Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

2 Pages12>
bigindian66 Offline
#1 Posted : Thursday, 5 May 2011 6:02:55 AM(UTC)
bigindian66

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 27/02/2008(UTC)
Posts: 58

I have a HJ GTS coupe that I will be selling shortly. I'm trying to put a value on it ,because I have 2 people who have always said, If you sell it I want it.( one of these guys offered low $30k, but I feel it may be worth a little more. I need to give these people an option but of course I would like to get a good price for it as I'm only selling it to finance a new project. ( It will be hard to let it go)I have owned for 6-7 years.
Details as follows:
Warm 308, T400, 3.55 LSD 10 Bolt, 3000 converter. Car is mechanically very good. Car has rare factory steel sunroof. No rust , no dents, excellent paint, original GTS wheels, Black golf ball interior with red stripe. I have just reconditioned the internals of 2 rear windows and front left window.
I am just fitting carpet and new door trims by Winner products as old ones had speakers in the doors. Quality re-chromed correct rear bumper. Front left guard is not original, and does not have the painted black strip on the sill. Colour is a slightly different shade of Jamaica Lime.
I do not currenty have the ADR plate,I am trying to track it down at the moment. It has been registered in SA as a HQ since 1994- I have proof of this. In SA we do not have any roadworthy checks, this was common years ago to just swap plates when a car was defected. Car has been verified with the assistance of Byron and Ben Stewart as genuine. I have a verification letter from Holdens as well.
I will take some photos as soon as I put the door trims in.
Of course, if anyone wants to discuss a sale, please give me a call.
My mobile is 0419 818779
Cheers, Rick

adam PERTH Offline
#2 Posted : Thursday, 5 May 2011 6:57:35 AM(UTC)
adam PERTH

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 3/08/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,902

PM cannon, he sold his recently... No ADR tag knocks it back $5k in my eyes.
Old holdens brought on the spot, quick decision, cash paid.
bigindian66 Offline
#3 Posted : Thursday, 5 May 2011 8:23:44 AM(UTC)
bigindian66

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 27/02/2008(UTC)
Posts: 58

Adam, yes, without the ADR tag it is of lesser value, however, it is what it is, its not a HQ LS or HX LE, despite not having the plate. The engine number, chassis number and Vin number ( the VIN number is not listed on the ADR plate)match what was built in Pagewood in December 1974.The ADR plate only lists the chassis number- which is of course stamped on the chassis and is clearly visible.
I understand the market has dipped, and you will only get what the market is willing to pay, but what do you think it could be worth with or without the ADR plate?
Thanks

HK1837 Offline
#4 Posted : Thursday, 5 May 2011 3:42:11 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
Rick

Very hard to judge. The eonly cars that seem to be pulling good money are untouched original cars of any kind. Projects etc are depressed. Toranas are stupid at the moment too. Missing ADR plate is a killer too.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
cloudy Offline
#5 Posted : Thursday, 5 May 2011 6:41:16 PM(UTC)
cloudy

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,047

If I was was offered 30k for a car with no ADR plate i would be taking it.
Warren Turnbull Offline
#6 Posted : Thursday, 5 May 2011 7:16:24 PM(UTC)
Warren Turnbull

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 10/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,357

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 28 time(s) in 27 post(s)
What Byron and Ben would have given you is the same as the Holden varification letter, or did they actually inspect the car? If they did and gave you a letter to say they had and comfirmed this or that, then this would hold more weight.

Missing the compliance plate is going to give some drama to the new owner, as the Police are checking cars like that when they come for re rego. If that car has to go to a transport department, they are going to call the police and the car can be impounded until the full identification is confirmed. This can take some time. (If Ben has inspected the car then this would reduce the time)

So for that reason alone, I would agree with Cloudy on the 30k.

