Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

castellan Offline
#1 Posted : Sunday, 17 May 2015 12:49:28 AM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
On the subject of RTS and VB Commodore vs VC commodore would be a good start to get into and them move on to others.

Now I love the handling of V8 VB Commodores, they were magic in the hands of one who could drive well.

It's the spring rates that are of interest and sway bars and alignment setup.

I will forget about the 6 cyl as they were to gutless.

VB V8 gets a 23mm front bar and a 20mm rear.
VC V8 gets a 24mm front and 16mm rear but aircon one gets 19mm rear.
then the rear springs were lineal but the VC were progressive I think.
Front springs are the same I think.
I don't know what the wheel alignment difference were.

I want to see if there is anyone interested in such things.

Most people think that lowering a car is where it's all at and putting big wheels on it, that's just rubbish.

A few little tweaks can make a much better handling car and it does not cost big money.
commodorenut Offline
#2 Posted : Monday, 18 May 2015 4:17:28 AM(UTC)
commodorenut

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 2/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 3,135

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 35 time(s) in 33 post(s)
Very interested - and have been for over 25 years. Thankfully in my younger days it was at the end of the jacked-up rear end era, and it went the other way....All my mates were about how low can you go, and how wide can the tyres be. I used to joke that I could gain 300m on them while they straddled a speed hump at a crawl..

Best "factory" combination I found in my VH some 20 years ago was the heavier sway bars off later cars (26mm VL front, 19mm VR/VS V8 wagon rear) and later model (VN/VP) V6 FE2 springs. Shocks were the old Monroe GT-Gas. They worked well with the setup.
Along with judicious use of poly bushes (keep rubber in the diff ones, but the rest poly) and it became a fantastic, predictable handling car that would take a "set" into a corner, and hold it right through with security.

I've never had a 1st or 2nd generation commodore since, that handled as well. It drove better than my Brock does today with rebuilt plus-pack suspension & bilsteins in it.

Also found 205/55/16 tyres on 16x7" rims gripped better (cornering) than 215 or 225/50/16 on the early commodores too.
There's a reason the Group As (VL HDT and Walky) wore that size on 16x7 rims.

With the alignment, you are limited in what you can achieve, so I found it best to go for as much caster as possible.
I had the adjustable K-mac top hats that gave more camber (and unlike the factory tops, allowed independent camber/caster), as well as the offset tension rod bushes that pulled them forward. Both made a huge difference to steering feel & preciseness - as you'd expect from the additional caster. Camber was somewhere between 0.75-1.00 degrees negative on each front, and the tyres wore very evenly.
Couldn't tell you what the toe was.

Springs went from linear to progressive (and back) over the various models. VLs were softer than VK for example, due to a spring change one way (can't remember which way). As a general rule, rears were usually always progressive though, and most of the fronts were normally linear.

They used to take the rear swaybars off cop cars to gain more rear grip & reduce the low-speed/too much power in a corner oversteering tendencies, but when driven well, you can overcome this, and gain the benefits of the rear sway bar as well.
Cheers,

Mick
_______________________________________________________________

Judge a successful man not on how he treats his peers, but on how he treats those less fortunate.
HGV8 Offline
#3 Posted : Monday, 18 May 2015 6:50:51 AM(UTC)
HGV8

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 420

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 9 post(s)
I had a VC S/LE 308 auto back in the 80's. What sold me on the commodore back then was it's great handling and performance. It was a superb drivers car for it's time, even in standard trim. Only modification I did was 2"inch lowered springs front and back which was more about it's stance then any handling advantage over standard.
j.williams
johnperth Offline
#4 Posted : Monday, 18 May 2015 11:37:46 AM(UTC)
johnperth

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,991

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
I used to drive stock xf-xd falcons and vk commy wagons in the country and found the fords wouls sit much more nicely/securely on gravel or dirt roads while the vk got very floaty, but the commy handled much better on the bitumen.
main problem with commodore was that the front had to be realigned much more often after the rough roads while ford just was stronger and never needed looking at. different to the early fords with mcphersion struts that fell apart all the time.
Dr Terry Offline
#5 Posted : Tuesday, 19 May 2015 3:29:12 AM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by johnperth
I used to drive stock xf-xd falcons and vk commy wagons in the country and found the fords wouls sit much more nicely/securely on gravel or dirt roads while the vk got very floaty, but the commy handled much better on the bitumen.
main problem with commodore was that the front had to be realigned much more often after the rough roads while ford just was stronger and never needed looking at. different to the early fords with mcphersion struts that fell apart all the time.

