I have given this some more thought and have concluded that the 15837 figure is also wrong.
The reason I believed the 8317 figure to be wrong was the when I was building my car the wreckers were full of HKs but no where near as many HT and HG. The HT and G though would be more wrecked by individuals who wanted to put all the gear into their Vans at the time, but still I believed the proportion of HKs was way to high in the wreckers for there to be 8317 HKs and 14437 HTs. Hence the belief that Norms figure was right.
However I re thought this for the following reasons:
1) HK was on sale for 11 months and HT for 13 months.
2) We know that when a personal car comes out that there is high demand at first and then tapers off, rego figures for Monaro in 2002 and 2003 are good examples, 3245 and 2210. These figures are from Holden.
3) We know that Sydney numbered their cars, they made Approximately 470 GTS327s, 4400 GTS, 2500 Monaro, in HT they made 210 350s, 2400 GTS (V8 and 6) and not enough data on Monaro at the end of production.
So as you can see Sydney made almost twice as many HKs as HTs. There were times when the 327 and 350 was not available, so these should not be used, but the GTS figure is testimant to the fact that there should be far more HKs than HT.
4) As an organiser at 4 of the last 5 nationals the largest participanting models were HK and HQ, I organised the parking spaces for them and know this as a fact. In fact there are about as many HKs as HT and G combined. HQ is high due to the large number of sedans in there.
So from this data, I would suggest the figure for HK should be more like 20,000 HK Monaro. Or the HT figure is too high. Either way I would suggest we (Norm, Ben and myself) are wrong on some figures.
Warren
(note: I am using some old Monaro register data, but it all goes to the last months of production)
Edited by user Monday, 1 March 2010 7:52:24 AM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified