Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

2 Pages12>
RigPig Offline
#1 Posted : Sunday, 14 August 2016 8:11:48 PM(UTC)
RigPig

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/07/2006(UTC)
Posts: 766
Location: in the shed

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 13 post(s)
Why are 327 exhaust systems different to 350 HT/G exhausts?
Where is the big difference?
July 1972 publication showing different exhausts and different part numbers.


Also this is a GMH new old stock system purchased decades ago aparently for a HK 327.
Notice the straight through mufflers are not like the offset ones drawn in the parts manual.
Interested to know what the concourse gurus think of it.



Wayne
detective Offline
#2 Posted : Monday, 15 August 2016 8:32:52 AM(UTC)
detective

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 307

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 11 time(s) in 11 post(s)
There may have been a change from a more baffled resonator to the popular "straight through" type as evidenced by the centre inlet and outlet on the latter style. This may also have been to do with local manufacture of the muffler rather than these resonators/pipes possibly being imported along with the engines ?

...interestingly, the list also shows that 253 and 308 with dual exhaust had the same part number for the (quad) tips as the 327/350.

Edited by user Monday, 15 August 2016 8:41:17 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

RigPig Offline
#3 Posted : Monday, 15 August 2016 9:11:24 PM(UTC)
RigPig

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/07/2006(UTC)
Posts: 766
Location: in the shed

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 13 post(s)
Originally Posted by: detective Go to Quoted Post

...interestingly, the list also shows that 253 and 308 with dual exhaust had the same part number for the (quad) tips as the 327/350.


I guess if you ordered a twin system for your 308 or 253 you're only option for tail pipes are these.


Also shows the HK 307 was never optioned with a twin exhaust, I supose thats right.
RigPig Offline
#4 Posted : Monday, 15 August 2016 9:17:49 PM(UTC)
RigPig

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/07/2006(UTC)
Posts: 766
Location: in the shed

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 13 post(s)
That dosent explain why even in 1972 a HK 327 exhaust front and rear sections are different to a HT/G 350 exhaust front and rear sections.
I would have thought by 1972 there would have just been one exhaust available for KTG with Chevs but obviously not.
Must have something to do with either the handbrake cable or clutch actuation or the subframe extension arms.
gm5735 Offline
#5 Posted : Wednesday, 17 August 2016 12:34:22 PM(UTC)
gm5735

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/04/2014(UTC)
Posts: 768
Man
Location: Victoria

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 47 post(s)
The whole exhaust system concept for HK was lifted from the Camaro, in particular the transverse 2 in 2 out rear muffler. The Camaro used offset resonators, which may be part of the reason for the offset resonators on HK. (We didn't, however, get the '69 Camaro chambered exhaust option, which is a pity!)

All HK327 used the offset resonators, with a slight difference in the front pipes between type 1 and type 2 to account for the small difference in exhaust manifolds. The resonators are splayed outwards and, as you've noted, provide clearance to the gearbox crossmember, allowing it to be removed with the exhaust in place.
Its likely that the straight resonators for HT and HG 350 were possible as the gearbox crossmember can be removed and slid off the subframe extension rails without disturbing the exhaust system.

There have been a few examples of period resonators and mufflers which appear identical to the NASCO parts but have Lukey identification stamps so it appears likely that Lukey made the original parts. The internal gas passages and baffling for the original rear muffler are quite complicated, not what you'd expect, and not accurately copied in any of the reproduction seen to date, which is why they just don't sound the same as they used to. The original was actually cross flow, and not two separate chambers within the muffler.
RigPig Offline
#6 Posted : Wednesday, 17 August 2016 10:34:12 PM(UTC)
RigPig

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/07/2006(UTC)
Posts: 766
Location: in the shed

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 13 post(s)
So you're sure all HK327 had offset resonators, that sucks I thought I'd struck gold with that find.
I have original rear muffler and tail pipes it would have been nice to have the whole system old stock.
gm5735 Offline
#7 Posted : Wednesday, 17 August 2016 10:37:52 PM(UTC)
gm5735

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/04/2014(UTC)
Posts: 768
Man
Location: Victoria

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 47 post(s)
Sure is a strong word! I was of that opinion, and checked around before answering, and the consensus supports that they were all offset.
I'll ask Ben also.
RigPig Offline
#8 Posted : Wednesday, 17 August 2016 10:53:23 PM(UTC)
RigPig

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/07/2006(UTC)
Posts: 766
Location: in the shed

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 13 post(s)
Originally Posted by: gm5735 Go to Quoted Post
Sure is a strong word! I was of that opinion, and checked around before answering, and the consensus supports that they were all offset.
I'll ask Ben also.


