Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

3 Pages<123
castellan Offline
#41 Posted : Friday, 12 October 2018 10:19:12 AM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,647

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: castellan Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: Ausjacko Go to Quoted Post
Anyone have a clue why they made the HG 350 with only a 2 speed power glide?


They had 3sp autos in the USA in small block Chevs, so yes they could of done so, but it cost more.


They had a TH400 but it would never have fitted the old HD-HG floor pan. The new TH350 was only introduced in 1969, and the HG was well locked in by that time.

Closer to the truth will be fact that the HG isn't truly a different model, it is more of a "SeriesII HT". It was only created as GMH thought the HT would end up running for way too long as the HQ was delayed terribly by GM US's decision to have GMH kill off the HK based HQ and replace it with a US design, which GMH had to finalise. Thus the "gap filler" HG was created.

If you ignore the softening of the HG (examples removal of stainless, the softer nose and tail-lights and softening of suspension in more variants) there isn't all that much difference between a HT and a HG. Sure GMH's rejig of the European TH180 into the Trimatic was part of HG, but it was probably destined to be introduced with HQ anyway.

At the end of the day, the amount of re-work to fit a TH400 for less than 200 cars only for HG wouldn't be worth it. Plus the cost would be prohibitive and it is unlikely that the GM parent would even supply the TH400 transmission for the LM1 engine in that size car anyway. TH350 yes, but it wasn't available when the HG was designed.


Right you are.
HK1837 Offline
#42 Posted : Friday, 12 October 2018 10:36:58 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 15,011

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 601 time(s) in 568 post(s)
Originally Posted by: castellan Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
I guess it depends on whether the HT 308 GTS was standard spec or optioned with dual exhaust and maybe with 3.36 rear axle. An early HT 5.0L GTS (307) with dual exhaust was a quick car as from memory it was standard with a 3.36 rear axle. The automatic HT 350 was pretty quick too.


HT-G GTS 308's all have dual exhaust and std 3.36 diff and XT GT have 2.93 diff, but I am sure that the HT-G GTS 308 auto or manual would hose of a XT GT, but for top end, but a 3.08 ratio would still eat a XT GT I am sure.

HG GTS 308 trimatic auto would be a quicker car than a GTS 350 auto.Shhh


I'm pretty certain the only HT-HG with standard dual exhaust was an 81837. It took until the HX GTS before a Holden V8 was standard with dual exhaust, although the HQ SS got a dual system (and 3.36 rear axle which made a standard HQ GTS 308 very surprised).
Correct, HT-HQ 308 auto rear axle ratio was all 3.36 standard fitment.

I agree a dual exhaust manual 307 or 308 HT or HG would be close to an XT GT, but the single exhaust versions no. Wouldn't take much to quicken up an XT GT though as it had 10:1 compression and was a nice motor. 3.25 gears and a Quadrajet or 600cfm Holley and it'd be far quicker.

HT-HG GTS350 auto were not a slow car, they were still a tad over 9:1 engine and the only difference between this engine and the manual car was the head chamber sizes and 2 bolt block rather than 4 bolt. Valves, intake, carb (other than vacuum source for dizzy), dizzy, cam, pistons, crank etc all the same. They did have a 3.08 rear axle as standard but 3.36 was optional. In fact the Press were very impressed, even more so when they timed these (with air and/or steer) to be not far off the manual cars, without knowing that GMH had hidden the manual car's true performance. A standard HT GTS350 auto optioned with A/C and power steering as tested by the press at the time managed 16.0s 1/4 mile @90mph, 117mph top speed and 0-100mph is 22.0s. This was letting the auto do its thing, not manual shifting. Apart from the top speed limitation of the auto transmission that is pretty much line ball with an XT GT as tested by the same methods by the same people and faster than the automatic GT. The XW GT auto would have easily had its measure though, but may have got a bit of a shock coming up against one optioned with a 3.36 rear end and no air or steer as that would be a significantly closer match.

