Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

HK1837 Online
#1 Posted : Saturday, 26 September 2026 1:23:15 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 15,075

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 610 time(s) in 577 post(s)
Here's a head scratcher for everyone.

Prior to LH and HJ, GMH used numerical model coding for each distinct model For HK they just used a single odd number model code, without distinguishing between 6cyl or V8 models like they started during later HK. So:

01 was Belmont.
03 was Kingswood.
05 as Premier.
07 was GTS.

HT and HQ model coding began during early HK where they separated 6cyl models into odd numbers and V8 into even. They'd already allocated:

11 and 12 to Premier & V8 Premier.
13 and 14 to Brougham / Deville and V8 Brougham & V8 Deville (there were at least export 81369's in HQ, not sure abou.
15 and 16 to Statesman.

So GTS327 got 18 as it was the next available even number. They also added 84469 as HQ Chevrolet 350 sedan.

When it comes to Torana they again used the odd numbers for 6cyl and used even numbers for 4cyl. SO for example:

22 was Torana 4cyl
23 was Torana S 6cyl
24 was Troana S 4cyl
25 was Torana SL 6cyl
26 was Torana SL 4cyl.

I'm not sure what they planned for 27 and 28 but 29 we know was GTR.

The question is, if they'd gone ahead and made the LJ XW7 (V8 GTR XU1) what model code would they have used? Was there anything obscure in GMH with a 3x coding? Coukd it have been an 83011 or 82811?
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Smitty2 Offline
#2 Posted : Saturday, 26 September 2026 5:42:41 PM(UTC)
Smitty2

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/07/2019(UTC)
Posts: 454
Australia
Location: bayside Melbourne

Thanks: 285 times
Was thanked: 39 time(s) in 38 post(s)
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
Here's a head scratcher for everyone.

...................................

I'm not sure what they planned for 27 and 28 but 29 we know was GTR.

The question is, if they'd gone ahead and made the LJ XW7 (V8 GTR XU1) what model code would they have used? Was there anything obscure in GMH with a 3x coding? Could it have been an 83011 or 82811?


AFAIK, could not be 82811... that was a LJ Torana 4 cyl DELUXE 2 door (came with either 1.6 or 1.76 engines)


Before my time at Holden, but I wonder if they would have done the same as the XU1 variant of the GTR
Same model as GTR 82911 but an option with the XU1 code

Remember GMH also did the same with LH L34 models... it was a LH SL/R 5000 model 8VD69 with the production option L34
and
I should mention that was originally going to be an 8VD69 with production option XU2

HTH
Club circuit racing...the best fun you can have with your pants on
Dr Terry Offline
#3 Posted : Sunday, 27 September 2026 3:27:03 AM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,158

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 244 time(s) in 218 post(s)
28 was used for Deluxe 4-cyl in LC/LJ & also Brabham in late HB, so the V8 LJ would've been 83011, or 82911 plus the option package XW7.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
8D11PCH2 Offline
#4 Posted : Sunday, 27 September 2026 7:35:41 AM(UTC)
8D11PCH2

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/09/2016(UTC)
Posts: 231
Australia
Location: OZ

Was thanked: 28 time(s) in 26 post(s)
I the V8 XU1 (XW7) was to have been an RPO on the 82911 and was to basically look like any other 6cyl XU1 externally, so I believe it would have retained the 82911 model number.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2026, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.028 seconds.