Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.
2 Pages12>
HK Brougham high back seats
Options Go to last post Go to first unread
Previous Topic Next Topic
HGV8 Offline
#1 Posted : Sunday, 23 June 2013 9:52:28 AM(UTC)
HGV8

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 420

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 9 post(s)
This Hk Brougham has high back front and rear seats. I thought it was only HT that got them. Is this HK an original or bitza? Maybe HT seats?
http://www.gumtree.com.a...m-hk/1020586027?mpch=ads

Edited by user Sunday, 23 June 2013 9:59:44 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

j.williams
Back to top
castellan Offline
#2 Posted : Sunday, 23 June 2013 10:28:52 PM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
I think it's right for the bro HK. did not see that it was the HG type of high backed seats at all. as this one has low front seats in it.
Back to top
HGV8 Offline
#3 Posted : Sunday, 23 June 2013 10:40:09 PM(UTC)
HGV8

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 420

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 9 post(s)
I thought HK got low back, HT High back and HG back to low back front seat? This HK has high back seats as on HT. Maybe very late HK's got high back?
j.williams
Back to top
mph61 Offline
#4 Posted : Monday, 24 June 2013 2:08:37 AM(UTC)
mph61

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 12/10/2011(UTC)
Posts: 34
The seats are from a HT Brougham but it has HK door trims
Back to top
castellan Offline
#5 Posted : Monday, 24 June 2013 11:36:50 PM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
I thought the HT bro got high front seats. they look like HK low. same hight as the premier were.
Back to top
HGV8 Offline
#6 Posted : Tuesday, 25 June 2013 7:37:21 AM(UTC)
HGV8

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 420

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 9 post(s)
Yes your right mph61, thanks. Checked out a few pics of Broughams and they are HT Bro seats
j.williams
Back to top
git Offline
#7 Posted : Tuesday, 25 June 2013 10:15:04 PM(UTC)
git

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/10/2010(UTC)
Posts: 157
quote:
Originally posted by HGV8
This Hk Brougham has high back front and rear seats. I thought it was only HT that got them. Is this HK an original or bitza? Maybe HT seats?
http://www.gumtree.com.a...m-hk/1020586027?mpch=ads


Greetings, This car is an HK with HT seating installed. HK was blonde ivory and HT/G was sandalwood. The two 18 trims are slightly different in colour but very different in material design/pattern. This car is an 1162-18M trim car.
look out, the guru is coming through...
Back to top
castellan Offline
#8 Posted : Tuesday, 25 June 2013 11:11:12 PM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Only the HG got the high front seats ?
Back to top
Dr Terry Offline
#9 Posted : Wednesday, 26 June 2013 12:13:20 AM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by castellan
Only the HG got the high front seats ?

The front seats in that HK are the "high back' type. It's not immediately obvious but the front-on shot shows them best.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
Back to top
HGV8 Offline
#10 Posted : Wednesday, 26 June 2013 4:10:43 AM(UTC)
HGV8

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 420

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 9 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by castellan
Only the HG got the high front seats ?

Castellan, as far as I know only the HT got high front seat. Read somewhere customers complained about rear visibility so reverted to low front seat for the HG.
j.williams
Back to top
castellan Offline
#11 Posted : Thursday, 4 July 2013 8:06:15 PM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
So that's why i always had little respect for the brougham and though my HG premier was better than the big rear bro.
So the rear seat in the HG bro is much sort of like the HK prem with 5 buttons with lines running vertically like and for the 'B' in the emblem standing for brougham and different material design, the prem must get a 'P' emblem.
The HT bro gets 6 buttons and 4 horizontal pillows.
The HG BRO gets 2 buttons and 4 square pillows somthing like HT prem ?
I never remember seeing a HT brougham inside back in them days if i did i would of maybe had more respect for them with high seats and all
I always thought of them as just big arse premiers.
With my dad owning a 1971 LTD i never gave them much notice back then.
Back to top
HGV8 Offline
#12 Posted : Thursday, 4 July 2013 10:00:44 PM(UTC)
HGV8