While I agree with you on the country road handling ability of say an XD/XE Falcon being superior to a VB-VH Commodore, I can't agree on the Falcon's alignment not requiring constant attention.

We had a wheel aligner set-up from the late 70s to the late 80s & we found on Sydney roads Falcons would not retain their wheel alignment settings. The lower inner pivot bolts (camber pins) would forever creep leading the camber & toe need constant re-aligning, no matter how tight they were torqued.

Commodores were far better in that respect but needed new front strut inserts regularly.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
johnperth Offline
#6 Posted : Tuesday, 19 May 2015 11:27:09 AM(UTC)
johnperth

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,991

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Terry I probably should qualify my note with the proviso that we used to replace cars at around 40,000k or 3 years so probably never got to the stage of needing replacement or adjustment .but the fords did go longer btween servicing the commies were always in for front ends.

Edited by user Tuesday, 19 May 2015 11:59:25 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Dr Terry Offline
#7 Posted : Tuesday, 19 May 2015 4:46:10 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
Maybe Sydney's crappy suburban roads (potholes etc.) are worse than country roads in this regard.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
wbute Offline
#8 Posted : Tuesday, 19 May 2015 6:03:25 PM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Sydney roads worse than country roads? Not a chance.
commodorenut Offline
#9 Posted : Tuesday, 19 May 2015 6:54:37 PM(UTC)
commodorenut

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 2/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 3,135

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 35 time(s) in 33 post(s)
Main roads & motorways around Sydney - yes, there's no contest - they are almost always better than country roads by a long way.
But many Sydneysiders rarely use the (tolled) motorways, and often seek out back-street rat-runs to avoid the gridlocked traffic on major arterial roads (that are well maintained).

But when it comes to suburban Sydney streets & back roads in semi-rural areas on the fringe of Sydney? I've driven many country roads, often dirt, that are in far better condition than council-maintained (or lack of) minor roads in suburban Sydney & it's outskirts.

Busses & trucks rip them to shreds, especially after a torrential downpour, and cash-strapped councils takes weeks, if not months to fix the gaping pot-holes that open up ever too quickly.

In the last few weeks I've helped 3 stranded people (all elderly) change blown tyres after hitting local potholes big enough to crack alloy OEM wheels, on what would be considered urban feeder roads (approx 30-40 cars/minute - counting only 1 direction).

Cheers,

Mick
_______________________________________________________________

Judge a successful man not on how he treats his peers, but on how he treats those less fortunate.
wbute Offline
#10 Posted : Tuesday, 19 May 2015 7:21:02 PM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Sydney roads are fantastic, be it main roads or the dreaded isolated back streets of Glenfield.
The back streets in my home town are still dirt. We live on a property 20km out of town. My wife cut the side wall out of the rear tyre on our then family car. She hit the windrow left by the grader and rolled it. Then climbed out the passengers window and walked across the paddock to find our neighbours for help. She was twenty weeks pregnant.
However go for a quick run from somewhere like Cobar to Louth and let me know how many of the bad roads in outback Sydney compare?
I am sorry but I am sick of hearing about bad Sydney roads. It's just a case of believing your own bull$$it. Full stop.
commodorenut Offline
#11 Posted : Tuesday, 19 May 2015 8:05:12 PM(UTC)
commodorenut

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 2/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 3,135

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 35 time(s) in 33 post(s)
Ahh, the sign of a baseless argument, belittle the other people who are posting by descending into abusive expletives.

Unless you're riding inside the dash-cam, you wouldn't have a clue how bad the roads are that people like Terry & I are talking about.


By the way - last time Glenfield had isolated back streets was 35 years ago. There's 5000+ new homes there that have gone up in the last decade, as well as a massive railway expansion, but I guess you would have to know all about that since you're beligerently abusing others "beliefs" so openly /rolleyes....
Cheers,

Mick
_______________________________________________________________

Judge a successful man not on how he treats his peers, but on how he treats those less fortunate.
Dr Terry Offline
#12 Posted : Tuesday, 19 May 2015 9:53:59 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
I'm not going buy into a silly mine's worse than yours argument.

