Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

928S Offline
#1 Posted : Friday, 27 January 2012 3:33:30 AM(UTC)
928S

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 21

Guys haven't seen this conversion done, I would think that it would give the car a nice weight balance, I must admit I haven't been able to find the weights for the Holden red motor, six or eight, I believe the alloytec weighs under 170 kgs, can't see it being heavier than the red motor, it would also sit further back in the chassis which would be good for handling not that the car is a sports car.

I think what would really wake the alloytec up is more compression, I would suggest running it at 12 to 1. This bump in compression may and I stress may by offset grinding the crank. However I am not familiar with the crank except for what I have read. The fact it is a forged steel item with large journals is a good start, tidy up the heads which look pretty fantastic and build a set of custom headers and exhaust. An aftermarket manifold is said to add 30 HP to a standard engine, more on a modified one. Tuning via the blackbox also raises the game, good for up to another 30 HP.

My wife's car has a Gen IV 6.0 running a liquid LPG system which is a fantastic system, great power, tends to be around 5% better than petrol and great economy too. They make a liquid system for the alloytec, the conversion to gas will alloy the 12 to 1 comp ratio. Every point of compression adds about 3% so about 6% gain. In all and I know these changes need to work in harmony together to get a nice gain. However HP in the low 300 range wouldn't be hard to imagine maybe even mid 300s.

I wouldn't do the conversion on basis of outright power but a great and economical cruiser and it is something a bit different, which is part of the appeal. If the engine was lighter than what came out by a decent margin, I think you could crack into the 13 second area which is no slouch for a nice running small capacity N/A engine.
Utility8 Offline
#2 Posted : Friday, 27 January 2012 4:10:34 AM(UTC)
Utility8

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/01/2009(UTC)
Posts: 435

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
It will still be, & sound, like the six cylinder it is though?
Where's the fun in that?
utility8
HK1837 Offline
#3 Posted : Friday, 27 January 2012 6:04:35 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
I'd still stick with an EFI 304. Bolts straight in with a HT-HG 253/308 sump and pickup.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
pete11 Offline
#4 Posted : Friday, 27 January 2012 10:57:16 PM(UTC)
pete11

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 21/11/2011(UTC)
Posts: 26

ive searched for weights of the different engines myself but with no luck.always found the ht g holdens to give a nice ride with the 6 cyl,s.
cloudy Offline
#5 Posted : Saturday, 28 January 2012 7:45:46 PM(UTC)
cloudy

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,047

It would be interesting to see how it would perform even
as a standard unit plus having cheaper 6cyl reg.
cloudy Offline
#6 Posted : Saturday, 28 January 2012 7:55:12 PM(UTC)
cloudy

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,047

If I did the same conversion I would be looking for a High output 3.6, my 07 WM has the 195kw V6 and goes pretty good for a big car with a six, wheels mag 07 puts it at 15.4secs over the 400m .Stick it in a lighter car with the right set up it would be quicker again.
928S Offline
#7 Posted : Sunday, 29 January 2012 1:37:59 AM(UTC)
928S

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 21

Agree on all points cloudy, that 3.6 is a great engine, more powerful than the 3.8 supercharged ecotec, I would use the sidi engine if I wasn't intending to use lpg, however there isn't a decent liquid system for them yet. Remember they start out with 225 kw or 300 HP from factory. The biggest advantage that direct injection has over a high comp LPG system is that no fuel is lost out the tailpipe during the overlap phase.

Also as you say they go quite well in a car that weighs 500 kgs more than a HK, so couple that with most likely a further reduction weight reduction with an alloy V6 versus a cast iron inline 6.

As we already have 3 V8s in the household I don't want or need anymore hence the looking for interesting options.

Cheers
petaus Offline
#8 Posted : Tuesday, 31 January 2012 8:43:23 AM(UTC)
petaus

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/11/2006(UTC)
Posts: 543

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
even just by increasing the rev limiter they make heaps more power, but then the rods start to come out lol
928S Offline
#9 Posted : Tuesday, 31 January 2012 4:27:07 PM(UTC)
928S

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 21

quote:
Originally posted by petaus
even just by increasing the rev limiter they make heaps more power, but then the rods start to come out lol


I had no real idea of the strength of the rods, however as I mentioned in the opening post, offset grinding the crank would require new rods and after working out the options, a suitable aftermarket rod could be found.

I would love to put the heads on a flow bench as I am pretty sure they are stellar heads. They would certainly flow more than any cast iron head ever fitted to a Holden. Just need to maximize that airflow into a suitable package. In the all out attempts with high revs they make over 400 HP. That is like the earlier Porsche GT3 engines and given the bore is smaller than a GT3 that is quite an achievement.

However for a good driving/cruising car which is what i want, the engine needs to be tuned in around where the factory has it now. So I need to trap more air in the cylinders to get the VE up, maybe regrinding the cams is an option? Quicker ramps and a touch more duration.

What I have found with engines I have built is that when you build a great exhaust and then bump the compression, tidy the heads, intake etc, the engine really takes off because you have increased air velocity in the tracts and that gives great throttle response too.

Cheers
Pacman Offline
#10 Posted : Monday, 2 April 2012 6:10:54 AM(UTC)
Pacman

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/06/2011(UTC)
Posts: 65

Interesting concept, how would you go about business in regards to hooking up the wiring to such an old style dash? im considering something tech as opposed to my red 202 for power to weight ratios like yourself.

Im no good with wiring or anything so i would imagine it would be a nightmare, any decisions made? installations and the likes? I am very keen in hearing what direction and action this project takes.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.161 seconds.