Thanks Terry.
Happy New Year to you too, and I'm sure everyone here who has benefited from your wisdom would wish you the same.
Enjoy Thailand, and give any Moon festivals available a big swerve.
Harley,
ACT is not quite as wild as you think. Check the following link, in particular National Code of Practice 5 (NCOP 5)
http://www.infrastructur.../bulletin/vsb_ncop.aspx
I believe it is applicable in the ACT, based on the RTA website.
In particular, and taken from Section LG, Brakes:
1.1 MODIFICATIONS NOT REQUIRING CERTIFICATION
The following modifications may be performed without certification:
�h Fitting a manufacturer��s optional braking system for the particular make/model; and
�h Fitting of additional or substitute in-line brake boosters to pre-ADR 31/35 vehicles.
And:
2.4 COMPONENT STANDARDS
All components and devices in the Brake System must meet or exceed at least one appropriate
recognised international, national or association standard, where such standards exist, or the
relevant parts thereof. (Recognised can be taken as meaning AS, SAA, SAE, BS, JIS, ISO or
DIN standards).
Hydraulic pipes must be made from steel bundy tube complying with SAE J1047 or equivalent.
All hydraulic pipes must be double flared in accordance with SAE J5336 or equivalent and
appropriate flare connections must be used.
Hydraulic pipes must not be welded, brazed or silver soldered.
Hydraulic brake hoses must comply with SAE J1401 or equivalent. Flexible hoses complying
with ADR 7/... or ADR 42/ 04, including braided brake hoses, are also acceptable.
Now I think about it, these standards would apply to anything non standard in Victoria also. It would just be the luck of the draw how educated an individual RWC tester happened to be.
Excuse my ignorance, but is the diff a banjo or a Salisbury? I'm happy to post photos of the correct Salisbury set up if needed, but can't help with the banjo.