Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

4 Pages123>»
ghg308 Offline
#1 Posted : Saturday, 19 June 2010 7:02:20 AM(UTC)
ghg308

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/04/2009(UTC)
Posts: 99

Hi Guys
I know its been taked to death about but when the new repro monaro shells come in i wanted to know if they will come as a bog standard six model ie no humped fuel tank etc or are they talking of making to a customers order?
just thought someone here may know?
also isnt illegal to put old badges on a new car or is it just a case of a massive rust repair section?
cheers
HK1837 Offline
#2 Posted : Saturday, 19 June 2010 8:40:16 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,719

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
If you get a chance research the differences in the Camaro and Mustang sheels from the originals and see how different they are. Then you'll see it doesn't matter that any new Monaro sheel isn't true to original, so I imagine they'd make them as one size fits all. If they were all replica 1837 manual shells then you could do what you wanted with them. Since they'll probably be obviously different from the originals no-one will care if a hump or two is on them.
I doubt any of these will legally ever be able to be registered as a 1969-1971 Monaro, so any of them will probably be restricted to club rego or display cars. They won't have chassis numbers either.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
80569K Offline
#3 Posted : Saturday, 19 June 2010 10:11:35 PM(UTC)
80569K

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/08/2008(UTC)
Posts: 916

Thanks: 2 times
Just a thought, would these cars qualify as kit cars?

All States have Individually Constructed Vehicle regulations covering kit cars. It seems the manufacturer of the kit car provides the VIN, and the finished car will have to comply with a blend whatever ADR's apply to the new body build date and the date of the 'donor' chassis and other mechanical bit's.

Will the deal be similar to this one, check this out, scroll down to "Conformances".

http://www.auskitcar.com/Index2.html

Doing Monaro's the way they do 1977 Nissans and using an original car as a donor seems to suggest that you would be able to call the finished car a rebodied 1969 model etc. Don't chuck that rusty Kingy away just yet.

Maybe I'm reading this wrong, would be interested to hear what you guy's think.
Absinth Offline
#4 Posted : Saturday, 19 June 2010 10:22:09 PM(UTC)
Absinth

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/09/2007(UTC)
Posts: 431

quote:
Originally posted by HK1837
I doubt any of these will legally ever be able to be registered as a 1969-1971 Monaro, so any of them will probably be restricted to club rego or display cars. They won't have chassis numbers either.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?


Why would these not be allowed when other vehicles are?

I personally know a guy in NSW who purchased a 1942 Willys ww2 MB jeep that had been sitting in a farmers paddock for decades. The body and chassis were rusted beyond repair.

A complete Phillipine reproduction body and chassis was purchased to restore the vehicle. The chassis number on a MB jeep is stamped on a metal plate that is riveted to the front chassis rail (also available reproduction)and was long gone. The original engine, gearbox, front and rear diffs and other useable parts were fitted to the repro body and chassis and the vehicle in now fully registered in NSW as a 1942 Willys jeep.

A good friend here in Qld got a badly rusted out 1942 ww2 Willys MBT trailer and has restored it using a Phillipine made reproduction trailer tub and chassis and it to is now fully registered as a 1942 Willys trailer.

I also know of a 1928 Chevrolet sedan pulled from a paddock, at least 60% of the body was restored by hand fabricating new panels and a complete new chassis was hand fabricated using measurements from what was left of the original chassis. This car is on club rego in Qld but could be fully registered if the owner wanted.
HK1837 Offline
#5 Posted : Sunday, 20 June 2010 1:05:39 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,719

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
Anything pre 1949 falls into street rod catagory in NSW as far as I know:

A street rod is a vehicle that has been modified for safe road use and that:
has a body and frame that were built before 1949, or,
is a replica of a vehicle the body and frame of which were built before 1949.
I think with the new repro shells the vehicles will have to be registered as 2010/2011 or later vehicles. I think they can be made into individually constructed vehicles, see attached cut and paste from NSW Light Vehicle Modification guidelines - I made the relevant bid BOLD:

What if I want to build my own vehicle?
Vehicles built on specially constructed floorpan or chassis structures are referred to as Individually Constructed Vehicles
(ICVs). Some extensively modified production vehicles are also classified as individually constructed vehicles. These
vehicles must comply with current design and safety standards as well as meeting recognised standards for strength and
controllability.
A vehicle will be classified as an individually constructed vehicle if it is:
A vehicle with a specially constructed chassis (non production vehicle) or a manufactured replica chassis..
A vehicle where the chassis has been widened or narrowed (either in places or along the whole length of the chassis).
A vehicle with a production chassis which does not retain at least one of the original structural crossmembers in the same place for that chassis.
A vehicle where the arrangement of the engine and driveline is substantially changed eg: engine moved from front to rear or to a mid mounted position. Also, where the vehicle is changed from front wheel to rear wheel drive.
A vehicle with monocoque construction, where the subframe structure has undergone significant structural change such as removal and replacement of subframes with structures of a different design or modifications to inner mudguard panels, if this involves relocation or modification of the subframe rails.
Persons contemplating building an individually constructed vehicle are advised to seek the assistance of an RTA recognised engineering signatory prior to commencing, and during the course of, the project.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
jim Offline
#6 Posted : Sunday, 20 June 2010 2:07:56 AM(UTC)
jim

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 28/03/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,903

Run a holden chassis..ie: the same as the parenti(corvette kit car)....done.They have to register it,as they have them.People that
own real monaros wont like this,niether should they,but thats life!