The basic discussion was about how, in my experience, Falcons of that era didn't retain their alignment settings, whereas the Commodores did. I still stand by that comment after re-aligning many 100s of the buggers, no matter how good or bad the roads are perceived to be.

Early Commodores are hard on front shocks (strut inserts) while Falcons are not. The Falcons of that era felt better on the open road at speed, compared to their Commodores counterparts, even if the Commodore handled more precisely on smooth bitumen.

Should we start a discussion on how bad Falcon ball joints are ? XK-XG uppers & EA-FG lowers ? Perhaps not ?

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
gm5735 Offline
#13 Posted : Tuesday, 19 May 2015 10:57:31 PM(UTC)
gm5735

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/04/2014(UTC)
Posts: 768
Man
Location: Victoria

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 47 post(s)
On the contrary Terry, I think it's a great idea.
The Ford forum seems to be mostly inhabited by Holden people, used by about 3 Ford people, and moves with the speed of a herd of rampaging earthworms.
A good stir up is just what it needs.
wbute Offline
#14 Posted : Wednesday, 20 May 2015 2:04:04 AM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,124

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Sorry, I will rephrase with less offensive language of the sensitive political correct style.
NSW is a big state. The worst roads are not in Sydney. People tend to focus too much on their day to day surroundings and need to experience wider horizons to have a balanced perspective.

Edited by user Wednesday, 20 May 2015 2:06:07 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

castellan Offline
#15 Posted : Wednesday, 20 May 2015 2:37:40 AM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by commodorenut
Very interested - and have been for over 25 years. Thankfully in my younger days it was at the end of the jacked-up rear end era, and it went the other way....All my mates were about how low can you go, and how wide can the tyres be. I used to joke that I could gain 300m on them while they straddled a speed hump at a crawl..

Best "factory" combination I found in my VH some 20 years ago was the heavier sway bars off later cars (26mm VL front, 19mm VR/VS V8 wagon rear) and later model (VN/VP) V6 FE2 springs. Shocks were the old Monroe GT-Gas. They worked well with the setup.
Along with judicious use of poly bushes (keep rubber in the diff ones, but the rest poly) and it became a fantastic, predictable handling car that would take a "set" into a corner, and hold it right through with security.

I've never had a 1st or 2nd generation commodore since, that handled as well. It drove better than my Brock does today with rebuilt plus-pack suspension & bilsteins in it.

Also found 205/55/16 tyres on 16x7" rims gripped better (cornering) than 215 or 225/50/16 on the early commodores too.
There's a reason the Group As (VL HDT and Walky) wore that size on 16x7 rims.

With the alignment, you are limited in what you can achieve, so I found it best to go for as much caster as possible.
I had the adjustable K-mac top hats that gave more camber (and unlike the factory tops, allowed independent camber/caster), as well as the offset tension rod bushes that pulled them forward. Both made a huge difference to steering feel & preciseness - as you'd expect from the additional caster. Camber was somewhere between 0.75-1.00 degrees negative on each front, and the tyres wore very evenly.
Couldn't tell you what the toe was.

Springs went from linear to progressive (and back) over the various models. VLs were softer than VK for example, due to a spring change one way (can't remember which way). As a general rule, rears were usually always progressive though, and most of the fronts were normally linear.

They used to take the rear swaybars off cop cars to gain more rear grip & reduce the low-speed/too much power in a corner oversteering tendencies, but when driven well, you can overcome this, and gain the benefits of the rear sway bar as well.
If I could get all the information on what Peter Hannenberger did to the VC, what I need I think is the alignment spec, the balance of the springs and bars can be worked out.

A mate has a HZ kingswood and he did have a VB Commodore years ago and he can drive well, he was a mad man in that VB of his when they were new, now he is old like me, but he complains that his HZ does not handle like one should, I say it's the clown who did the alignment that is the problem, as they mainly do a 'fix' spec nowadays that destroys the handling, making it more of a HQ understeering tank.

