Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

bullitljv8 Offline
#1 Posted : Saturday, 13 February 2010 9:06:13 PM(UTC)
bullitljv8

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 8/11/2008(UTC)
Posts: 401

just reading the latest monaro magic book by norm darwin the hk monaro production numbers that are listed on page 17 read

based on hk coupe bodies made that account for 7.87% below ben stewart and warren turnball estimate

monaro 161 = 1,473 made

monaro 186 = 4027 made

monaro gts 186s = 8317 made

monaro gts 307 = 628 made

monaro gts 327 = 1192 made

grand total monaros made = 15,637

wow 628 gts 307 made didnt relise the production numbers for the gts 307 were so low but we are always learning about these cars
hqgts Offline
#2 Posted : Saturday, 13 February 2010 9:27:15 PM(UTC)
hqgts

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/05/2008(UTC)
Posts: 417

i would have thought logically that a digit was missing and it would read 6280...

when you compare the numbers to the 186 , 186S and 327 I would have thought a 307 s desireability as a saleable car would fall about the 6000 mark..

but i do not know

Edited by user Saturday, 13 February 2010 9:29:12 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Dr Terry Offline
#3 Posted : Saturday, 13 February 2010 9:54:49 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,114

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 218 time(s) in 198 post(s)
I agree. I would have thought that there were more GTS 307s built than GTS 327s.

Ive personally owned 3 of them & on the Sydney used car market in the late 70s/early 80s they were far more prevalent than GTS 327s. Many were converted to look-a-like GTS 327s.

It might have been a long bow to draw to accept that just because 7.87% of HKs were 307s then it follows that 7.87% of Monaro GTSs would therefore be 307s. I would have thought that a 307 V8 would be a more common option (percentage-wise) in a Monaro GTS than in say a Kingswood sedan or a Belmont van.

I think it equally erroneous to accept that 7.87% of Monaros had a 161 engine. Surely these would be more common (percentage-wise) in Belmonts, especially utes & vans. Anecdotally most of the HK 307s that Ive ever seen would have been Broughams, GTS & Premiers, a 307 Kingswood was not common & a 307 Belmont was ultra-rare.

BTW, those figures dont mention base Monaros with the 307 option, I knew of at least 2 of these.

Dr Terry

_______________________________________
There are 3 types of people in the world.
1. Those who can count.
2. Those who cant.
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
D. A. Barnes Offline
#4 Posted : Saturday, 13 February 2010 10:19:43 PM(UTC)
D. A. Barnes

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 202

Well said Dr Terry. Your book is a lot more accurate that this latest Monaro Mayhem by Norm Darwin. The HQ Monaro numbers breakdown on p97 is a mess but for some strange reason the number quoted for 1972 production HQ GTS 350 is spot on according to Ben Stewart who gave me the build numbers for GTS 350s each year of HQ manufacture. The 32% of GTS 350s with automatics is also way wrong as it is 51%.

The HK Monaro numbers will also be way off the mark as has been identified by Dr Terry. I also had an HK GTS with 307 manual in Burgundy Maroon for that matter. Maybe the number quoted is for 307 manual cars?

The big blue on p97 is in relation to the options in HQ. The codes are just so wrong it isnt funny. A 253 is L32 for Gods sake. And just how many M22s were there behind a 308 V8? The book should have been proof read by Dr Terry and Ben Stewart in my view.
HK1837 Offline
#5 Posted : Sunday, 14 February 2010 2:35:49 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,891

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 554 time(s) in 529 post(s)
Doc, I also noticed the lack of 307 Monaro. I know of two as well.

DA, that burgundy Maroon L30 M21 GTS you had - did it have 18Y trim and have HG tail-lights and backend added at some stage?

