Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

harley Offline
#1 Posted : Friday, 2 January 2015 1:33:22 AM(UTC)
harley

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 17

Hey all.

I've pulled apart my brake system from my HG Brougham which has been laid up for over 13 years (I've had it for 4)

I've replaced the master cylinder with a new one (Both PBR, didn't have a Big Nut to reco), and the rear cylinders as well. In stripping down I've found the rear flex hose and driver's flex hose are clogged, so I'll replace all of them.

There's a fair amount of oxidisation through all the rigid lines, though they are not blocked. If I replace the flex hoses and do a full flush with metho before i hook up the new cylinders, will that be enough to clear out the residual gunge? I'm using a vacuum bleeder for that work.

The last thing I need to do before I reassemble is decide what to do with the front brake calipers. The boots are toast, so new rubber will go in there, but I'm not sure about the need for pistons. They were jammed in hard, compressed air got the outside piston out of both calipers, but on the inside one I had to use some persuasion. In doing that I dinged the pad/piston contact edge a little on one. I'm not sure if that's critical or not. Either way, once I freed them up by retracting them a little they came out with the air pressure just fine.

What's left now is some pretty nasty oxidisation residue in the piston bores. I think it will clean up without needing a scourer, but how far can I go if it does? The old shop manual says steel wool on the outer bore only, but it would never have taken into account a 15 year layup. Can I clean with 600 or 1200 grit wet and dry, or just some steel wool carefully.

so tl;dr questions:

Is a metho clean enough for the oxidisation in the rigid hoses?
Do I need to replace the pistons if there's no wear/scoring on the inside, but light dings in the pad contact area?
How hard can you clean the bores if the oxidisation is bedded in?


gm5735 Offline
#2 Posted : Friday, 2 January 2015 8:44:20 AM(UTC)
gm5735

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/04/2014(UTC)
Posts: 768
Man
Location: Victoria

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 47 post(s)
Hi Harley.
I just went through the same exercise myself on a HT, laid up for 20 years.
First, the bundy tube hard lines. Mine were fairly rusty inside, and from your description of clogged flexible hoses and your inspection you are in the same boat. You will probably flush the loose stuff out with metho but under hydraulic pressure, which will be much higher than anything you can create with a vacuum bleed setup, more junk will be dislodged from the inside walls of the bundy tubing. These abrasive rusty particles will eventually find their way into, and damage, all the seals in the system and promote cylinder bore corrosion.
I've replaced all the hard lines, and I suggest you replace them if you can afford it. If not, bleed a full master cylinder of fluid through the system at frequent intervals, at least for the first few thousand kms. That should help flush any loosened rubbish out of the bleeders. When you do bleed it, don't use a full stroke of the brake pedal. That bottoms the master cylinder pistons, which is where all the rubbish lives, and if you use a full pedal stroke it will chop out the seals.

On the subject of the calipers, I had the same issues. There was some corrosion around the fluid ports at the bottom of the bores. I cleaned it up with Grade 0, and then polished it with Grade 0000 steel wool using brake fluid as a lubricant. I'd keep clear of the wet and dry if you can. You will feel ridges in the bores, which create multiple fluid seals against the piston, along with the main rubber seal. What you do not want to do is rub them smooth!
Corrosion at the bottom of the bores doesn't matter too much, as long as you stop it spreading, as the piston doesn't touch it, but how far up the walls of the bores do you have the corrosion? That, and how deep it is, will determine if the calipers can be saved.
How is the piston surface? It should be uniformly polished without any scuffing, dings or corrosion.
They seem to go for around $120 for a set of four, so relatively cheap to replace.
I assume you are replacing the hydraulic seals as well as the boots. Try and go for PBR/Bosch if you can, as I've heard some of the other brands are not very good. Don't be tempted to split the caliper halves to replace the O rings which live inside, unless they are leaking between the halves.