Jim in Adelaide...WTB CENTER LINE AUTO DRAGS 15X7 UPTO 8.5 WIDE.
Jim in Adelaide..
HK1837 Offline
#7 Posted : Sunday, 20 June 2010 2:30:58 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,719

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
Trouble is HK-HG have the chassis number on the firewall!

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
jim Offline
#8 Posted : Sunday, 20 June 2010 3:01:28 AM(UTC)
jim

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 28/03/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,903

No-one is going to build monaro shells,with the amount of money
it would take to tool up, without approval of register prior to
building.The shells themselves may have numbers on from production.
They could also use exsisting chassis as they are a 2010 car anyway.
many people may choose to go fuel injected/turbo..etc.I would think
they will answer all the rego questions prior to spending big$$$,s
I would.(especially after the american incident's)
On the brighter side if youv'e got a wreck you can now fit these
bodies as a spare part!...lol.

Jim in Adelaide...WTB CENTER LINE AUTO DRAGS 15X7 UPTO 8.5 WIDE.
Jim in Adelaide..
cloudy Offline
#9 Posted : Sunday, 20 June 2010 3:01:37 AM(UTC)
cloudy

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,047

Not really a problem many a person would have already cut and shut firewall numbers or even a whole firewall, If these are made by hook or by crook they will get on the road, Even if the RTA put a 2010 ID tag on it if it meets what they want its all green light.
If I bought one I would go full modern mechanics V6 or V8 Holden engine with computers the whole box and dice,
I would have one of these over any old rusted shell with tags and so would many others.Infact if these shells took off old rusted , damaged shells on ebay would be almost worthless.
80569K Offline
#10 Posted : Sunday, 20 June 2010 3:01:50 AM(UTC)
80569K

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/08/2008(UTC)
Posts: 916

Thanks: 2 times
I think there will be a clear distinction between a genuine Monaro and one built up using these bodies and panels. Manufacturing techniques have changed radically since the late 60's, so hopefully as others have previously said, "you can pick the lines".

Cutting a complete firewall out of a wreck and putting it into one these new shells won't make any difference, it would be a pointless exercise if it is obvious what the shell is, and anyway honest people won't need it because the shell will have to have it's own VIN as it's identifier.

I don't reckon tags will come into play either, you would have to have too many kangaroo's in the top paddock to think they would mean anything on a car like that.

So really body stamps and tags should be irrelevant because they won't be needed to register these cars and don't even apply to them.
we wreck 81837s only Offline
#11 Posted : Sunday, 20 June 2010 3:18:59 AM(UTC)
we wreck 81837s only

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 4/03/2008(UTC)
Posts: 2,151

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
no one will ever build a shell, so dont even get into discussion about it. it took brookvale in the USA 20 yrs to get a 1932 ford repro body happening and to get it right, and thats with a population of 280million and the 32 ford being the most restored/modified/hot rodded vehicle in history, so it made some kind of sense to do it. what have we got here that warrants it??
we have not many people, and not much demand, and when you do it, a pack of whinging whineing rednecks that will say its crap anyways. get realistic fella's, as much as i would love to see it happen, it never will

"Reputations are made and broken as soon as you enter or leave my shed.."
we wreck 81837s only Offline
#12 Posted : Sunday, 20 June 2010 3:22:45 AM(UTC)
we wreck 81837s only

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 4/03/2008(UTC)
Posts: 2,151

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
no one will ever build a shell, so dont even get into discussion about it. it took brookvale in the USA 20 yrs to get a 1932 ford repro body happening and to get it right, and thats with a population of 280million and the 32 ford being the most restored/modified/hot rodded vehicle in history, so it made some kind of sense to do it. what have we got here that warrants it??
we have not many people, and not much demand, and when you do it, a pack of whinging whineing rednecks that will say its crap anyways. get realistic fella's, as much as i would love to see it happen, it never will

"Reputations are made and broken as soon as you enter or leave my shed.."
cloudy Offline
#13 Posted : Sunday, 20 June 2010 4:51:04 AM(UTC)
cloudy

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,047

never say never , even if it never happens its still worth a discusion to throw things around , ideas , opinions its what its all about . All it takes is a s***e load of money from some billionaire who has ran out of ideas what to spend his/her money on, The yanks made new Elenors out of old cars so anything is possible The rod boys do it all the time.
Its all good fun .
we wreck 81837s only Offline
#14 Posted : Sunday, 20 June 2010 6:31:00 AM(UTC)
we wreck 81837s only

