Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 30/04/2005(UTC) Posts: 470 Was thanked: 15 time(s) in 14 post(s)
|
https://www.australianmu...rana-slr-5000-l34.html, I was unable to post a pic of this tag , but something looks wrong to me ? What do you think ? Mark. |
life is good in "Wine & Holden Marlborough " |
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC) Posts: 14,717
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
|
|
_______________________________________________________ If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords? |
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/04/2014(UTC) Posts: 768 Location: Victoria Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 47 post(s)
|
The tag looks a bit battered and wrinkled if it's never been off the car, and I wonder about a coil with a 9/74 manufactured date for a car delivered on 22/8/1974.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC) Posts: 14,717
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
|
Remember it's a Dandenong car. They are constructed differently to other locations at this time. |
_______________________________________________________ If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords? |
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/04/2014(UTC) Posts: 768 Location: Victoria Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 47 post(s)
|
Not sure I understand what you mean Byron. My point was that the books show a delivery date of 22/8/1974, and the coil has a manufactured date of 9/74, which doesn't compute no matter where the car was built. It obviously matters to someone, or why the photo of the coil? Edit - sorry Geoff, I edited rather than replied! Reply a few posts on. Edited by user Tuesday, 5 April 2016 6:03:36 AM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 420
Thanks: 3 times Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 9 post(s)
|
Could easily be a replacement coil or dated in advance. It seems to have supporting documentation including the original dealer books and it's 1988 sale. The best part is the original owners name is there and if I was willing to spend that amount of coin, I would be chasing him up for a chat. |
j.williams |
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran
Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC) Posts: 14,717
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 512 time(s) in 488 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: gm5735 Not sure I understand what you mean Byron. My point was that the books show a delivery date of 22/8/1974, and the coil has a manufactured date of 9/74, which doesn't compute no matter where the car was built. It obviously matters to someone, or why the photo of the coil? Edit - sorry Geoff, I edited rather than replied! Reply a few posts on. I had no idea the original post was about the coil as the link in the first post doesn't work - this is why I reposted the link. The photo is most likely to show it has an original L34 coil which are rare. The body tag is knocked around but the damage is consistent with a Dandenong car and how it is constructed. |
_______________________________________________________ If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords? |
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.