That would be appreciated, thanks mate.
Wayne
HK1837 Offline
#9 Posted : Thursday, 18 August 2016 3:34:49 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
Wayne, the HT-HG 350 front driver's side pipe is different due to the exhaust manifold being different. It had to clear the different starter motor.
HK 5litte was optional with N10 dual exhaust for all body styles other than Brougham from memory - I have pricing for it. It was the 327's system. HT 5litre not sure as the 350's system wouldn't fit it.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Silverfox Offline
#10 Posted : Friday, 26 August 2016 10:50:19 AM(UTC)
Silverfox

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/11/2008(UTC)
Posts: 435

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
The front mufflers on my car are stamped 1971. One has NASCO in raised letters pressed into it. the other is plain but both are identical. Yes my car has the whisper quiet idle and is throaty when the right pedal is mashed. ... I am told that the routing of the exhaust is pretty accurate and the pipes are likely genuine. The pipes from the back of the front mufflers to the rear resonator were bent in an exhaust shop.


Mine is a type two engine, Brisbane build car.

I am about to remove the exhaust and fabricate a mandrel bent system to replace. The old system will be stored. Has anyone got a suggestion on how to preserve used pipes and mufflers in storage?

I hope these photos help.
Cheers Nick.










Edited by user Friday, 26 August 2016 11:21:34 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

"HOLDEN MONARO. OUT TO DRIVE YOU WILD!"
gm5735 Offline
#11 Posted : Monday, 29 August 2016 9:21:43 AM(UTC)
gm5735

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/04/2014(UTC)
Posts: 768
Man
Location: Victoria

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 47 post(s)
Wayne, all HK81837 have the offset resonators, and there is no difference between Type 1 and 2.
That pipe is HT/HG81837. You may find a small WCS logo stamped into the can, which is one of the manufacturers.
RigPig Offline
#12 Posted : Monday, 29 August 2016 9:35:53 PM(UTC)
RigPig

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/07/2006(UTC)
Posts: 766
Location: in the shed

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 13 post(s)
Originally Posted by: gm5735 Go to Quoted Post
Wayne, all HK81837 have the offset resonators, and there is no difference between Type 1 and 2.
That pipe is HT/HG81837. You may find a small WCS logo stamped into the can, which is one of the manufacturers.


Ok thanks for the confirmation Geoff. I'll see if WCS is on there somewhere.
Silverfox Offline
#13 Posted : Sunday, 1 January 2017 12:38:55 PM(UTC)
Silverfox

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/11/2008(UTC)
Posts: 435

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Does anyone have a comment about the photos I put up?

I am interested in accuracy and happy to help others in any way.

I feel that posting the pics of the genuine resonators might have been worthy of someones point of view.

It would be great to see an accurate exhaust available.

Cheers.
Nick.
"HOLDEN MONARO. OUT TO DRIVE YOU WILD!"
RigPig Offline
#14 Posted : Monday, 2 January 2017 10:35:26 PM(UTC)
RigPig

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/07/2006(UTC)
Posts: 766
Location: in the shed

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 13 post(s)
Hi Nick from the investigations I've been doing lately I'd say your drivers side front pipe is exactly correct.
I think your passenger side front pipe may have a slight extra bend in there (highlighted) to make the resonators look more symmetrical. The pipe should be just a little closer to the gearbox crossmember I think but thats just based on other images I've seen.

The resonators originally were far from symmetrical they both sat at different angles and positions to each other.
Most people try to keep the resonators looking symmetrical under there but thats not how they were originally.