Edited by user Friday, 12 October 2018 3:17:09 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Fixed rear axle ratio for 308 auto HT-HG

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Warren Turnbull Offline
#43 Posted : Friday, 12 October 2018 2:07:43 PM(UTC)
Warren Turnbull

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 10/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,363

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 28 post(s)
I am not sure why the ARDC was so anal about the rear axle ratio thing. I do know they were very anal about cars being produced and to some extent being identical. Dealers were told to register their demonstrators so that they could be checked to have "sold" so many. But you would thing options like reclining seats, axle ratios etc would be overlooked.

This is most likely why the very limited identical build of later models would have come about.

Lets not forget the very published account of the XY phase III 15" globes with the ARDC checking all owners had received a set, the last being an owner in Tasmania from memory.
HK1837 Offline
#44 Posted : Friday, 12 October 2018 3:01:03 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 15,011

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 601 time(s) in 568 post(s)
And the reclining versus fixed bucket seat thing Warren, very odd. Luckily tyres were free or they'd be after 200 cars with the same diff ratio, same seats backs AND same tyres! Imagine if all Salisbury units weren't LSD? Or if the HK Kingswood raced had an LSD or an alternate rear axle ratio as well as 186S, 4spd and reclining bucket seats? GMH found over 200 of these cars with standard rear axle, but my guess is the same thing with LSD or 3.08 rear axle would be lucky to be a handful of cars made.

Edited by user Friday, 12 October 2018 3:03:41 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
8D11PCH2 Offline
#45 Posted : Friday, 12 October 2018 8:01:06 PM(UTC)
8D11PCH2

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/09/2016(UTC)
Posts: 221
Australia
Location: OZ

Was thanked: 26 time(s) in 24 post(s)
Originally Posted by: abi Go to Quoted Post
One thing you will notice in old photos is all the 327s (and GTs) at Bathurst run the stock exhaust all the way to the rear including the quad tail pipes and at other events such as Warwick Farm and Oran Park they exit at the side under the door. This would be due to ARDC vs CAMS rules.

Cheers Adrian


Hello Adrian,

The The C.A.M.S National Competition Rules (NCR) 1968 Appendix C, Group E Series Production rules, Appendix 3(m) "Exhaust systems may, if permitted by the Supplementary Regulations, be varied, but only after the point of entry of the engine pipe into the first muffler".
This was a new rule introduced in 1968.

Obviously the ARDC Supplementary Regulations did not allow any modifications to the exhaust system whereas other clubs did at their sanctioned competitions.

Edited by user Saturday, 13 October 2018 9:25:25 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Ausjacko Offline
#46 Posted : Tuesday, 16 October 2018 8:56:02 AM(UTC)
Ausjacko

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 30/05/2015(UTC)
Posts: 167

Thanks: 50 times
Was thanked: 6 time(s) in 6 post(s)
My question was more to why they did it, not the choice of gearbox. Was it do to with the homologation being spoken about here?

Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: Ausjacko Go to Quoted Post
Anyone have a clue why they made the HG 350 with only a 2 speed power glide?


What else would they have fitted?


HK1837 Offline
#47 Posted : Tuesday, 16 October 2018 9:06:58 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 15,011

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 601 time(s) in 568 post(s)
No. There was no other available gearbox for HG350 auto when HG was finalised.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
HK1837 Offline
#48 Posted : Saturday, 16 May 2026 11:49:17 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 15,011

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 601 time(s) in 568 post(s)
I have been circling back to this (refer post 3 in this thread). I have obtained a whole lot more info and also been talking to Ron Marks who categorically states that he crossed the line first in 1968. I have a whole lot of questions for Ron to fill in for me, so will report back. Just waiting on a few other key bits of info.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
 1 user thanked HK1837 for this useful post.
Smitty2 on 17/05/2026(UTC)
Dr Terry Offline
#49 Posted : Sunday, 17 May 2026 6:58:10 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,151

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 242 time(s) in 216 post(s)
I met Ron Marks at a car show today & he told me that he had lap scoring sheets to prove his claim of "first over the finish line in 1968".