Warren
bigindian66 Offline
#7 Posted : Thursday, 5 May 2011 7:33:35 PM(UTC)
bigindian66

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 27/02/2008(UTC)
Posts: 58

Thanks guys, I appreciate your input. I was finding it hard to judge, so thought it best to post my question here to get some some feedback from people who are in the know.
monaro maniac Offline
#8 Posted : Wednesday, 11 May 2011 6:55:25 AM(UTC)
monaro maniac

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/01/2011(UTC)
Posts: 17

Any photos yet? My favourite car in my favourite colour. I thought the cops could find out very quickly if its stolen by the firewall number if the complience plate is missing, is this wrong?
cain Offline
#9 Posted : Wednesday, 11 May 2011 8:51:40 AM(UTC)
cain

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/05/2011(UTC)
Posts: 2

Rick
If The buyer is aware that it has HQ tags and is not what it appears i would be running to the bank with the 30k . Has it ever been over the pits ?? You might not be aware but it could be stolen and you and the purchaser might possibly loose . The offer you have seems to be from someone that possibly hasnt looked at the car or done checks on it . Good luck but i would be looking for a car that you could truly verify the history of
Regards Cain
cloudy Offline
#10 Posted : Wednesday, 11 May 2011 7:06:04 PM(UTC)
cloudy

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,047

If it was reg as a HQ and a new owner tries to reg as a HJ I think motor reg is going to be asking a few questions.
You will find it will have to go to Regency Park for a numbers check and to see if its possible to get replacement plates from the police/RTA , I knew a person years ago that did up a coupe with no plates and then went reg it ,It was a painfull process and eventually they got reg but this was about 18 years ago and things may be harder now.
bigindian66 Offline
#11 Posted : Thursday, 12 May 2011 10:05:04 PM(UTC)
bigindian66

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 27/02/2008(UTC)
Posts: 58

The potential buyer knows that the correct plate is missing. In SA we do not have any inspections.When i first bought the car i was aware it was registered as a HQ. The car was fitted HQ plates.
The car has been registered this way since at least 1994, and is still currently registered this way. I have a rego sticker to prove this)
When I first bought the car I thought it a bit odd that a HQ could have everything that a HJ coupe, eg interior, correct seatbelts and mounting points, had so checked with the Rego department. All checked out OK, they were only interested in the engine number, they do not record VIN numbers.
After buying the car I went over everything which alerted me to the fact that it was in fact a HJ. i was fortunate that it still had the original chassis number and the engine number and firewall stamp.
The engine number on the certificate is still the same as the number as the original HJ engine number. ( the engine has been decked, so the engine number is not clearly legible)
I tried to track previous owners through our Reg department but no go.
I am very close to finding the guy who may have swapped the plates.
At a swap meet recently I met some people that new the car in the early 90's and are helping me track the owner who painted it back then.
As you can imagine, there is probably only one green HJ GTS coupe with a factory sunroof in SA.
Back then it was common place that if a vehicle was defected, you just swapped the plates and to keep it legal all you had to do was notify Rego of an engine number change- again we do not have inspections in SA unless you get defected and are told to front up to Regency Park. So effectively the car could be sold as a HQ ( as the plates state)
I have to say, it is still going to be hard to sell, as it is a fantastic car to drive ( has quality suspension including rear swaybar) and all the better with a sunroof. The only reason I'm looking at selling it as I'm buying a car from the US while the dollar is good and their market is down. looking forward to that big block , 4 speed!!


bigindian66 Offline
#12 Posted : Thursday, 12 May 2011 10:31:15 PM(UTC)
bigindian66

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 27/02/2008(UTC)
Posts: 58

Just to cover your point Cloudy, car is legally registered as a HQ, and has HQ plates fitted, so you would not go to rego with a HQ asking to swap to HJ, car will be sold as a HQ.
If the original plates could be found the vehicle could be fitted with these plates then presented to Rego as an unregistered vehicle. After passing inspection the vehicle would be allocated its correct VIN ( which has never been recorded).
So as you can see there is nothing dodgy here. If I thought there was anything dodgy I certainly would have not put this up in a public forum. Also another point I did not mention, i have a friend who was in the police force and i discussed my situation with him a few years back, his response was the same as the rego department, If it is registered with rego and correct set of compliance plates and engine number is recorded there is nothing more to check out - all is OK, it is just a HQ with some HJ bits on it.
cloudy Offline
#13 Posted : Thursday, 12 May 2011 11:25:14 PM(UTC)
cloudy

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,047

I am aware of the lack of inspections as such as I live in SA, I see that you purchased the car with the HQ plates on it originally . Did they have the HJ`s orig reg number available for you to check? or does it have the HJ`S reg and only a plate swap?
I personally would have been concerned about buying a HJ with HQ ID .
I hope you get the money your chasing as you are selling a HQ not a HJ coupe by the plates.