When I got my new VS V6 I had to put 1.6 neg camber on it so it would not understeer and the VS V8 1.4 neg camber.
I liked the 225/50/16, 16x7'5 ? wheel tyre best Brimstone RE71 back in the day magic and you could drive as hard as you want on dirt roads with 16's but 17's you have to watch out or you keep ripping out side walls on sharp rocks.
I Have nothing against 205/15/16 on VB-L or VN-S.
commodorenut Offline
#16 Posted : Wednesday, 20 May 2015 3:20:02 AM(UTC)
commodorenut

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 2/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 3,135

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 35 time(s) in 33 post(s)
I totally agree with alignment. At the local tyre place (I refuse to let them align it) the young guy was questioning why they kept all these "useless shims" - which I recognised as HQ-WB (among others). Luckily the more senior fellow was able to set him straight - but to my amazement he then asked why they didn't throw them out, as you "never see an old Holden anymore".....

Funny you mention tyres & VN-S - I still have a VS V8 that I bought when it was 3 years old. It's standard size was 215/60/16 on a 6.5" rim, but it handled best on 225/50/16 tyres on 16x7" Walkinshaw rims. I think the additional weight of the 2nd generation body makes the difference compared to the 205/225 on the early cars. I also ran it on the 17" VS Senator wheels & tyres of the day (HSV used 235/45/17 Bridgestones) and whilst the ride was firmer, it skipped around on corners, rather than staying put & holding line.
There's obviously differences in sidewall deflection & other tyre-to-tyre variations causing most of it.

Where the VB-VL was much more consistent when cornering on 205 than 225, and felt more secure, the 225s on the VS felt just as secure (I have never tried 205 on the VS V8). I'd hate to see how poorly some of these 19" wheels & tyres perform - especially when they're usually fitted to a young kid's car with some cheap ding-dong-bang brand tyre of dubious quality.

The RE71 was a great tyre in it's day. I also like the G-Grid from the 90s too. Both hung on like nobody's business.
Cheers,

Mick
_______________________________________________________________

Judge a successful man not on how he treats his peers, but on how he treats those less fortunate.
castellan Offline
#17 Posted : Wednesday, 20 May 2015 3:40:28 AM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by Dr Terry
quote:
Originally posted by johnperth
I used to drive stock xf-xd falcons and vk commy wagons in the country and found the fords wouls sit much more nicely/securely on gravel or dirt roads while the vk got very floaty, but the commy handled much better on the bitumen.
main problem with commodore was that the front had to be realigned much more often after the rough roads while ford just was stronger and never needed looking at. different to the early fords with mcphersion struts that fell apart all the time.

While I agree with you on the country road handling ability of say an XD/XE Falcon being superior to a VB-VH Commodore, I can't agree on the Falcon's alignment not requiring constant attention.

We had a wheel aligner set-up from the late 70s to the late 80s & we found on Sydney roads Falcons would not retain their wheel alignment settings. The lower inner pivot bolts (camber pins) would forever creep leading the camber & toe need constant re-aligning, no matter how tight they were torqued.

Commodores were far better in that respect but needed new front strut inserts regularly.

Dr Terry
I would buy a new car around a year to about nearly every 2 years 100,000km up on them and never once had to get the wheel alignment done once I set it up.
On the commodores I never had to but only because you have to, as the struts around 40,000km I replace them and the rears as they are rubbish by then and even had Pedders red not last that front and back.

I never did a ball joints in the XG ute, but a mate with his XG was going through them at around 30,000km.
My steering box was rubbish and replaced from new and I was for ever tightening up the front axel nuts at 30,000km as you can feel the difference it makes over 180km/h as they just steer so much better when tight at high speed over long distances, or it makes driving a tiring.
Can't say the XG was any better on dirt than my VS commodores really but you have to keep an eye on the rear of the IRS VU-Z utes at times, when the shocks get worn they are uncontrollable just total hopeless junk even on the bitumen roads it goes so spas'o.
My first taste of a VP commodore IRS was a shocker the shocks were buggered the worst car I have ever driven the next was the VT SS rear end just total rubbish.
The VU-Z utes are a bit different to the sedan so Peter Brock said to me when test driving the new VU utes when they came out, I was pointing to what the VX had done to the IRS and if I could do that with the ute, and he said no, do not do it, as they are different to the sedan in the set up.
castellan Offline
#18 Posted : Wednesday, 20 May 2015 4:12:15 AM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by commodorenut
I totally agree with alignment. At the local tyre place (I refuse to let them align it) the young guy was questioning why they kept all these "useless shims" - which I recognised as HQ-WB (among others). Luckily the more senior fellow was able to set him straight - but to my amazement he then asked why they didn't throw them out, as you "never see an old Holden anymore".....