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 4/03/2008(UTC)
Posts: 2,151

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
never happen.
talk bout the americans making a elenor copys, well that company is now broke, and it started from a guy that was a multi millionaire, and a polation with 280 million, reaching out now to nearly 300 i think.
once again, never happen

"Reputations are made and broken as soon as you enter or leave my shed.."
cloudy Offline
#15 Posted : Sunday, 20 June 2010 7:05:06 AM(UTC)
cloudy

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,047

The population size means nothing ,300 million and lets say 100 of them ordered a shell of whatever and 300 ozzies ordered a shell of whatever the ozzies would have the larger sales with less population . The idea of a shell would be good to all who wanted them except people who have a rust bucket they were trying to sell as nobody would want them anymore.
They will make enough rust repair sections to almost make a car anyhow so they wont need to make shells people can almost make their own in the future.
we wreck 81837s only Offline
#16 Posted : Sunday, 20 June 2010 7:24:07 AM(UTC)
we wreck 81837s only

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 4/03/2008(UTC)
Posts: 2,151

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
fair enough then, but we will never see a repro full body shell for any car in this country, regardless of it being HK, EH XW XY LC-J whatever. those figures you state make sense in theory, but not likely to be thae same in reality

"Reputations are made and broken as soon as you enter or leave my shed.."
HK1837 Offline
#17 Posted : Sunday, 20 June 2010 8:09:06 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,719

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
I kinda agree with Frank. I seriously doubt we'll ever see a repro body shell, and if we did I very much doubt it would work well with existing stuff. I do reckon we'll see repro panel parts of a shell, but I'm still waiting to see the quality.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Warren Turnbull Offline
#18 Posted : Sunday, 20 June 2010 5:51:24 PM(UTC)
Warren Turnbull

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 10/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,357

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 28 time(s) in 27 post(s)
I was at the Qld Monaro club the other night when one of the on sellers came to give a progress report on these shells plus other items that they have manufactured.

They are currently negotiating to have them identified as a spare part and therefore acceptable for registration. I am not sure of all the legalities, but they seem to think it is possible.

If it is, then it will allow a lot of people that want an HK Monaro to own one. If the person wants to make a custom Monaro then one of these shells would be ideal, as once it is modified the tags mean nothing anyway, they only tell you what the car was before you started modifying it.

If you cannot register one, then you could buy one and use its panels to repair yours, ie used its turret, quarters, sills and floors to replace yours, leaving your firewall and A pillars. You could unpick their's and then put on your car. This would be quite legal if you do them one at a time. You could also do this to an HT or HG.

If you are thinking of buying one and making a Monaro without a donor you will need to find all the door and quarter harware, chrome work and seats. The rest can be obtained from a sedan.

If limited to club rego in the states that have their rules derived from the hot rod rules, like Queensland dose, then heaps will do this. Many HK Monaro owners are quite happy with limited rego. When you start looking at how much you can use it, and if you join a club that has lots of outings, every Friday and Saturday night, Saturday and Sunday runs etc.

As for them being able to do it, they have manufactured bonnets, for which there are planty around, so why not the shells.

The interesting part is the fact that the chassis number is in the body shell, so if some one manufactured EH shells then there would be no problem. But if they manufactured EH subframes they could not be used, even though a genuine replacment EH subframe probably did not have a number stamped into it as it could alsobe used on an EJ. The same would apply to FE and FC. It is HD to HG that have the chahssis number not stamped into the body not the chassis. Silly isn't it.

The final word will be are they a Monaro?

Most people will accept them as being a Monaro, some of the purists may not, but if majority rules then I would say yes, as most people modify Monaros rather than restore to original. So the next step will be, can they join a monaro club and enter the nationals. They are alreaady listed as being elligable to enter the nationals so there is your answer to that.

If I had a dead shell here, I would be buying one and using either "repair mine" or register it on club rego option.

Warren
cloudy Offline
#19 Posted : Sunday, 20 June 2010 8:08:42 PM(UTC)
cloudy

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,047

never say never!
80569K Offline
#20 Posted : Sunday, 20 June 2010 8:31:40 PM(UTC)
80569K

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/08/2008(UTC)
Posts: 916

Thanks: 2 times
Still can't see why they would not be a kit car, the rules are already in place to allow it. Plenty of "Replicars" around, Cobra's, GT40's, '67 Mustang's & Camaro's etc etc etc. A new Monaro bodyshell when assembled should still be a kit car, able to be fully registered. It would have it's own VIN and comply with whatever ADR's apply to a 2010 body and 1968-71 mechanicals.

I would build one like Cloudy, and apart from the suspension (which I would be looking around for alternatives) and some trim etc mine would be a completely modern car.

Maybe the builders of these new shells need to make one that has a VZ or VE floorpan incorporated into it.



Edited by user Sunday, 20 June 2010 8:33:01 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
4 Pages123>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.087 seconds.