Rank: Veteran
Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,047
|
us muscle is also depicted by `war paint` models racing stripes and patches which would then include the HQ GTS and SS with unique war paint .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
|
Matt: The brabham Torana had more go fast stripes than the GTR XU1, so on looks which should we include???? Ther too tame Brabham or the can hardly see ya XU1.
Power to weight, interesting as most cars today have better power to weight than the cars on
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 2/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,898
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
This isnt a bad site but covers no "foreign" sheet metal at all http://www.musclecarclub...lecars-definition.shtml
It **** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 2/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,898
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
This isn't a bad site but covers no "foreign" sheet metal at all http://www.musclecarclub...lecars-definition.shtml
It *** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717
Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
|
If we use Bathurst, we then might run into trouble with the equally as important (to some) touring car championship. I think "our" criteria works, but like any rule/law/definition there are some exceptions that need to be added or subtracted. Like the A9X |
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords? |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058
Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
|
Hi Byron.
The RS2000 is OK for a performance car but not as a muscle car, because the 2.0-litre motor was just a stocker. 300Cs don't qualify, they're not made in Australia.
I don't think that Giacotollos or Bolwells qualify, they are 2 seater sport |
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058
Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
|
Hi Byron.
The RS2000 is OK for a performance car but not as a muscle car, because the 2.0-litre motor was just a stocker. 300Cs dont qualify, theyre not made in Australia.
I dont think that Giacotollos or Bolwells qualify, they are 2 seater sports c |
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2005(UTC)
Posts: 718
|
My personaly opinion (and lets face it - these lists are just your own personal opinions and not legally binding or any such crap), is that as long as it was designed to look the part and could back it up with a reasonable amount of grunt (or at least sou Edited by user Friday, 8 June 2007 6:14:08 AM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2005(UTC)
Posts: 718
|
My personaly opinion (and let's face it - these lists are just your own personal opinions and not legally binding or any such crap), is that as long as it was designed to look the part and could back it up with a reasonable amount of grunt (or at least so Edited by user Friday, 8 June 2007 6:14:08 AM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 5/07/2005(UTC)
Posts: 349
|
Interesting Thread!!
Munromad is pretty right, it open to interpretation from whoever. Everyone has different ideas of musclecars.
If it's the fastest, the current VE SS.
Fastest for each model each year, then theres a few you could chose.
As far as w
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 5/07/2005(UTC)
Posts: 349
|
Interesting Thread!!
Munromad is pretty right, it open to interpretation from whoever. Everyone has different ideas of musclecars.
If its the fastest, the current VE SS.
Fastest for each model each year, then theres a few you could chose.
As far as wh
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/12/2006(UTC)
Posts: 65
|
I must be stuck in a time warp as I have always considered muscle cars to be of 60's to 70's vintage.....I think this comes from the fact that GMH ceased production of Monaro's and Torana's in the 70's. In fact I can not think of one Australian built musc
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/12/2006(UTC)
Posts: 65
|
I must be stuck in a time warp as I have always considered muscle cars to be of 60s to 70s vintage.....I think this comes from the fact that GMH ceased production of Monaros and Toranas in the 70s. In fact I can not think of one Australian built muscle ca
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,047
|
When I think of early muscle cars (growing up in the 70`s)it was any aussie make with blackouts, patches , go faster stripes and a cool exhaust note, when I was in year 6 (about 1975-6) I wanted a sandman and my mate wanted a drifter and we all yelled hey
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/04/2005(UTC)
Posts: 758
|
Hehe - what a can of worms !
My 2 bobs worth ! A HK 6cyl in pale blue wouldnt be a muscle car, yet a red HK with any V8 combo would. Raced or unraced. Plus suitable blackouts, engine/exhaust tone etc.
It's a tough nut to crack with these criteria.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/04/2005(UTC)
Posts: 758
|
Hehe - what a can of worms !
My 2 bobs worth ! A HK 6cyl in pale blue wouldnt be a muscle car, yet a red HK with any V8 combo would. Raced or unraced. Plus suitable blackouts, engine/exhaust tone etc.
Its a tough nut to crack with these criteria. I
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 12/10/2005(UTC)
Posts: 495
|
Im with Matt on this one, Muscle Cars died in the 70s and I think anything after that phase was and is just a performance car.
I really dont think you could call a car constrained with pollution equipment and electric everything a muscle car.
Cars of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 12/10/2005(UTC)
Posts: 495
|
I'm with Matt on this one, Muscle Cars died in the 70's and I think anything after that phase was and is just a performance car.
I really don't think you could call a car constrained with pollution equipment and electric everything a muscle car.
Cars
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 43,977
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
|
Well if we stop after fuel injection do not forget the 57 Chev with fuel injection, so nothing after 57.
How about pre electronics, nothing after the EH with the alternator.
If we are going to draw the line at a date it should be at adr 27a, A9X out
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,717
Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
|
quote:
Originally posted by Dr Terry
Hi Byron.
The RS2000 is OK for a performance car but not as a muscle car, because the |
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords? |
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