Funny you mention tyres & VN-S - I still have a VS V8 that I bought when it was 3 years old. It's standard size was 215/60/16 on a 6.5" rim, but it handled best on 225/50/16 tyres on 16x7" Walkinshaw rims. I think the additional weight of the 2nd generation body makes the difference compared to the 205/225 on the early cars. I also ran it on the 17" VS Senator wheels & tyres of the day (HSV used 235/45/17 Bridgestones) and whilst the ride was firmer, it skipped around on corners, rather than staying put & holding line.
There's obviously differences in sidewall deflection & other tyre-to-tyre variations causing most of it.

Where the VB-VL was much more consistent when cornering on 205 than 225, and felt more secure, the 225s on the VS felt just as secure (I have never tried 205 on the VS V8). I'd hate to see how poorly some of these 19" wheels & tyres perform - especially when they're usually fitted to a young kid's car with some cheap ding-dong-bang brand tyre of dubious quality.

The RE71 was a great tyre in it's day. I also like the G-Grid from the 90s too. Both hung on like nobody's business.
Yep RE71 and such were the ants pants when tyres became just so much better than in years gone by.
I use to buy new tires and get rid of them before they were half worn out because the rubber started to go hard and would not hang on as well.
I have a ding-dong cheap rubbish tyres on the rear of my car now and they are rubbish from hell just hopeless junk Mazzizi.

With a tyre I see that the weight that it supports can make a big difference in what to go for, as in one type of tyre maybe great for one car but not so much another.
It's all very interesting to have a handle into the complex design and compounds of tyres, I would love to do that stuff for a job.

I had a tyre problem that nearly shook the hell out of the car over 140 KM/H I thought the gear box was going to blow up.
My Dad was in hospital fighting for his life, so I took off for the 2 1/2 HR drive, so the next day I had to buy new rear tyres and this tyre dude idiot said just how good the Mazzizi were and he only had good reports from them.
Some of them cheap rubbish can be ok but you need higher pressures with them than a good quality tyre.
detective Offline
#19 Posted : Wednesday, 20 May 2015 4:28:50 AM(UTC)
detective

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 307

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 11 time(s) in 11 post(s)
...castellan mentioned the ol' mate with the HZ, and i'll never forget when in around 1979 and about 9.30 at night how a plain, pale blue HZ sedan was flung around a big roundabout in Gladstone Park (Vic) with what i can only believe had to be a racing driver at the wheel...

...it was phenomenal to see, and in all truth there would be no real way the old HQ 350 of mine could've done the same...and i threw that car around a fair bit back in the day...
castellan Offline
#20 Posted : Wednesday, 20 May 2015 5:59:39 AM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by detective
...castellan mentioned the ol' mate with the HZ, and i'll never forget when in around 1979 and about 9.30 at night how a plain, pale blue HZ sedan was flung around a big roundabout in Gladstone Park (Vic) with what i can only believe had to be a racing driver at the wheel...

...it was phenomenal to see, and in all truth there would be no real way the old HQ 350 of mine could've done the same...and i threw that car around a fair bit back in the day...
When the man who created our RTS Holdens was talking about it all, he was going on about just that what you have put forward, it's all about control and said that the VB commodore was better than what he could do with the HZ.
Them VB commodores could be driven around an oval or anything with total spot on ability as it does what you want it to do.

With the HZ Peter Hannanberger who's baby was RTS, he drove a worked 308 and demonstrated what a car must do or should be able to do, he was driving around the Lang Lang track at 180km/h and just hooked the wheel and spun the car around 360 degrees and let go of the wheel and she corrected it's self, then he did that again 9 more times up to 210km/h so it's all a lot to do about geometry.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.127 seconds.