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 420

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 9 post(s)
True Castellan, Broughams weren't popular but things have changed in recent years. Holden failed back then as Bro's have the same interior space as the Premier but the Fairlane had a longer wheelbase giving more rear seat leg room. With the Brougham Holden just extended the boot. They rectified this with the HQ Statesman building them with the longer wheel base. I didn't like the Bro either but appreciate them more these days.
j.williams
Back to top
Warren Turnbull Offline
#13 Posted : Friday, 5 July 2013 3:55:16 AM(UTC)
Warren Turnbull

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 10/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,357

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 28 time(s) in 27 post(s)
The other thing the Statesman rectified was the number of luxury levels.

The Fairlane was available in two levels, stretch Fairmont and super luxury, whilst Brougham was only available in super luxury. Would be interesting to see the sales figures of the Fairlane and Fairlane 500 compared to Brougham.

Also Statesman and Stateman DeVille, Statesman Deville being Brougham replacement and Statesman being stretch Premier.

Warren
Back to top
castellan Offline
#14 Posted : Friday, 5 July 2013 4:38:42 AM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,641

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by HGV8
True Castellan, Broughams weren't popular but things have changed in recent years. Holden failed back then as Bro's have the same interior space as the Premier but the Fairlane had a longer wheelbase giving more rear seat leg room. With the Brougham Holden just extended the boot. They rectified this with the HQ Statesman building them with the longer wheel base. I didn't like the Bro either but appreciate them more these days.
I love them Broughams now HT would be the Go for me.
When you sit in the back of the HK-T-G Premier or bro they are great there is something about them that you don't get with HQ and modern cars. and the chrome ! and the way the doors shut.
Back to top
HK1837 Offline
#15 Posted : Friday, 5 July 2013 5:28:17 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
I thought most would want a HK Brougham being the only one with a Chev engine.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Back to top
HGV8 Offline
#16 Posted : Friday, 5 July 2013 8:04:23 PM(UTC)
HGV8

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 420

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 9 post(s)
HT/G Brougham if I had a choice. The 308 had heaps more grunt then the 307 as standard.
j.williams
Back to top
Dr Terry Offline
#17 Posted : Friday, 5 July 2013 11:04:35 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
Yes, I agree. I think that the HG 308 & the 3-Speed Tri-Matic was a better car to drive than the 2 earlier versions. Not just because of the extra HP (it wasn't that much extra in real life) but the extra drive ratio.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
Back to top
HK1837 Offline
#18 Posted : Friday, 5 July 2013 11:25:05 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by HGV8
HT/G Brougham if I had a choice. The 308 had heaps more grunt then the 307 as standard.


As standard true, 308 was pretty much optimised, you have to do internal work to them to liven them up, other than a better exhaust of course. 307 was pretty well choked. With the addition of a 4BBL and Quadrajet off a 327 the 307 is a far better engine though, especially if afforded a better exhaust too.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Back to top
HGV8 Offline
#19 Posted : Saturday, 6 July 2013 2:56:27 AM(UTC)
HGV8

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 420

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 9 post(s)
From memory the 307 had 210hp and the 308 had 240hp? Yes I agree about trimatic compared to powergide. Its also surprising how much extra power can be gained with a 253 with a quadrajet and better flowing exhaust. Really livens them up.

Edited by user Saturday, 6 July 2013 2:58:28 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

j.williams
Back to top
HK1837 Offline
#20 Posted : Saturday, 6 July 2013 3:20:04 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
I think that is right. Plenty of stories from the day though of people sticking 327 inlet, carb and exhaust onto HK 307 manual GTS and it was basically as quick as a 327, not much between them. 308 was a bit luckier in HT and HG than the poor old 307 in HK and HT as the 308 could be had with a twin exhaust, although not on Brougham!
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Back to top
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.088 seconds.