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
hqgts Offline
#6 Posted : Sunday, 14 February 2010 3:12:59 AM(UTC)
hqgts

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/05/2008(UTC)
Posts: 417

Byron, way down here there are 2 factory 307 cars in the one family... 1 has been owned for over 20 years... originally 307 manual car...silver mink/ black interior now painted metallic blue with a 350 / top loader / 9 inch in it... the other owned for about 8 years... warwick yellow/ parchment interior 307 glide car still with original running gear..

so they are definately around

Edited by user Sunday, 14 February 2010 3:14:44 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

HK1837 Offline
#7 Posted : Sunday, 14 February 2010 5:03:15 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,891

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 554 time(s) in 529 post(s)
I meant 307 Monaro, not GTS.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
hqgts Offline
#8 Posted : Sunday, 14 February 2010 5:07:12 AM(UTC)
hqgts

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/05/2008(UTC)
Posts: 417

doh... i have a kingswood 307 glide in the shed.... drum brake front end.... now thats scary to pull up in the wet..
bullitljv8 Offline
#9 Posted : Sunday, 14 February 2010 5:26:20 AM(UTC)
bullitljv8

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 8/11/2008(UTC)
Posts: 401

well guys those numbers are from ben stewart and warren turnball so i dont know whats going on and how many 307 4 speeds were produced as they seem to be a lot harder to find than a 327
Warren Turnbull Offline
#10 Posted : Sunday, 14 February 2010 5:27:19 AM(UTC)
Warren Turnbull

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 10/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,362

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 28 post(s)
What Norm based the figures of 161 and 307 on is the ratio across all HK. He has the % of 307s made and just put that against the GTS figure. The problem arrises that it is an estimate, as Terry said, one could argue that there would be a higher % of 307s in Premier and GTS compared to Kingswood and Belmont. A good example is 307 Panel vans, only 80 made, much less thaqn the 7.87%.

He has the 350 numbers right as he has the info direct from Holden on those, so Holden publications are wrong on the auto, go figure. But Holden claimed a total of 8317 HK Monaros for many years. It was Norm Darwin who always claimed the 15837 in his Holden since 1917.

When I suggested this figure was right when we wrote the book Ben disagreed for many years, claiming the Holden figure right. It was not util the Monaro register had enough cars from Sydney and Adelaide that we knew these two plants made more than they 8317. It was then believed by Ben that the 8317 is GTS and the 5500 was calculated from there. I beleive the 8317 figure to be 186S GTS, about 3000 Monaro and 1500 307 GTS. But these are opinion, not fact. The only fact on the HK Monaro is 666 327s were registered in 1968, Holden quote a figure of 8317 and Norm Darwin has shipping manifest for 15837. So you guys work out the truth. Once again quoting numbers from GM-H can be a problem

No L32 in HQ. L33 is low comp 253.


Warren

Edited by user Sunday, 14 February 2010 5:58:31 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Warren Turnbull Offline
#11 Posted : Monday, 1 March 2010 4:00:14 AM(UTC)
Warren Turnbull

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 10/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,362

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 28 post(s)
I have given this some more thought and have concluded that the 15837 figure is also wrong.

The reason I believed the 8317 figure to be wrong was the when I was building my car the wreckers were full of HKs but no where near as many HT and HG. The HT and G though would be more wrecked by individuals who wanted to put all the gear into their Vans at the time, but still I believed the proportion of HKs was way to high in the wreckers for there to be 8317 HKs and 14437 HTs. Hence the belief that Norms figure was right.

However I re thought this for the following reasons:

1) HK was on sale for 11 months and HT for 13 months.

2) We know that when a personal car comes out that there is high demand at first and then tapers off, rego figures for Monaro in 2002 and 2003 are good examples, 3245 and 2210. These figures are from Holden.

3) We know that Sydney numbered their cars, they made Approximately 470 GTS327s, 4400 GTS, 2500 Monaro, in HT they made 210 350s, 2400 GTS (V8 and 6) and not enough data on Monaro at the end of production.

So as you can see Sydney made almost twice as many HKs as HTs. There were times when the 327 and 350 was not available, so these should not be used, but the GTS figure is testimant to the fact that there should be far more HKs than HT.

4) As an organiser at 4 of the last 5 nationals the largest participanting models were HK and HQ, I organised the parking spaces for them and know this as a fact. In fact there are about as many HKs as HT and G combined. HQ is high due to the large number of sedans in there.

So from this data, I would suggest the figure for HK should be more like 20,000 HK Monaro. Or the HT figure is too high. Either way I would suggest we (Norm, Ben and myself) are wrong on some figures.

Warren

(note: I am using some old Monaro register data, but it all goes to the last months of production)

Edited by user Monday, 1 March 2010 7:52:24 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.055 seconds.