It would make interesting reading.

Dr Terry.
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
HK1837 Offline
#50 Posted : Monday, 18 May 2026 8:05:35 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 15,011

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 601 time(s) in 568 post(s)
He knows he won, he was in the car for the last stint.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
HK1837 Offline
#51 Posted : Thursday, 28 May 2026 10:57:25 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 15,011

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 601 time(s) in 568 post(s)
Had more discussions with Ron yesterday. He remembers all of it, and gave me some more very interesting information.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
HK1837 Offline
#52 Posted : Wednesday, 10 June 2026 3:49:50 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 15,011

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 601 time(s) in 568 post(s)
Few more notes on this I'll share.

Ron Marks was in the car for the 3rd stint, he drove it home. As far as he was concerned, Des was leading when he bought the car in for its second stop which was for one tyre and fuel. 14D never changed brake pads hence why it was leading, that is why it was always effectively in front, everyone else changed pads. This was Bruce Burr's strategy. Ron got in and drove it home with very little brakes. No-one overtook him except for the 9D Seton/Gibson car around 1:43pm (see more below).

Note on brakes. The best evidence of what a brake pad pit stop looked like is recorded by Peter Wherrett. At 10:40 am, the Palmer/West HDRT 24D car made its first stop. It was fuel, front pads and driver change. Des West pitted at 11:17 for fuel, and the car took 22.5 Gallons of fuel, so 24D at 10:40 would have been maybe 16Gallons, so the pit stop time of just under 6 minutes was the pad change time, it would easily have covered fuel.

Some milestones to think about:

12:20pm. Race order was 9D (Gibson), 14D (West), 8D (Geohegan), 13D (McPhee). The two Falcons were up in the mix as they had all done 1 stop only so far (except 23D had done two) and the 23D and 24D HDRT cars had already done pads in their first stops.
12:27pm 8D Geohegan car in for fuel, tyres and driver change.
12:45pm 9D in for pads, fuel, tyres and driver change.
12:51pm 24D in again for driver change, pads (again) and tyres. No more stops for 24D
1.00pm 25D in for driver change and fuel.

80 laps (approx 1.15pm) order was 14D, 9D, 13D, 23D, 25D, 24D, 15D 1E. 8D was out of the race at this time, spent 30 minutes in the pits with failed brakes.

1.41pm 13D in for fuel, tyres, front brake pads and for Bruce to hand over to Barry Mulholland. This would have been a 5 minute stop at least.
1.42pm 23D in for tyres and fuel. Pads changed again.
1.43pm 14D in for 21 gallons of fuel and for Des to hand over to Ron Marks. 9D took the lead at this stage, possibly also overtaken by 13D (unsure of this at this stage but really irrelevent).
1.44pm 13D in for Barry to hand back over to Bruce.
2.06pm 25D in for brake issues, 9 minutes spent in the pits, that is 3 laps. It finished on 127 laps, 3 laps down.
2.21pm Ron bought 14D in quickly for the crew to check brakes and tyres and went out, nothing changed. I've asked Ron how quick this stop was.
2.29pm 9D in for its 3rd stop and fuel, and top up the radiator as it was boiling. Re-entered the race 10 seconds ahead of 14D.
2:45pm After 4 laps Ron was rapidly catching 9D and 9D blew its engine. From here onwards it was Ron in the lead to the finish.
3:45pm 13D shown the checkered flag.

As you can see the order at 80laps (around 1:15pm) was 14D, 9D, 13D, 23D, 25D, 24D, 15D 1E. Scratch 9D, and take out 23D (busted wheel) and 25D (9 minutes in the pits) and you have:

14D, 13D, 24D, 15D, 1E.

You then have to account for both of the 13D stops at 1.41pm and 1:44pm. One was brake pad changes. We are talking probably 7 minutes all up. Enough for 24D to end up in front of 13D.
Also account for 14D's say 2 minutes in the pits at 2:21pm. By total race time and accounting for the above I get the following:

14D 131 laps.
24D 131 laps.
13D 130 laps.
15D 129 laps.
1E 129 laps.
25D 127 laps.