Edited by user Thursday, 12 May 2011 11:34:56 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

bigindian66 Offline
#14 Posted : Friday, 13 May 2011 2:06:04 AM(UTC)
bigindian66

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 27/02/2008(UTC)
Posts: 58

Cloudy, I do not know the original number plate. When I bought the car I knew it was regoed as a HQ. The ADR/Vin/Body tag all match.
I did all of the usual checks.You could find the original rego number and owner by referencing the engine number through the RTA.
I tried this and even wrote letters to the seeking info based on freedom of information act.However this service invloves lawyers and was informed they won't do this for free!!
I bought the car from an employee of Holdens who drove it to work and back for years. Everything was legitimate. At the end of the day I guess, you could call it HQ modified to be a HJ GTS replica(in every way) with factory steel sunroof. I guess from a value point of view, what would it cost to buy a HQ coupe, restore the body,fit a GTS front, fit a strong driveline,fit a steel sunroof and fit a quality interior.
Cloudy, being that you live in SA, you would have seen , as I have, many cars over the years where the first letter does not match the year of the car, eg 73/74 HQ's with "R" series plates etc.
They are now harder to pick as you can now buy "R" series plates, but years ago you could not.
Anyway thanks for your comments
jim Offline
#15 Posted : Friday, 13 May 2011 2:41:00 AM(UTC)
jim

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 28/03/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,903

Rick,at the end of the day its a re-tagged car no matter how you put it.It is worth what some one will pay for it,at least as you've said,your being up front with the info.Sometime this seems to cause more problems than its worth!!I still think its the best way though..lol
I am not a collector and therefore the tags wouldn't bother me as long as you have it rego'ed.
Collectors can make their own minds up.All the above comments are opinions on a very"wide"subject
that is bound to be interesting.The main question is "again a re-tagged" car?Do HQ'S go for more money?
As long as you are honest ,I think youv'e done the right thing and so would most people.Of course
value??,you and everyone else will always pay more for the correct parts/cars.
P.S...To me its still a monaro coupe none the less...Just sell it to the highest bidder.
Jim in Adelaide..
cloudy Offline
#16 Posted : Friday, 13 May 2011 3:07:17 AM(UTC)
cloudy

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,047

Rick I agree with the R series thing unless you get ones to suit the car ie:RHK-068 etc. we have a couple in our car club, good luck with the sale :^)
wbute Offline
#17 Posted : Friday, 13 May 2011 5:11:52 AM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
I might be barking up the wrong tree here but..... a HQ modified to HJ is not just front panels. We are talking major dash modifications and the scuttle panel below the windscreen is also different. It has to be one or the other and really has nothing to do with rego papers? That is what the value will be based on? It cant be a mixture of both, the tags and chassis number are the cars identity.

Edited by user Friday, 13 May 2011 5:14:14 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

bigindian66 Offline
#18 Posted : Friday, 13 May 2011 5:24:25 AM(UTC)
bigindian66

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 27/02/2008(UTC)
Posts: 58

WB ute, yep you are 100% right, but I guarantee 100% it is a HJ for all of the reasons you mentioned.As previously mentioned on the thread , the car still wears the original chassis rails that were on it when it left Pagewood December 1974. The only things that are HQ are a few bits of stamped aluminium.
Hopefully I can track down the person who has the correct plates hanging as souvenirs on his garage wall!! These plates will have my chassis numbers on them , so they are no good on another car.
wbute Offline
#19 Posted : Friday, 13 May 2011 5:46:46 AM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Hope you can too! That would be a find to put a smile on your face.
bullitljv8 Offline
#20 Posted : Friday, 13 May 2011 6:12:18 AM(UTC)
bullitljv8

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 8/11/2008(UTC)
Posts: 401

hey rick i live in s.a and have had lots of dealings with regency as you know its illegal to take plates of any car doesnt matter that they have been on there for a while or you didnt do it the fact is they dont belong to the car you have end of story.... my friend went through this exact situation a while ago with an lj gtr torana it had lc gtr plates on it he took it to regency to have it inspected to try and get it sorted his car was impounded by the police for weeks.... he got it back minus the lc plates as they come up with its not stolen but your plates dont belong to this vehicle so he was left with a replica lj gtr torana so just be aware of what could happen should you take it to regency....
Users browsing this topic
Guest (4)
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.238 seconds.