quote:
Originally posted by HKTG Parts Recovery
It amazes me the amount of 'secret' Holden literature out there that only seems to of been accessed by two or three regular forum posters on here. I think it's time this so called literature that 'gurus' are referencing, to shoot us blokes down that live, drive and own the said vehicles, need to post the proof for all to see.
Greetings (again!), Nothing 'secret' about what some interested persons have in connection to their cars. If it's proof you want then proof you shall have. You have proved to us that you have very little in the way of factual GMH material in connection with these cars. I find that a little unusual as I would have imagined someone with your knowledge to have a large library of reference material to call on from time to time when the brain gets foggy. Nobody can have a perfect memory for things like this so we need books to call on. Dr Terry obviously has as do several other people on here.
HG is my pet and as a result of collecting I have also got some HK and HT stuff. On HG though, here is what I have to refer to and use.
HG owners manuals (three different ones)
HG ordering procedure (two different ones)
HG selling manual
HG features book
HG parts catalogue (and the 46 pages of ammendment bulletins)
HG shop manual supplement (4 pages)
HG broadcast sheets (44 different types of cars)
HG dealer service bulletins
HG dealer service letters
HG accessories bulletins
HG parts instruction drawings (accessories)
and also
HT engineering technical specifications
HK engineering technical specifications
All this stuff was found by google and on ebay from blokes such as Daryl (Spy v Spy), James (Mr ACDELCO), Doug (monaro man), Darryl (Cool McCool) and others. I have been buying for many years but regret missing out on a book of instruction drawings that must have had hundreds in it.
I do actually own and drive a vehicle I have all this stuff for. I look at other vehicles as well.
Presenting correct factual information is not shooting you down as you imply. If you give information that is not correct there is sure to be someone to fix it. As for posting the proof as you request in the form of pictures of it there is every chance people will dispute it as being correct because they have seen a car that does not comply. You can't win either way.
The window winder handle is an example of what is supposed to be the case in cars. But how many original cars would be around that have never had a handle removed and replaced? In this situation we must rely on factory documentation to go back to what was supposed to be correct in the day.
I have the greatest respect for Dr Terry and as such my tag is in honour of him - git means guru in training in case you hadn't worked that out.
JS