Now I need to spreadsheet the actual lap times.

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Sandaro Offline
#53 Posted : Wednesday, 10 June 2026 5:33:22 PM(UTC)
Sandaro

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/10/2015(UTC)
Posts: 353

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 45 time(s) in 44 post(s)
It's lovely that you have been able to catch up with Ron Marks, but I can't help but think some of the facts have been blurred with rose coloured glasses after nearly 58 years.

Some facts from the original highlights that put some holes in the timeline suggested:


It seems West did the 1st and 3rd stint, Marks 2nd and 4th stint. The last pitstop for 14D, on Ron's account he says already in the car, but on the footage West gets out and the commentator says, McPhees gone through to take the lead and notes that McPhee doesn't have to stop again.

9D Falcon and 8D Falcon on different pitstop strategy, they were leading Monaros but then both had problems. Falcon 8D brakes burnt out, spent 16 minutes in the pits trying to fix, then 9D did a head gasket, pulled into the pits to try to cool engine and then sent him back out in the lead, but then blew the motor completely. At the point that 9D is out, commentator notes that West has gone through to the lead. But then shortly after West pits himself and changes drivers to Marks, as I mentioned above and McPhee goes through.

So unless you are saying that McPhee was a lap down at that point, which I don't think is sustainable as an argument, West/Marks aren't in the lead.

It seems West/Marks should have come 2nd and understandably can feel genuinely aggrieved by the disqualification.
HK1837 Offline
#54 Posted : Wednesday, 10 June 2026 6:07:34 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 15,011

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 601 time(s) in 568 post(s)
All of the above except for the second sentence come from Peter Wherrett who wrote a running diary of the race. Des 100% did the first two stints up to 1.43pm and Ron did the last. There was only 3 x stints for 14D, it only completed 2 pit stops. The one Ron did was a quick unplanned one just to look at tyres and brakes, he remained in the car.

8D and 9D were on the same strategy at their second stops at respectively 12:27 and 12:45 except 9D did pads and 8D didn't, hence why 8D's brakes failed and spent near to half hour in the pits. That is why it ended up finishing at 123 laps, 7 laps down on 13D and 8 laps down on 14D. They were only leading due to the fact they had to complete 3 x refuelling stops, they only had a 1.5 Gallon fuel tank. The Monaros could do it in two stops due to the 26 Gallon tank. This is why both 13D and 14D only did two refuelling stops. Bruce's 3rd stop was only to get Barry out and Bruce back into the car, this was around 1:50pm give or take. The only reason 9D was in front when it popped the engine was because of the quick stop Ron Marks did at 2:21pm. 9D came in for its 3rd stop at 2:29pm, for fuel and water and entered the race 10 seconds ahead of 14D, but 14D quickly caught it and the Falcon blew the engine and limped back to the pits at 2:45pm, this was at the end of its lap 113.

There is no way 13D was ahead of 14D except for the period between 11:17am and 11:30am as Des West pitted for his first stop at 11:17am. West was in front of McPhee at 12:20pm and also at around 1:15pm. 13D did its second stop for pads, driver and fuel at 1.41pm from behind 14D. That is a 6 minute stop give or take. 14D stopped for its second stop at 1.43pm, only did driver change, fuel and one tyre (front right). This is when 9D went in front on 14D. 13D stopped somewhere between 1.44pm and 1:50pm to take Barry out and Bruce get back in. 14D stopped at 2.21pm for a quick brake check, Ron knew his brakes were very limited and knew he was effectively in front as 9D had another fuel stop to do. 9D came in for its 3rd stop at 2.29pm for fuel and water and entered just in front of 14D. In all this, 24D had moved up to be between 14D and 13D as it had only made two stops but the last one was at 12:51pm.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2026, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.093 seconds.