Theres a good image of the original resonator positions in the "Scientific Publications No.75" HK manual, if you can find a copy. The one with the 327 engine on the front cover.

I'll be basing my exhaust on your images and the images in the Scientific Publications No.75 HK manual.

Thanks for sharing the photos, I think its very useful info.
Wayne
Silverfox Offline
#15 Posted : Thursday, 5 January 2017 11:36:13 PM(UTC)
Silverfox

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/11/2008(UTC)
Posts: 435

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
HELLO Wayne.

For what it is worth Ben has been over the car. He commented the exhaust appeared to be quite accurate. Few things to bear in mind when doing the exhaust.

*The red car I now own was built by Jeff Brown. The resto ,I understand, was commenced in the eighties when there was still a fair bit of genuine stock in dealerships. This particular exhaust is dates 1971 which indicates it was possibly stock designated for HK-T-G 327/350 by then. Hence the kink you circled.

*People in NSW, QLD and VIC Clubs have also commented on the accuracy of this exhaust over the years.

*The pipes from the front to rear mufflers is a shop bend-up (in my opinion).

*The rear muffler is also supposed to be a genuine item.

I hope this is helpful. I am happy to help with measurements/ detail pics/info etc. I am prepared to remove the exhust from the car for this if needed as I am as keen as you to see an accurate repro made. That would mean I can remove mine and protect it. I think this system is getting close to its demise.

Cheers.

Nick.

Edited by user Thursday, 5 January 2017 11:39:07 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

"HOLDEN MONARO. OUT TO DRIVE YOU WILD!"
RigPig Offline
#16 Posted : Friday, 6 January 2017 2:49:08 AM(UTC)
RigPig

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/07/2006(UTC)
Posts: 766
Location: in the shed

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 13 post(s)
Nick I could be wrong about your passenger side pipe that bend may well be 100% correct.
I'm only going by the image in the 'Scientific Publications No.75' manual.
Only a couple of centimeters in it anyway.

There were separate part numbers for HK327 exhaust pipes (front and rear) well into 1974.
Your pipes wont fit a HT/G 350 they're definitely HK327 only.

Not an easy item to measure but it would be reasonably easy for someone to use as a template and copy if they had it in their hands.
You could get a few sets of front pipes made up, you may have the only set of correct pipes in the land.
I think you'd get a few orders.
Silverfox Offline
#17 Posted : Friday, 6 January 2017 4:54:47 PM(UTC)
Silverfox

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/11/2008(UTC)
Posts: 435

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Hi Wayne.

Byron, do have any knowledge in this area?

Cheers.

Nick.
"HOLDEN MONARO. OUT TO DRIVE YOU WILD!"
HK1837 Offline
#18 Posted : Friday, 6 January 2017 6:25:17 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
Yes and no. Wayne is correct that 327/307 dual system and 350 dual systems are different in a few ways, one being the straight through resonators on 350 and the driver's side exhaust manifold kinking out further on 350 to miss the starter motor (11" flywheel).

I have one NOS pipe in my shed, I think it is one of the engine pipes, passenger side I think. Will look.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Silverfox Offline
#19 Posted : Saturday, 7 January 2017 12:10:14 PM(UTC)
Silverfox

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/11/2008(UTC)
Posts: 435

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Thanks Byron.

An area overlooked resulting in loss of accuracy. Would love to see a pic of the pipe.

Cheers.
Nick.
"HOLDEN MONARO. OUT TO DRIVE YOU WILD!"
Gerard Offline
#20 Posted : Friday, 13 January 2017 11:10:43 PM(UTC)
Gerard

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 30/06/2014(UTC)
Posts: 146

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Some photos of the exhaust system I have on my car. Wasn't interested in an original 307 system and don't think the 327/350 factory style system sound all that good. This system is quiet at legal cruise speed and has a good note when given some revs through the gears. Located the twin outlet in the centre as a mix between the rh side single pipe outlet on the original 307 muffler and the twin lh -rh outlets pipes on the 327 muffler.







 1 user thanked Gerard for this useful post.
Ausjacko on 22/06/2017(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.118 seconds.