If everything else about the pistons is OK, a ding or two in the pad backing plate face is no big drama.(assuming it is not huge ding, that is). Just get a flat plate of thick glass or similar, wet it, slap some 600 or 1200 wet and dry in the puddle and lap the face flat. A small low spot or two wont matter, but you definitely don't want high spots, which will tend to cock the pistons in the bores. Perhaps mark the face with a texta and lap until the texta is all gone. (Except for the low spots, obviously)
I hope that helps.
johnperth Offline
#3 Posted : Friday, 2 January 2015 12:17:34 PM(UTC)
johnperth

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,991

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
gm5735
the information you have here is a surprise to me.
I am not a mechanic let alone a brake tech but I would have thought ridges in the bores would be a no no, the piston might jam against them, and the wider bits where there is no ridge would allow fluid leakthrough. however most of my knowledge is drum brakes discs may be different.
I have a hone which fits in the electric drill and use that, carefully, it works fine, it has 3 legs on springs which open out and don't place a lot of pressure on the bores.
as for the rust in the lines I would think it would eventually get back to the master cylinder and cause all sorts of blocking problems there, also would cause rapid wear of the rubbers leading to leakages and failure. if there was ANY rust in my brake lines I would be replacing them, there's nothing quite like brake failure to quicken the pulse.
After you polish the bores, whether by honing or sanding make sure you really clean the bores thoroughly with methylated spirits to get all the abrasive particles out. lubricate with brake fluid before reassembly.
I resurrected a morris minor for my daughter and there was some sort of gunge in the lines which would gradually over about 20 k let the pressure build up in the lines and the car would gradually grind to a halt. wait 20 minutes and off again. I think it was a mixture of inapprpriate brake fluids and water in the lines.
gm5735 Offline
#4 Posted : Friday, 2 January 2015 9:59:21 PM(UTC)
gm5735

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/04/2014(UTC)
Posts: 768
Man
Location: Victoria

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 47 post(s)
Hi John.
Perhaps my choice of wording wasn't the best, and "ridge" is too strong a word to use.
Call it machining marks, if you will. On the ones I've seen the bores of these particular calipers are not dead smooth from the factory.
You would be reaching for your hone, or even a boring bar if you saw the same finish in an engine cylinder.
The operating conditions for a caliper bore/piston and an engine bore/piston are, however, completely different.
The caliper piston is driven by an incompressible medium (brake fluid), has a very short stroke, and has very low piston velocity.
An engine cylinder is obviously almost totally the reverse with compressible gasses, relatively long stroke and very high piston speeds, hence the need for multiple piston rings, different sealing and different surface finish.

The point I was trying to make was that the surface finish should be left as it was ex factory, and not honed smooth, which may create excessive clearance between the bore and the piston and cause leaks.
In any case, getting a hone in there would require splitting the caliper halves, which is specifically not recommended in the factory shop manual.
I believe the HG would have the thicker brake discs (0.625") and the calipers would have a spacer plate between the halves, which makes it even less of a good idea to split them.

Yes, I agree, replacing all the hard lines is the best choice, but not everyone can afford it, hence my alternative suggestion.

Regards,
Geoff






harley Offline
#5 Posted : Friday, 2 January 2015 11:36:22 PM(UTC)
harley

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 17

ok, thanks guys.

I've cleaned it with a rag and meths for now, it doesn't look like it's scored or lipped. I get what Geoff means about the finish, so I'm OK with that comment. The local hardware had only grade 2 & 3 steel wool, so I have to do a ring around to find fine grades. I won't be splitting the calipers - there's no leakage I can see.

I'll do the best I can to clean the hard lines with meths and air. Someone's replaced the diff at some point and changed the steel lines for copper, but they also put in twin exhausts which crushed one of the lines. I have a donor original one to put in for now, but one day I'll see what's going on with the Diff and refresh the lot then. This is just a low-cost playtime at the moment.
gm5735 Offline
#6 Posted : Friday, 2 January 2015 11:49:43 PM(UTC)
gm5735

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/04/2014(UTC)
Posts: 768
Man
Location: Victoria

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 47 post(s)
No problem Harley. The copper lines may give you a roadworthy issue if you get someone picky inspecting it, as copper is not OEM specification.
Try Bunnings for your 0000 steel wool, in the sandpaper section. They have so much they will actually sell some of it.
Dr Terry Offline
#7 Posted : Saturday, 3 January 2015 10:40:56 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
quote:
Originally posted by gm5735
The copper lines may give you a roadworthy issue if you get someone picky inspecting it, as copper is not OEM specification.

