnes

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 202

Those protector strips would the least thing suspect with that car. I had a good read in the newsagents yesterday as I refuse to buy the mag any more as it is rubbish nowadays but I am going off topic. Have you noticed that the car is a late 1972 example yet the owner claims it is a May 1973 car? The paint colour is Baroda mk11 with the old 10 black diamond cloth trim. A 1973 car has the new 30 black and in Devereaux cloth and the paint colour would be Sable. The ID numbers are also for a 1972 car from Adelaide so something quite fishy here to say the least. Anyone who knows HQs would have spotted these anomalies.

On the side strips, my understanding is that if the Premier and LS got them the DeVille would also get them. Other Monaros could be fitted with them but as a dealer job.
Dr Terry Offline
#4 Posted : Tuesday, 17 May 2011 9:34:50 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by D. A. Barnes
Those protector strips would the least thing suspect with that car. I had a good read in the newsagents yesterday as I refuse to buy the mag any more as it is rubbish nowadays but I am going off topic. Have you noticed that the car is a late 1972 example yet the owner claims it is a May 1973 car? The paint colour is Baroda mk11 with the old 10 black diamond cloth trim. A 1973 car has the new 30 black and in Devereaux cloth and the paint colour would be Sable. The ID numbers are also for a 1972 car from Adelaide so something quite fishy here to say the least. Anyone who knows HQs would have spotted these anomalies.


Yes, I would agree, there is not too much 1973 about that HQ. I noticed the aftermarket metric speedo conversion with the yellow lettering & the early chromed recliner mechanisms. About the only thing '73' about it could be the amber front blinker lenses, but as I understand even these were phased into production as early as Nov/Dec 1972. That body ID plate style ceased around Sept of that year.
quote:

On the side strips, my understanding is that if the Premier and LS got them the DeVille would also get them. Other Monaros could be fitted with them but as a dealer job.


AFIAK there were no factory fitted side strips on any model HQ. There were all dealer fitted, in either Nasco & aftermarket style.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.059 seconds.