Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

BAD WB Offline
#1 Posted : Thursday, 1 October 2009 4:31:44 AM(UTC)
BAD WB

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 13/06/2007(UTC)
Posts: 113

Was told the other day that the vt heads have a different chamber shape to the previous models. Does any one know if this is true, and if so was that the only difference between them?
HQforme Offline
#2 Posted : Thursday, 1 October 2009 8:38:32 AM(UTC)
HQforme

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/06/2007(UTC)
Posts: 582

Sure theyre not just confusing the fact that VT series two changed motors to the LS Chev series? Or were they referring specifically to the last of the Holden heads?
"Silly modern cars"
BAD WB Offline
#3 Posted : Friday, 2 October 2009 5:45:14 AM(UTC)
BAD WB

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 13/06/2007(UTC)
Posts: 113

They said the last of the 5 litres. The vt roller motors.
HK1837 Offline
#4 Posted : Friday, 2 October 2009 6:11:08 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,894

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 554 time(s) in 529 post(s)
Never heard that before, but may be true. The last of the 5.0L was in VSIII too not VT.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
BAD WB Offline
#5 Posted : Friday, 2 October 2009 7:05:12 AM(UTC)
BAD WB

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 13/06/2007(UTC)
Posts: 113

The first VTs came out with 5 liters. the 185, 195s
HK1837 Offline
#6 Posted : Friday, 2 October 2009 7:08:15 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,894

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 554 time(s) in 529 post(s)
That is correct, and 5.7 also with HSVs. But VSIII were still on sale into VX, and werent replaced with VU until sometime into VX. They were still on sale into 2001 but as run out. V8s were all gone by September 2000 though.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
castellan Offline
#7 Posted : Friday, 2 October 2009 10:10:06 PM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,647

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
The 179 KW and 195 KW VT roller cam motor cyl head have 312 casting number and the ute has 019.
and yes it is a smaller chamber.
the 1998 VS series III ute had a 168 KW motor and in 1999 they got the 179 KW roller cam motor. optional 195 KW in early 1999 on the S ute.
Dr Terry Offline
#8 Posted : Friday, 2 October 2009 11:39:24 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,114

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 219 time(s) in 199 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by castellan
The 179 KW and 195 KW VT roller cam motor cyl head have 312 casting number and the ute has 019.
and yes it is a smaller chamber.

This is a bit ambiguous. Which one is smaller, the VT (roller cam) motor or the VN-VS motor. Also why is it just the ute & not the Statemans or Caprices.

What is the full casting number of the VT head, that ends in 312 ?

Dr Terry

If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
HK1837 Offline
#9 Posted : Saturday, 3 October 2009 2:27:32 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,894

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 554 time(s) in 529 post(s)
I thought that was od too, as I thought the VT and VSIII 179kW engines were identical.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Dr Terry Offline
#10 Posted : Saturday, 3 October 2009 3:22:34 AM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,114

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 219 time(s) in 199 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by HK1837
I thought that was od too, as I thought the VT and VSIII 179kW engines were identical.

Its not all VS III which had VT V8s, its only late production VS III.

AFAIK they are near identical also, the only differences are the belt & pulley set-up & perhaps the sump.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
HK1837 Offline
#11 Posted : Saturday, 3 October 2009 4:32:02 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,894

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 554 time(s) in 529 post(s)
Thats why I typed VSIII 179kW, not just VSIII.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
coopers308 Offline
#12 Posted : Sunday, 4 October 2009 10:47:12 PM(UTC)
coopers308

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/07/2008(UTC)
Posts: 36

correct the VT has kind of a love heart shaped chamber and the others dont. I dont have numbers on hand at the moment - i will try and find some hard evidence later.
BAD WB Offline
#13 Posted : Monday, 5 October 2009 12:23:15 AM(UTC)
BAD WB

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 13/06/2007(UTC)
Posts: 113

IS the shape the only difference? or is the size different as well?
coopers308 Offline
#14 Posted : Monday, 5 October 2009 12:51:46 AM(UTC)
coopers308

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/07/2008(UTC)
Posts: 36

The cc difference is minimal. 63/64cc for VN-VS. Heart shape VT 60/61cc. Someone maybe able to be more accurate than that- but its not a huge difference either way.
castellan Offline
#15 Posted : Monday, 5 October 2009 11:45:25 PM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,647

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
I think it may to do with the emission laws. i think Jan 1999 it got stricter. yes statesman and Utes are the same. i cant remember where i got these details its what i have jotted down years ago it may be wrong.
VN -22FO
VR -305
VS -6L5
VS -24F5
VS -019 FROM 1999 UTE & STATESMAN
VT -312
VN -92600019
VN -92060757 GROUP A
castellan Offline
#16 Posted : Monday, 5 October 2009 11:58:55 PM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,647

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Holdens. Alan Jones said they lifted the compression from 8.4:1 to 8.8:1 reshaping the chamber around the intake valve to improve airflow,tumble & burn. to meet ADR 37/01 of the VT roller motor.
HK1837 Offline
#17 Posted : Tuesday, 6 October 2009 1:13:10 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,894

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 554 time(s) in 529 post(s)
Castellan, most of those are cast dates not casting numbers. Did the VSIII 179kW/195kW engines also have to comply with that ADR? If so the heads should be the same as VT.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
castellan Offline
#18 Posted : Tuesday, 6 October 2009 10:09:02 PM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,647

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
I think you are right, with as to some being the casting dates HK1837.

From what i remember is that on 1/1/1999 all had to comply with ADR37/01 as ADR37/01 starts on 1/1/1997 with models first produced on that date or after that date. with all new vehicles required to comply by 1/1/99. so i think the VT does comply with it but only the ute & statesman had to in 1999 so that is why it got the roller sequential motor.

The 195 KW motor has a different exhaust valve. so it may have a different number.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.098 seconds.