I'm not sure on the rules in other states, but in NSW copper brake lines are a big no-no for roadworthy.

Unless OEM supplied (e.g. the VH44 accessory kit on early Holdens) copper brake lines are expressly forbidden due to their risk of fatigue.

AFAIK it is the same for petrol lines.

On the subject of disc caliper bore finish, the factory finish is basically 'as cast', or a rough machine cut. The piston surface finish needs to be polished, as is works against the rubber 'ring' seal. As long as there are no high spots in the bore, grooves & pits are no problem. A totally different approach than for drum brake wheel cylinders, where the rubber wears against the bore.

When we fit new caliper pistons we polish them in a lathe to better than a 1200 grit shine, prior to fitting. Many new pistons are a bit rough out of the box.

We also always split the caliper halves, as long as the pieces are marked for proper re-assembly. Now many of these calipers are nearing 50 years old (1965 HD !!) the rubber channel seals are well past their best.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
Dr Terry Offline
#8 Posted : Saturday, 3 January 2015 10:43:37 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
Oops, double post.
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
gm5735 Offline
#9 Posted : Saturday, 3 January 2015 11:44:03 PM(UTC)
gm5735

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/04/2014(UTC)
Posts: 768
Man
Location: Victoria

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 47 post(s)
Terry, Tasmania expressly forbids copper also, but the best we get in Victoria is "an appropriate material". The practical upshot of this seems to be that most RWC inspectors knock back non-factory lines if they spot them.

On the subject of splitting HK/T/G brake calipers, I've always regarded it as right up there with DIY vasectomies in the desirability stakes, at least in the home workshop.

Referring specifically to the HK/T/G Girlock calipers, is it true that there are different torque figures for different bolts in the caliper, per the Shop manual, and do the extra spacer plates in the caliper to suit the 0.625" disc make any difference?
Dr Terry Offline
#10 Posted : Sunday, 4 January 2015 12:11:39 AM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
Happy New Year, Geoff.

I'm spending time in Thailand as we speak. great weather & great food !!

As far as DIY goes, I think that splitting the caliper halves is probably less risky than the piston R & R job itself.

Having said that, even the best mechanics or fitters learned by DIY, initially any way. There are many areas of a car where caution is required. Power steering, auto transmissions & brakes are probably top of that list.

I've always used the same torque specs for all 4 of the UNF caliper housing bolts, with or without spacers. The big trick is be careful not to over-tighten, otherwise the calipers are 'toast'.

The UNC mounting bolts (to the stub axle) have different specs, however.

Dr Terry

If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
harley Offline
#11 Posted : Sunday, 4 January 2015 12:53:20 AM(UTC)
harley

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 17

Well, I'm in the ACT where it's the wild west and could go any way. It's only the 2 lines along the diff itself, I have one I can replace with spares, but I'd have to get the other one manufactured.

Not sure what's going on with the diff. It's got the lug for the brake line along the right axle housing ala the HK diff, but someone has welded a lug on top of the diff to attach the splitter block as per the HT/G. What they've welded on is only large enough for a 1/4 inch bolt, and the splitter is not the original one, as it has a bolt-hole rather than the metal tag flange like the other hoses. Given that and the copper, it's starting to sound like some DIY funkieness. I hesitate to open the diff up - it's supposed to be a 2.78 LSD, but it could be anything.

I'll open a thread later in the Swap forum about the brake lines, otherwise I might just have to wait a few months to get some cash to get a proper replacement.
Dr Terry Offline
#12 Posted : Sunday, 4 January 2015 1:21:34 AM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,058

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 203 time(s) in 184 post(s)
There are 3 different locations for the brake pipe junction block on HK/T/G rear axle housings, but it's not clear cut on the model break. What you probably need is the 'correct' housing to suit your car. There is more than a fair chance it has been swapped in the past, only to find out too late that the junction location was incorrect for that body.

I make a sell 3 different rear brake houses for this purpose, all to factory specs & checking with the catalogues are per model application only confuses the issue further.

Get new brake pipes made, they are quite cheap. I do them for $50 the pair, in new bundy with new tube nuts. I just need the length specs for your model.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
gm5735 Offline
#13 Posted : Sunday, 4 January 2015 1:39:43 AM(UTC)
gm5735

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/04/2014(UTC)
Posts: 768
Man
Location: Victoria

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 47 post(s)
Thanks Terry.
Happy New Year to you too, and I'm sure everyone here who has benefited from your wisdom would wish you the same.
Enjoy Thailand, and give any Moon festivals available a big swerve.

Harley,

ACT is not quite as wild as you think. Check the following link, in particular National Code of Practice 5 (NCOP 5)

http://www.infrastructur.../bulletin/vsb_ncop.aspx

I believe it is applicable in the ACT, based on the RTA website.

In particular, and taken from Section LG, Brakes:

1.1 MODIFICATIONS NOT REQUIRING CERTIFICATION
The following modifications may be performed without certification:
�h Fitting a manufacturer��s optional braking system for the particular make/model; and
�h Fitting of additional or substitute in-line brake boosters to pre-ADR 31/35 vehicles.

And:

2.4 COMPONENT STANDARDS
All components and devices in the Brake System must meet or exceed at least one appropriate
recognised international, national or association standard, where such standards exist, or the
relevant parts thereof. (Recognised can be taken as meaning AS, SAA, SAE, BS, JIS, ISO or
DIN standards).

Hydraulic pipes must be made from steel bundy tube complying with SAE J1047 or equivalent.

All hydraulic pipes must be double flared in accordance with SAE J5336 or equivalent and
appropriate flare connections must be used.
Hydraulic pipes must not be welded, brazed or silver soldered.
Hydraulic brake hoses must comply with SAE J1401 or equivalent. Flexible hoses complying
with ADR 7/... or ADR 42/ 04, including braided brake hoses, are also acceptable.

Now I think about it, these standards would apply to anything non standard in Victoria also. It would just be the luck of the draw how educated an individual RWC tester happened to be.

Excuse my ignorance, but is the diff a banjo or a Salisbury? I'm happy to post photos of the correct Salisbury set up if needed, but can't help with the banjo.

harley Offline
#14 Posted : Saturday, 17 January 2015 7:52:15 AM(UTC)
harley

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 17

quote:
Originally posted by Dr Terry

As far as DIY goes, I think that splitting the caliper halves is probably less risky than the piston R & R job itself.

Having said that, even the best mechanics or fitters learned by DIY, initially any way. There are many areas of a car where caution is required. Power steering, auto transmissions & brakes are probably top of that list.

I've always used the same torque specs for all 4 of the UNF caliper housing bolts, with or without spacers. The big trick is be careful not to over-tighten, otherwise the calipers are 'toast'.



Well, the rubber kit finally arrived (10 day's postage? I think the seller forgot to post it!) comes with new internal caliper rubber, so now it's a do I/don't I question. I have a proper ratchet torque wrench and I'm not afraid to use it. What torque is right here? It has ft/lbs and NM scales iirc.

And Geoff, it wasn't the regulations I was questioning in the ACT, it was the quality of the inspectors.
gm5735 Offline
#15 Posted : Monday, 19 January 2015 11:23:44 PM(UTC)
gm5735

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/04/2014(UTC)
Posts: 768
Man
Location: Victoria

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 47 post(s)
I've been told 35 ft-lbs torque for the bolts, but I think you better wait for Dr "T" on that one.

I figured the inspectors were your issue, hence giving you some facts to go in with. It's always nice to be able to greet
"I think..." with "The facts are..." don't you think?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.086 seconds.